Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
Epidemiol Prev ; 48(2): 118-129, 2024.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38770729

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: according to the International Agency for Cancer Research on Cancer, in 2022, breast cancer is the most common cancer in the Italian population, followed by colorectal cancer. Oncological screenings represent an effective secondary prevention strategy to counteract colorectal and breast cancers, significantly reducing mortality. In Lombardy Region (Northern Italy), screening programmes have been active since 2007, but adherence, especially in specific population subgroups, remains lower than expected. OBJECTIVES: to analyse potential predictors of non-adherence to colorectal and breast cancer screening in the Lombardy Region during the pre-pandemic period of 2018-2019. DESIGN: a retrospective cohort study aimed at investigating the role of sociodemographic variables, health status, and access to the healthcare system on non-adherence to colorectal and breast cancer screening. Statistical analyses were conducted separately by each Agency for Health Protection (ATS). The results of the models were synthesized across the Lombardy region through random-effects meta-analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: residents within the territory of each ATS in Lombardy as of 01.01.2018 and aged between 49 and 69 years at the beginning of the follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: adherence to colorectal and breast cancer screenings. RESULTS: during the study period, across the Lombardy Region, 2,820,138 individuals were eligible to participate in colorectal cancer screening, and 1,357,344 women were eligible to participate in breast cancer screening, with an invitation coverage of 87% and 86%, respectively.For breast cancer screening, older age, cardiopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), autoimmune diseases, and presence of a rare disease are associated with a reduced risk of non-adherence. Conversely, foreign citizenship, oncological diagnosis, transplant, chronic kidney disease/dialysis, diabetes, heart failure, arterial or cerebral vasculopathy, and presence of a neurological diagnosis are associated with significant excess risks of non-participation. For colorectal cancer screening, factors favouring adherence include female gender, older age, cardiopathy, COPD, autoimmune diseases, and having access/utilization of primary care. Non-adherence is associated with foreign citizenship, transplant, chronic kidney disease/dialysis, diabetes, heart failure, arterial or cerebral vasculopathy, IBD, neurological diseases, residence in assisted living facilities, use of integrated home care, and presence of disability. CONCLUSIONS: this is the first study conducted in the Lombardy Region which explores the theme of equity of access to organized screenings. This analysis highlights how sociodemographic determinants, chronic conditions, and access to the healthcare and social healthcare system constitute significant risk factors for non-adherence to screening programmes. Based on the results of this analysis, communication and/or organizational change interventions will be developed to counteract inequalities in access to effective prevention procedures.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias Colorretais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes
2.
Am J Epidemiol ; 2024 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629583

RESUMO

This study aims to estimate long-term survival, cancer prevalence, and several cure indicators for Italian women with gynaecological cancers. Thirty-one cancer registries, representing 47% of the Italian female population, were included. Mixture cure models were used to estimate Net Survival (NS), Cure Fraction, Time To Cure (5-year conditional NS>95%), Cure Prevalence (women who will not die of cancer), and Already Cured (living longer than Time to Cure). In 2018, 0.4% (121,704) of Italian women were alive after corpus uteri cancer, 0.2% (52,551) after cervical, and 0.2% (52,153) after ovarian cancer. More than 90% of patients with uterine cancers and 83% with ovarian cancer will not die from their neoplasm (Cure Prevalence). Women with gynaecological cancers have a residual excess risk of death <5% after 5 years since diagnosis. The Cure Fraction was 69% for corpus uteri, 32% for ovarian, and 58% for cervical cancer patients. Time To Cure was ≤10 years for women with gynaecological cancers aged <55 years. 74% of patients with cervical cancer, 63% with corpus uteri cancer, and 55% with ovarian cancer were Already Cured. These results will contribute to improving follow-up programs for women with gynaecological cancers and supporting efforts against discrimination of already cured ones.

