Effects of a State- and Use-Dependent Nav1.7 Channel Blocker on Ambulatory Blood Pressure: A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Study.

Vixotrigine is a state- and use-dependent Nav1.7 channel blocker being investigated for the treatment of neuropathic pain conditions. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial was designed to evaluate changes in blood pressure with the administration of vixotrigine using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Eligible participants were healthy adults 18 to 65 years of age without evidence of baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) persistently > 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) persistently > 90 mm Hg. Vixotrigine (400 mg [men], 300 mg [women]) or placebo was administered orally twice daily for 36 days. Following a 7-day washout period, participants crossed over to the other treatment. Each dosing period was preceded by 1 inpatient visit and 1 outpatient baseline visit. Two 14-hour inpatient ABPM sessions occurred on days 14 and 35, with a return to the clinic the morning of days 15 and 36 for initiation of outpatient ABPM, which assessed blood pressure and heart rate every 15 minutes. Adverse events were collected throughout the study. The primary end point was the change from baseline in 24-hour mean SBP and DBP on day 36. Sixty participants were enrolled; 10 withdrew from the study owing to adverse events, investigator discretion, or withdrawal of consent. From baseline to day 36, mean changes in average SBP and DBP (vixotrigine treated) were -0.33 and 0.20 mm Hg, respectively. Adverse event rates were comparable for vixotrigine and placebo; the most common adverse events were headache, dizziness, and nausea. Vixotrigine administration is not associated with a clinically important increase in blood pressure.

Efficacy of a methylphenidate transdermal system versus t.i.d. methylphenidate in a laboratory setting.

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy and tolerability of the methylphenidate transdermal formulation (MTS) against immediate-release methylphenidate (IR MPH) and placebo in a 12-hr analog classroom setting. METHOD: A total of nine boys ages 6 to 9 years, medicated with MPH for ADHD, complete a within-subject, double-blind study. For the purpose of the study, the boys are administered a dose of 20 cm(2) MTS, a matched dose of IR MPH 10 mg TID, and placebo. ADHD symptoms and frequency counts of classroom rule violations and the number of math problems completed are assessed hourly, during three consecutive analog classroom sessions. RESULTS: Findings show that, across measures and throughout the day, both treatments significantly differentiated from placebo (p < .05) but not from each other. It is also observed that the MTS produced more consistent results across the day but had a delayed onset versus IR MPH. Both medications are well tolerated with only mild reductions in sleep onset. CONCLUSION: The MTS demonstrates comparable efficacy and tolerability to TID IR MPH.

Effect of Telavancin on the pharmacokinetics of the cytochrome P450 3A probe substrate midazolam: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in healthy subjects.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of telavancin, a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with potent gram-positive activity, on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A probe substrate. Design. Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Setting. Clinical research center. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen healthy adult volunteers. Intervention. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of telavancin 10 mg/kg or placebo once/day for 7 days. On day 7, a single dose of intravenous midazolam 1 mg was given immediately after completion of the last infusion of telavancin or placebo. Patients crossed over to the alternate treatment regimen after a washout period of at least 7 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on study days 7 and 21. Blood was collected before telavancin or placebo dosing and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours after midazolam administration. Formal equivalence analysis using the two one-sided t test method showed that the geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for midazolam coadministered with telavancin versus midazolam coadministered with placebo were close to unity. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) around the ratios fell within the 0.8-1.25 bioequivalence bounds (geometric mean ratio for AUC from time zero to the last measured plasma concentration 0.95, 90% CI 0.910-0.984; C(max) geometric mean ratio 1.03, 90% CI 0.956-1.11). The multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profile of telavancin with concomitant administration of midazolam (C(max) 97 microg/ml, concentration 24 hrs after completion of telavancin infusion 9 microg/ml, terminal-phase elimination half-life 8.9 hrs, clearance 13.3 ml/hr/kg) was consistent with data from earlier studies. CONCLUSION: These pharmacokinetic data show that intravenous telavancin administered at the intended therapeutic dose does not affect the pharmacokinetics of intravenous midazolam. The results indicate that telavancin is unlikely to inhibit hepatic CYP3A activity to a clinically meaningful extent.

Fosamprenavir plus ritonavir increases plasma ketoconazole and ritonavir exposure, while amprenavir exposure remains unchanged.