3.
Int J Cancer ; 155(2): 270-281, 2024 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520231

RESUMO

People alive many years after breast (BC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses are increasing. This paper aimed to estimate the indicators of cancer cure and complete prevalence for Italian patients with BC and CRC by stage and age. A total of 31 Italian Cancer Registries (47% of the population) data until 2017 were included. Mixture cure models allowed estimation of net survival (NS); cure fraction (CF); time to cure (TTC, 5-year conditional NS >95%); cure prevalence (who will not die of cancer); and already cured (prevalent patients living longer than TTC). 2.6% of all Italian women (806,410) were alive in 2018 after BC and 88% will not die of BC. For those diagnosed in 2010, CF was 73%, 99% when diagnosed at stage I, 81% at stage II, and 36% at stages III-IV. For all stages combined, TTC was >10 years under 45 and over 65 years and for women with advanced stages, but ≤1 year for all BC patients at stage I. The proportion of already cured prevalent BC women was 75% (94% at stage I). Prevalent CRC cases were 422,407 (0.7% of the Italian population), 90% will not die of CRC. For CRC patients, CF was 56%, 92% at stage I, 71% at stage II, and 35% at stages III-IV. TTC was ≤10 years for all age groups and stages. Already cured were 59% of all prevalent CRC patients (93% at stage I). Cancer cure indicators by stage may contribute to appropriate follow-up in the years after diagnosis, thus avoiding patients' discrimination.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias Colorretais , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Itália/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Prevalência , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino
4.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1168325, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37346072

RESUMO

Objectives: To describe the procedures to derive complete prevalence and several indicators of cancer cure from population-based cancer registries. Materials and methods: Cancer registry data (47% of the Italian population) were used to calculate limited duration prevalence for 62 cancer types by sex and registry. The incidence and survival models, needed to calculate the completeness index (R) and complete prevalence, were evaluated by likelihood ratio tests and by visual comparison. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the effect on the complete prevalence of using different R indexes. Mixture cure models were used to estimate net survival (NS); life expectancy of fatal (LEF) cases; cure fraction (CF); time to cure (TTC); cure prevalence, prevalent patients who were not at risk of dying as a result of cancer; and already cured patients, those living longer than TTC at a specific point in time. CF was also compared with long-term NS since, for patients diagnosed after a certain age, CF (representing asymptotical values of NS) is reached far beyond the patient's life expectancy. Results: For the most frequent cancer types, the Weibull survival model stratified by sex and age showed a very good fit with observed survival. For men diagnosed with any cancer type at age 65-74 years, CF was 41%, while the NS was 49% until age 100 and 50% until age 90. In women, similar differences emerged for patients with any cancer type or with breast cancer. Among patients alive in 2018 with colorectal cancer at age 55-64 years, 48% were already cured (had reached their specific TTC), while the cure prevalence (lifelong probability to be cured from cancer) was 89%. Cure prevalence became 97.5% (2.5% will die because of their neoplasm) for patients alive >5 years after diagnosis. Conclusions: This study represents an addition to the current knowledge on the topic providing a detailed description of available indicators of prevalence and cancer cure, highlighting the links among them, and illustrating their interpretation. Indicators may be relevant for patients and clinical practice; they are unambiguously defined, measurable, and reproducible in different countries where population-based cancer registries are active.

5.
J Clin Med ; 12(6)2023 Mar 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36983173

RESUMO

(1) Objective: In many Western countries, survival from vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) has been stagnating for decades or has increased insufficiently from a clinical perspective. In Italy, previous studies on cancer survival have not taken vulvar cancer into consideration or have pooled patients with vulvar and vaginal cancer. To bridge this knowledge gap, we report the trend in survival from vulvar cancer between 1990 and 2015. (2) Methods: Thirty-eight local cancer registries covering 49% of the national female population contributed the records of 6274 patients. Study endpoints included 1- and 2-year net survival (NS) calculated using the Pohar-Perme estimator and 5-year NS conditional on having survived two years (5|2-year CNS). The significance of survival trends was assessed with the Wald test on the coefficient of the period of diagnosis, entered as a continuous regressor in a Poisson regression model. (3) Results: The median patient age was stable at 76 years. One-year NS decreased from 83.9% in 1990-2001 to 81.9% in 2009-2015 and 2-year NS from 72.2% to 70.5%. Five|2-year CNS increased from 85.7% to 86.7%. These trends were not significant. In the age stratum 70-79 years, a weakly significant decrease in 2-year NS from 71.4% to 65.7% occurred. Multivariate analysis adjusting for age group at diagnosis and geographic area showed an excess risk of death at 5|2-years, of borderline significance, in 2003-2015 versus 1990-2002. (4) Conclusions: One- and 2-year NS and 5|2-year CNS showed no improvements. Current strategies for VSCC control need to be revised both in Italy and at the global level.

6.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(11)2022 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35681699

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of insulin on cancer incidence in type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: The cohort included all 401,172 resident population aged 20-84 in December 2009 and still alive on December 2011, classified for DM status. Drug exposure was assessed for 2009-2011 and follow up was conducted from 2012 to 2016 through the cancer registry. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were computed for all sites and for the most frequent cancer sites. RESULTS: among residents, 21,190 people had diabetes, 2282 of whom were taking insulin; 1689 cancers occurred, 180 among insulin users. The risk for all site was slightly higher in people with T2DM compared to people without DM (IRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.14-1.27), with no excess for T1DM (IRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.45-1.19). The excess in T2DM remained when comparing with diet-only treatment. In T2DM, excess incidence was observed for liver and pancreas and for NETs: 1.76 (95% CI 1.44-2.17) and 1.37 (95% CI 0.99-1.73), respectively. For bladder, there was an excess both in T1DM (IRR 3.00, 95% CI 1.12, 8.02) and in T2DM (IRR1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.50). CONCLUSIONS: Insulin was associated with a 20% increase in cancer incidence. The risk was higher for liver, pancreatic, bladder and neuroendocrine tumours.

7.
Cancer ; 128(2): 364-372, 2022 01 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34582036

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evidence about late effects in adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors is scarce. This study assessed the risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) to identify the most common SMNs to be considered in follow-up care. METHODS: Population-based cancer registries retrospectively identified first primary tumors (between 1976 and 2013) and SMNs in AYAs (15-39 years old at their cancer diagnosis). AYA cancer survivors were those alive at least 5 years after their first cancer diagnosis. The excess risk of SMNs was measured as standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risk together with the cumulative incidence of SMNs. RESULTS: The cohort included 67,692 AYA cancer survivors. The excess risk of developing any SMN (SIR, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-1.7) was 60%. The excess risk of SMNs was significantly high for survivors of lymphomas; cancers of the breast, thyroid, female genital tract, digestive organs, gonads, and urinary tract; and melanomas. The cumulative incidence of all SMNs in AYA cancer survivors within 25 years of their first cancer diagnosis was approximately 10%. Subsequent tumors contributing to approximately 60% of all SMNs were breast cancer, colorectal cancer, corpus uteri cancer, and ovarian cancer in females and colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, and lymphomas in males. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the need to personalize follow-up strategies for AYA cancer survivors.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/diagnóstico , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol ; 9(5): 586-593, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32283044

RESUMO

Purpose: Adolescent and young adult (AYA, 15-39 years) cancer survivors (alive at least 5 years after cancer diagnosis) are less studied than younger and older cancer survivors and research on their late effects is limited. To facilitate research on long-term outcomes of AYA cancer survivors, we established, in Italy, a population-based AYA cancer survivors' cohort. This article describes the study design and main characteristics of this cohort. Methods: The cohort derives from population-based cancer registries (CRs). Each CR identified AYA cancer patients retrospectively. Treatment for first primary cancer and all health events from diagnosis to death can be traced through linkage with available health databases, such as hospital discharge records (HDRs), mortality files, and outpatient and pharmaceutical databases. Results: Thirty-four CRs participated to the cohort which overall includes 93,291 AYAs with cancer and 67,692 cancer survivors. First primary cancer distribution in AYA cancer survivors differs by sex and age groups because of the different cancer types diagnosed in AYAs. Almost 78% of AYA cancer survivors have HDRs and 14.8% also pharmaceutical and outpatient databases. Conclusion: This cohort will be used to study, for the first time in Italy, the pattern and excess risk of late effects in AYA cancer survivors. HDRs, outpatient and pharmaceutical databases will be used to define primary treatment to assess its impact on AYA cancer survivors' late effects. This cohort exploiting data sources already available at CRs, minimize the data collection effort and it will contribute to assess the feasibility of using administrative database to study cancer survivors' late effects.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Adulto Jovem
9.
Epidemiol Prev ; 44(5-6 Suppl 2): 282-287, 2020.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33412820