Plasma ketoconazole (KETO), amprenavir (APV), and ritonavir (RTV) pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 15 healthy subjects after being treated with KETO at 200 mg once daily (QD), fosamprenavir (FPV)/RTV at 700/100 mg twice daily (BID), and then KETO at 200 mg QD plus FPV/RTV at 700/100 mg BID in this open-label study. The KETO area under the concentration-time curve at steady state was increased 2.69-fold with FPV/RTV. APV exposure was unchanged, and RTV exposure was slightly increased.

Multicentre evaluation of the in vitro activity of linezolid in the Western Pacific.

Multiresistance to antimicrobial agents is common in staphylococci and pneumococci isolates in the Western Pacific region. The activity of linezolid, a new oxazolidinone, was evaluated against a spectrum of Gram-positive species collected in the region. Eighteen laboratories from six countries in the Western Pacific examined the linezolid susceptibility of 2143 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Enterococcus spp. using broth microdilution or disc diffusion methodology. For Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 351) and other streptococci (n = 83), Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) strips were used. Results were compared with other common and important antimicrobials. Linezolid-resistant strains were not detected among streptococci or staphylococci, including a significant proportion of S. aureus strains that were multiresistant. Almost all enterococci, including 14 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, were linezolid susceptible. A small proportion of enterococci (0.8%) were intermediate to linezolid, and one strain of Enterococcus faecalis had a zone diameter of 20 mm (resistant). The linezolid MIC ranges (MIC(90)) of those strains tested by broth microdilution or Etest were: 1-4 mg/L (2 mg/L) for S. aureus, 0.5-4 mg/L (2 mg/L) for CoNS, 0.5-4 mg/L (2 mg/L) for Enterococcus spp., 0.12-2 mg/L (1 mg/L) for S. pneumoniae and 0.25-2 mg/L (1 mg/L) for Streptococcus spp. There was no difference in linezolid susceptibility between countries or between multiresistant and susceptible strains of each species monitored.

Multicenter assessment of the linezolid spectrum and activity using the disk diffusion and Etest methods: report of the Zyvox(R) antimicrobial potency study in Latin America (LA-ZAPS).

Linezolid was the first clinically applied member of the new antimicrobial class called the oxazolidinones. These agents have a powerful spectrum of activity focussed against Gram-positive organisms including strains with documented resistances to other antimicrobial classes. We conducted a multicenter surveillance (Zyvox Antimicrobial Potency Study; ZAPS) trial of qualifying Gram-positive isolates from 24 medical centers in eight countries in Latin America. The activity and spectrum of linezolid was compared to numerous agents including glycopeptides, quinupristin/dalfopristin, beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones when testing 2,640 strains by the standardized disk diffusion method or Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden). The linezolid spectrum was complete against staphylococci (median zone diameter, 29 - 32 mm), as was the spectrum of vancomycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin. Among the enterococci, no linezolid resistance was detected, and the susceptibility rate was 93.1 - 96.4%. Only the vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium strains remained susceptible (92.8%) to quinupristin/dalfopristin. Marked differences in the glycopeptide resistance patterns (van A versus van B) were noted for the 22 isolates of VRE, thus requiring local susceptibility testing to direct therapy. Streptococcus pneumoniae and other species were very susceptible (100.0%) to linezolid, MIC(90) at 0.75 microg/ml. Penicillin non-susceptible rate was 27.7% and erythromycin resistance was at 17.4%. Other streptococci were also completely susceptible to linezolid (MIC(90), 1 microg/ml). These results provide the initial benchmark of potency and spectrum for linezolid in Latin American medical centers. Future comparisons should recognize that the oxazolidinones possess essentially a complete spectrum coverage of the monitored staphylococci, enterococci and streptococcal isolates in 2000-2001. This positions linezolid as the widest spectrum empiric choice against multi-resistant Gram-positive cocci, a spectrum of activity greater than available glycopeptides and the streptogramin combination.