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: 1. to evaluate mortality risk excess in the population residing in nursing care homes (NCHs) compared to non-NCHs before the COVID-19 outbreak; 2. to verify if the outbreak modified risk excess; 3. to estimate the COVID-19 impact; 4. to ascertain incidence-mortality relationship. DESIGN: cohort study. SETTING AND POPULATION: Mantua and Cremona provinces (Lombardy Region, Northern Italy) - included in ATS Val Padana - with COVID-19 incidence rate 7.5‰ and 16.9‰, respectively. Inhabitants aged >= 75 years as of 1st January 2018, 2019, and 2020 (three cohorts), stratified in NCH or not. The indicators calculated were: 1. rate ratio (RR) for NCH vs non-NCH, adjusted by gender, age, chronic diseases number, at least 1 hospitalisation, at least 1 Emergency room access in the previous year, for 2018, 2019, and 2020; 2. adjusted RR, 2019 and 2020 vs 2018, both sub-cohorts (i.e., NCH and non-NCH). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: first four-month period mortality of the considered years. RESULTS: aproximately 100,000 inhabitants by year, 7% in NCH. In the 2020 first four-month period, 4,343 deaths occurred of which 45% in NCH. RR in NCH population vs non-NCH for the year 2018 was 2.13 (95%CI 1.94-2.34); for the year 2019 was 2.70 (95%CI 2.43-3.00); for the year 2020 was 6.98 (95%CI 6,49-7,50). Adjusted RR for NCH population in 2020 vs 2018 was 2.22 (95%CI 2.05-2.42) in the whole ATS Val Padana; 1.58 (95%CI 1.40-1.77) in Mantua Province; 2.93 (2.62-3.27) in Cremona Province. Adjusted RR in non-NCH population in the year 2020 vs 2018 was 1.59 (95%CI 1.48-1.70) in the whole ATS; 1.34 (95%CI 1.23-1.46) in Mantua Province; 1.89 (95%CI 1.73-2.07) in Cremona Province. CONCLUSIONS: the NCH population experienced an excess risk mortality compared to non-NCH before the COVID-19; this excess increased during the outbreak. In 2020, in NCHs the risk was more than double compared to the 2018 risk, while in non-NCHs it rose approximately by 60%. The gap between NCHs/non-NCHs COVID-19 impact was higher in Cremona than in Mantua.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Mortalidade/tendências , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/mortalidade , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Geografia Médica , Humanos , Incidência , Institucionalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Risco
11.
PLoS One ; 14(7): e0219965, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31329611

RESUMO

The study aims to describe the distribution of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by care plan and to highlight determinants of underuse and overuse of integrated care (IC). This cross-sectional study included all T2D patients resident in Reggio Emilia on 31/12/2015 based on the population-based diabetes registry. Eligibility for IC requires good glycaemic control, no rapid insulin, no kidney failure and no diabetes complications. We calculated the proportion of IC underuse and overuse and adjusted prevalence estimate using multivariate logistic regression. Determinants were age, sex, citizenship, district of residence and time since diagnosis. Of 29,776 patients, 15,364 (51.6%) were in diabetes clinic plan, 9851 (33.1%) in IC plan and 4561 (15.3%) not in any care plan (i.e., in Other group). There were 10,906 (36.6%) patients eligible for IC, of whom 1000 in Other group. When we adjusted for all covariates and restricted the analysis to patients included in care plans, the proportion of those eligible for IC plan but cared for in diabetes clinic plan (i.e. underuse of IC) was 28% (n = 3028/9906; 95%CI 27-29). Similarly, the proportion of those not eligible for IC but cared for in IC plan (i.e. overuse of IC) was 11% (n = 1720/11,896; 95%CI 10-11).The main determinant of both IC underuse and overuse was the district of residence. Foreign status was associated with underuse (37%; 95%CI 33-43), while old age (≥80 years) with both underuse (36%; 95%CI 0.33-0.38) and overuse (23%; 95%CI 22-25). The criterion for suspension of IC plan most frequently found was renal failure, followed by hospitalization for diabetes-related complications. Patients are more often allocated to more specialized settings than not. Healthcare provider-related factors are the main determinants of inappropriate setting allocation.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes
13.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 143: 398-408, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29807100

RESUMO

AIM: To assess the effect of metformin on cancer incidence in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), considering possible interactions with other glucose-lowering drugs and diabetes duration. METHODS: Study cohort included diabetes patients aged 20-84 on December 2009, still alive and resident in Reggio Emilia province as of December 2011. Drug exposure was assessed for 2009-2011; subjects taking metformin continuously, with or without other hypoglycaemic drugs, were compared to subjects on diet-only therapy. The cohort was followed up from 2012 to 2014 through the cancer registry. Age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were computed using Poisson regression models for all sites, lung, breast, liver, colorectal, prostate and pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: The cohort includes 17,026 people with T2DM, 7460 taking metformin. 887 cancers occurred during follow-up, 348 among metformin users. Cancer risk was similar in T2DM patients using metformin and those on diet-only. The risk for prostate (IRR = 0.65; 95%CI:0.36; 1.17), liver (IRR = 0.82; 95%CI:0.36; 1.85) and breast (IRR = 0.77; 95%CI:0.43; 1.40) cancers only was slightly reduced; for lung (IRR = 1.52; 95%CI:0.92; 2.50), pancreas (IRR = 1.51; 95%CI:0.59:3.89) and colon-rectum (IRR = 1.71; 95%CI:0.94; 3.08) the risk was slightly increased. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of antitumor effect of metformin. A possible decrease only for breast, liver and prostate cancer, is compatible with random fluctuations.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Glucose/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patologia , Feminino , Glucose/farmacologia , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Incidência , Masculino , Metformina/farmacologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos de Pesquisa , Adulto Jovem
14.
BMJ Open ; 8(4): e020572, 2018 04 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29678981

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Italian Network of Longitudinal Metropolitan Studies (IN-LiMeS) is a system of integrated data on health outcomes, demographic and socioeconomic information, and represents a powerful tool to study health inequalities. PARTICIPANTS: IN-LiMeS is a multicentre and multipurpose pool of metropolitan population cohorts enrolled in nine Italian cities: Turin, Venice, Reggio Emilia, Modena, Bologna, Florence, Leghorn, Prato and Rome. Data come from record linkage of municipal population registries, the 2001 population census, mortality registers and hospital discharge archives. Depending on the source of enrolment, cohorts can be closed or open. The census-based closed cohort design includes subjects resident in any of the nine cities at the 2001 census day; 4 466 655 individuals were enrolled in 2001 in the nine closed cohorts. The open cohort design includes subjects resident in 2001 or subsequently registered by birth or immigration until the latest available follow-up (currently 31 December 2013). The open cohort design is available for Turin, Venice, Reggio Emilia, Modena, Bologna, Prato and Rome. Detailed socioeconomic data are available for subjects enrolled in the census-based cohorts; information on demographic characteristics, education and citizenship is available from population registries. FINDINGS TO DATE: The first IN-LiMeS application was the study of differentials in mortality between immigrants and Italians. Either using a closed cohort design (nine cities) or an open one (Turin and Reggio Emilia), individuals from high migration pressure countries generally showed a lower mortality risk. However, a certain heterogeneity between the nine cities was noted, especially among men, and an excess mortality risk was reported for some macroareas of origin and specific causes of death. FUTURE PLANS: We are currently working on the linkage of the 2011 population census data, the expansion of geographical coverage and the implementation of the open design in all the participating cohorts.


Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde da População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Itália/epidemiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
15.
Sci Total Environ ; 635: 390-396, 2018 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29674262

RESUMO

Selenium, a trace element to which humans are exposed mainly through diet, has been involved in the etiology of human cancer. We investigated the long-term effects of selenium exposure on cancer incidence using data from a natural experiment in Northern Italy. During the 1970s-1980s, in a part of the Italian municipality of Reggio Emilia, residents were inadvertently exposed to unusually high levels of inorganic hexavalent selenium (selenate) through drinking water. We followed the exposed residents for 28years, generating data on incidence (when available) and mortality rates for selected cancer sites; the remaining municipal residents comprised the unexposed (reference) group. We observed no substantial difference in overall cancer incidence comparing exposed and unexposed cohorts. We detected, however, a higher incidence of cancer at some sites, and for a few of them, namely cancers of the buccal cavity and pharynx, melanoma, urinary tract and lymphoid tissue, the excess incidence was particularly evident in the first period of follow-up but decreased over time. Overall, these results suggest that consumption of water with levels of selenium in its inorganic hexavalent form close to the European standard, 10µg/L, may have unfavourable effects on cancer incidence.


Assuntos
Exposição Dietética/estatística & dados numéricos , Água Potável/química , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Selênio/análise , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Abastecimento de Água/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
PLoS One ; 13(3): e0194784, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29584749

RESUMO

AIMS: To compare the effectiveness of integrated care with that of the diabetes clinic care model in terms of mortality and hospitalisation of type 2 diabetes patients with low risk of complications. METHODS: Out of 27234 people with type 2 diabetes residing in the province of Reggio Emilia on 31/12/2011, 3071 were included in this cohort study as eligible for integrated care (i.e., low risk of complications) and cared for with the same care model for at least two years. These patients were followed up from 2012 to 2016, for all-cause and diabetes-related mortality and hospital admissions. We performed a Poisson regression model, using the proportion of eligible patients included in the integrated care model for each general practitioner as an instrumental variable. RESULTS: 1700 patients were cared for by integrated care and 1371 by diabetes clinics. Mortality rate ratios were 0.83 (95%CI 0.60-1.13) and 0.95 (95%CI 0.54-1.70) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively, and incidence rate ratios were 0.90 (95%CI 0.76-1.06) and 0.91 (95%CI 0.69-1.20) for all-cause and cardiovascular disease hospitalisation, respectively. CONCLUSION: For low risk patients with type 2 diabetes, the integrated care model involving both general practitioner and diabetes clinic professionals showed similar mortality and hospitalisation as a model with higher use of specialized care in an exclusively diabetes clinic setting.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevenção & controle , Modelos Teóricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Causas de Morte , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidade , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ambulatório Hospitalar , Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
BMC Cancer ; 17(1): 703, 2017 Oct 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29070034

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to compare cancer incidence in populations with and without diabetes by cancer site. Furthermore, we aimed at comparing excess risk of cancer according to diabetes type, diabetes duration and treatment, the latter as regards Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: By use of the Reggio Emilia diabetes registry we classified the resident population aged 20-84 at December 31st 2009 into two groups: with and without diabetes. By linking with the cancer registry we calculated the 2010-2013 cancer incidence in both groups. The incidence rate ratios (IRR) by cancer site, type of diabetes, diabetes duration, and as concerns Type 2 diabetes, by treatment regimen were computed using Poisson regression model and non-diabetic group as reference. RESULTS: The cohort included 383,799 subjects without diabetes and 23,358 with diabetes. During follow-up, we identified 1464 cancer cases in subjects with diabetes and 9858 in the remaining population. Overall cancer incidence was higher in subjects with diabetes than in those without diabetes (IRR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.15-1.29), with similar results focusing on subjects with at least 2-year diabetes duration. Cancer sites driving overall increased risk were liver, pancreas, Colon rectum, and bladder in both sexes, corpus uteri for females. There was also suggestion of an increased risk for kidney cancer in females and a decreased risk for prostate cancer. Excess risk was found in patients with Type 2 diabetes, more marked among insulin users, especially with combined therapy. We observed an increasing risk for diabetes duration up to 10 years from diagnosis (IRR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.29-1.61) and a subsequent decrease to moderate-higher risk (IRR = 1.15, 95%CI 1.04-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the strength of association depends on specific cancer site. Insulin, monotherapy or combined therapy, per se or as an indication of poor blood glucose control, in addition to diabetes duration, may play a role in the association of diabetes and cancer.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População/métodos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28678172