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of (-) and (+) dOTC when administered as an oral racemate.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of racemic dOTC, a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in adult male volunteers. Twelve healthy adult male subjects were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, single-dose crossover study. All were nonsmoking, within 15% of ideal body weight, and between 18 and 50 years of age. Subjects received single oral doses of 800mg racemic dOTC, in random order, either fed or fasted. The meal given to fed subjects was the standard Food and Drug Administration high-fat breakfast, and all subjects completed both study periods. Sixteen plasma samples for pharmacokinetic assessments were collected for 72 hours following dosing and assayed for (-) and (+) dOTC concentrations. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to maximum concentration (tm) were determined for each enantiomer by standard noncompartmental techniques. Statistical hypothesis testing was by Wilcoxon signed rank, and the two one-sided tests procedure was used to determine bioequivalence between thefed and fasted study periods. The only effect of coadministration of racemic dOTC with food was a delay in time to peak concentration (t(max) of between 0.6 and 0.7 hours for both (-) and (+) dOTC stereoisomers (p < or =0.02). Neither AUC (p > or = 0.10) nor Cmax (p > or = 0.35) differed significantly between the fed and fasted study periods for either (-) or (+) dOTC. Both AUC and Cmax were equivalent between the fed and fasted study periods. It was concluded that there is no clinically significant effect of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics of either (-) or (+) dOTC when administered orally as a racemic mixture.

A multicenter evaluation of linezolid antimicrobial activity in North America.

Overall, 141 centers in North America enrolled in this international surveillance study designed to evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial activity and spectrum of linezolid, a new oxazolidinone. Each participant tested the susceptibility of clinical isolates of staphylococcal species (n = 85) against 12 drugs, and enterococcal species (n = 40) against 6 drugs using reference broth microdilution trays; and of streptococcal species (n = 25) against 6 drugs using Etests (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden). Quality control testing was conducted using recommended strains, and verification of resistance to linezolid and select other agents was performed by a regional monitor. Of the 20,161 isolates collected from sites across the United States (US; n = 132) and Canada (n = 9), 18,307 were included in this analysis. Oxacillin resistance occurred in 38.7 and 70.6% of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) isolates, respectively. Vancomycin resistance was reported in 65.9 and 2.6% of Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis, respectively. Penicillin resistance occurred in 37.2% of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 17.5% constituting high-level resistance (MIC, > or =2 microg/ml). The MIC(90) for linezolid was 1 microg/ml for streptococci, 2 microg/ml for enterococci and CoNS isolates, and 4 microg/ml for S. aureus. Using the US FDA-recommended susceptible breakpoints for linezolid, there were no confirmed reports of linezolid resistance (i.e., MIC > or =8 microg/ml). The occurrence of linezolid MICs was unimodal and generally varied between, 1-4 microg/ml for staphylococci (94% of recorded results), 1-2 microg/ml for enterococci (93%), and 0.5-1 microg/ml for streptococci (85%). Susceptibility to linezolid was not influenced by susceptibility to other antiicrobials such as vancomycin, beta-lactams or macrolides. Only linezolid was universally active against essentially all tested Gram-positive specimens. The unimodal susceptibility pattern is indicative of excellent and near complete activity against key Gram-positive pathogens including multiply resistant strains, but surveillance for emerging resistances (rare) and the performance of routine susceptibility tests to guide patient therapy seems prudent.

Multicenter assessment of the linezolid spectrum and activity using the disk diffusion and Etest methods: report of the Zyvox(R) antimicrobial potency study in Latin America (LA-ZAPS)

Linezolid was the first clinically applied member of the new antimicrobial class called the oxazolidinones. These agents have a powerful spectrum of activity focussed against Gram-positive organisms including strains with documented resistances to other antimicrobial classes. We conducted a multicenter surveillance (Zyvox Antimicrobial Potency Study; ZAPS) trial of qualifying Gram-positive isolates from 24 medical centers in eight countries in Latin America. The activity and spectrum of linezolid was compared to numerous agents including glycopeptides, quinupristin/dalfopristin, beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones when testing 2,640 strains by the standardized disk diffusion method or Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden). The linezolid spectrum was complete against staphylococci (median zone diameter, 29 - 32 mm), as was the spectrum of vancomycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin. Among the enterococci, no linezolid resistance was detected, and the susceptibility rate was 93.1 - 96.4. Only the vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium strains remained susceptible (92.8) to quinupristin/dalfopristin. Marked differences in the glycopeptide resistance patterns (van A versus van B) were noted for the 22 isolates of VRE, thus requiring local susceptibility testing to direct therapy. Streptococcus pneumoniae and other species were very susceptible (100.0) to linezolid, MIC(90) at 0.75 microg/ml. Penicillin non-susceptible rate was 27.7 and erythromycin resistance was at 17.4. Other streptococci were also completely susceptible to linezolid (MIC(90), 1 microg/ml). These results provide the initial benchmark of potency and spectrum for linezolid in Latin American medical centers. Future comparisons should recognize that the oxazolidinones possess essentially a complete spectrum coverage of the monitored staphylococci, enterococci and streptococcal isolates in 2000-2001. This positions linezolid as the widest spectrum empiric choice against multi-resistant Gram-positive cocci, a spectrum of activity greater than available glycopeptides and the streptogramin combination.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Quinupristin/Dalfopristin tested against Gram-positive Cocci from Latin America: results from the global SMART (GSMART) surveillance study