RESUMO

We conducted a scoping review of literature to improve our understanding of the accuracy of infectious disease monitoring in migrants in the Europe. We searched PubMed for papers relevant to the topic including: case reports, observational and experimental studies, reviews, guidelines or policy documents; published after 1994. We identified 532 papers, 27 of which were included in the review. Legislation and right to access health care influence both the accuracy of rates and risk measures under estimating the at risk population, i.e., the denominator. Furthermore, the number of reported cases, i.e., the numerator, may also include cases not accounted for in the denominator. Both biases lead to an overestimated disease occurrence. Restriction to healthcare access and low responsiveness may cause under-detection of cases, however a quantification of this phenomenon has not been produced. On the contrary, screening for asymptomatic diseases increases ascertainment leading to increased detection of cases. Incompleteness of denominator data underestimates the at-risk population. In conclusion, most studies show a lower probability of under-reporting infectious diseases in migrants compared with native populations.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Notificação de Doenças , Migrantes , Europa (Continente) , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos
19.
Acta Diabetol ; 54(8): 785-794, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28585044

RESUMO

AIM: To summarize evidence on the effectiveness of educational interventions for type 2 diabetes control in South Asians living in high-income countries. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cinahl and the Cochrane Library, using Medical Subject Heading and free-text terms. The considered outcomes were: mortality, morbidity, glycaemic control, blood pressure, practice (diet, physical activity and self-care), attitudes/awareness and knowledge. Papers published up to July 2015 were considered. Two reviewers independently screened the title and abstract and then read the full text of selected papers. RESULTS: Nine studies were included, four non-randomized studies of interventions and five randomized controlled trials. All studies except one were conducted in the UK. Target population ranged from 39 to 1486 individuals; the follow-up ranged from 1 to 24 months. The interventions were mostly based on a tailored educational package, individually or group administered, conducted by lay link workers, health professionals or both. No study measured mortality or morbidity. An effect on glycaemic control was observed only in before/after studies, while a randomized study showed a non-significant improvement (percentage of glycated haemoglobin -0.15, P = 0.11). Two randomized studies found a reduction in blood pressure. Changes in practice and attitudes showed heterogeneous results, mostly favouring intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There was weak evidence that interventions using link workers and tailored education can modify attitudes, self-care skills and blood pressure in South Asian migrants to industrialized countries. Only one larger trial, with adequate follow-up, showed a small non-significant improvement of glycaemic control.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Estilo de Vida , Ásia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
20.
Int J Endocrinol ; 2017: 6039356, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28316624

RESUMO

The aim of the study is to assess sex difference in association between type 2 diabetes and incidence of major cardiovascular events, that is, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure, using information retrieved by diabetes register. The inhabitants of Reggio Emilia (Italy) aged 30-84 were followed during 2012-2014. Incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using multivariate Poisson model. The age- and sex-specific event rates were graphed. Subjects with type 2 diabetes had an excess risk compared to their counterparts without diabetes for all the three major cardiovascular events. The excess risk is similar in women and men for stroke (1.8 times) and heart failure (2.7 times), while for myocardial infarction, the excess risk in women is greater than the one observed in men (IRR 2.58, 95% CI 2.22-3.00 and IRR 1.78, 95% CI 1.60-2.00, resp.; P of interaction < 0.0001). Women had always a lesser risk than men, but in case of myocardial infarction, the women with type 2 diabetes lost part of advantage gained by women free of diabetes (IRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.72 and IRR 0.36, 95% CI 0.33-0.39, resp.). In women with type 2 diabetes, the risk of major cardiovascular events is anticipated by 20-30 years, while in men it is by 15-20.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...