Gram-positive cocci are important causes of both nosocomial and community-acquired infections, and antimicrobial resistance among these pathogens has become an important problem worldwide. Since resistance among these organisms can vary substantially by geographic location, we conducted a multicenter surveillance study with isolates from live Latin American countries (15 medical centers). Quinupristin/dalfopristin (formerly RP-59500) is a novel streptogramin combination with focused activity against Gram-positive cocci, many exhibiting emerging resistance. The in vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin and 12 other antimicrobial agents were evaluated against 1,948 strains including Staphycoccus aureus (747 strains), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS;446 strains), enterococci (429 strains), and various Streptococcus spp.(326 strains). Oxacillin resistance was observed in 41 percent of S. aureus (MIC,<2µg/ml or >13mm) and 40 percent of CoNS (MIC,<0.25µg/ml or >18mm). Vancomycin, teicoplanin, and quinupristin/dalfopristin (MIC90,,0.25-1µg/ml remained effective against all strains, but cross-resistance was high among other tested drugs. The quinupristin/dalfopristin MIC50 for Streptococcus pneumoniae and other streptococci was only 0.5µg/ml (13 percent to 28 percent were penicillin-resistant; 12 percent to 22 percent were macrolide-resistant). Enterococci demostrated variable inhibition by quinupristin/dalfopristin depending upon identification and the susceptibility testing method used. The demonstrated quinupristin/dalfopristin activity against Enterococcus faecium was confirmed, but potential species identification errors with various commercial systems continue to confuse susceptibility statistics, even though some strains of E. faecium confirmed by PCR-based or other molecular identification technique did have quinupristin/dalfopristin MICs of>4µg/mL. Most important, glycopeptide-resistant enterococci are rapidly emerging in Latin America, and quinupristin/dalfopristin appears active against many of these isolates as well as having potency against nearly all staphylococci and streptococci tested at<2µg/ml or having a zone diameter of>116mm. Comparisons to GSMART results from other continents show nerly identifical quinupristin/dalfopristin activity for each Gram-positive species tested. These results define the role of quinupristin/dalfopristin in Latin American medical centers and provide a bechmark for future in vitro comparisons.

A Double-Blind, Randomized Comparison of Aztreonam Plus Clindamycin with Tobramycin Plus Clindamycin in Abdominal Infections.

Seventy patients with intraabdominal infections were randomly assigned in double-blinded fashion to receive either the combination of tobramycin plus clindamycin (TM/C) or aztreonam plus clindamycin (AZ/C). Thirty-four patients received AZ/C and 36 were given TM/C. Average ages were 62 years (TM/C) and 66 years (AZ/C). In approximately one-half of both groups, the source of infection was perforated colon or perforated appendix. There were no significant differences in demographic factors between these groups, although those given AZ/C had a more serious long-term prognosis due to underlying diseases. The average lengths of treatment were 10 days (TM/C) and 9 days (AZ/C). Clinical response to therapy did not differ, as 84% of the TM/C patients and 78% of the AZ/C patients had satisfactory clinical responses. The two regimens differed in adverse effects, as an elevated PT/PTT was more frequently (p < 0.05) observed in AZ/C. All PT/PTT elevations responded to injections of vitamin K, and no serious bleeding occurred. Choice between these regimens depends on differences in cost and the risk of adverse effects, as both regimens appear equally effective for treatment of abdominal infections in conjunction with appropriate surgical intervention.