Interaction of isolated cross-linked short actin oligomers with the skeletal muscle myosin motor domain.

The cyclical interaction between F-actin and myosin in muscle cells generates contractile force. The myosin motor domain hydrolyses ATP, resulting in conformational changes that are amplified by the myosin lever arm that links the motor domain to the rod domain. Recent cryo-electron microscopic data have provided a clear picture of the myosin-ATP-F-actin complex, but structural insights into other stages of the myosin-actin interaction have been less forthcoming. To address this issue, we cross-linked F-actin subunits between Cys374 and Lys191, and separated them by gel filtration. Purified actin-dimers, -trimers and -tetramers retained the ability to polymerize and to stimulate myosin-subfragment 1 (myosin-S1) ATPase activity. To generate stable actin oligomer:myosin-S1 complexes, we blocked actin polymerization with gelsolin and Clostridium botulinum iota toxin-mediated ADP-ribosylation. After polymerization inhibition, actin-trimers and -tetramers retained the ability to stimulate the myosin-S1-ATPase, whereas the actin-dimer showed very little ATPase stimulation. We then analysed the stoichiometry and binding affinity of myosin-S1 to actin oligomers. Actin-trimers and -tetramers bound myosin-S1 in the absence of nucleotide; the trimer contains one myosin-S1 binding site. We calculated a dissociation constant (Kd ) of 1.1 × 10-10  m and 1.9 × 10-10  m for binding of native F-actin and the actin-trimer to myosin-S1, respectively. EM of the actin-trimer:myosin-S1 complex demonstrated the presence of single particles of uniform size. Image reconstruction allowed a reasonable fit of the actin-trimer and myosin-S1 into the obtained density clearly showing binding of one myosin-S1 molecule to the two long-pitch actins of the trimer, supporting the kinetic data.

Cross-linked long-pitch actin dimer forms stoichiometric complexes with gelsolin segment 1 and/or deoxyribonuclease I that nonproductively interact with myosin subfragment 1.

Actin dimer cross-linked along the long pitch of the F-actin helix by N-(4-azido)-2-nitrophenyl (ANP) was purified by gel filtration. Purified dimers were found to polymerize on increasing the ionic strength, although at reduced rate and extent in comparison with native actin. Purified actin dimer interacts with the actin-binding proteins (ABPs) deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) and gelsolin segment-1 (G1) as analyzed by gel filtration and native gel electrophoresis. Complex formation of the actin dimer with these ABPs inhibits its ability to polymerize. The interaction with rabbit skeletal muscle myosin subfragment 1 (S1) was analyzed for polymerized actin dimer and dimer complexed with gelsolin segment 1 or DNase I by measurement of the actin-stimulated myosin S1-ATPase and gel filtration. The data obtained indicate binding of subfragment 1 to actin dimer, albeit with considerably lower affinity than to F-actin. Polymerized actin dimer was able to stimulate the S1-ATPase activity to about 50% of the level of native F-actin. In contrast, the actin dimer complexed to DNase I or gelsolin segment 1 or to both proteins was unable to significantly stimulate the S1-ATPase. Similarly, G1:dimer complex at 20 microM stimulated the rate of release of subfragment 1 bound nucleotide (mant-ADP) only 1.6-fold in comparison to about 9-fold by native F-actin at a concentration of 0.5 microM. Using rapid kinetic techniques, a dissociation constant of 2.4 x 10 (-6) M for subfragment 1 binding to G1:dimer was determined in comparison to 3 x 10 (-8) M for native F-actin under identical conditions. Since the rate of association of subfragment 1 to G1:dimer was considerably lower than to native F-actin, we suspect that the ATP-hydrolysis by S1 was catalyzed before its association to the dimer. These data suggest an altered, nonproductive mode for the interaction of subfragment 1 with the isolated long-pitch actin dimer.

Mapping the ADF/cofilin binding site on monomeric actin by competitive cross-linking and peptide array: evidence for a second binding site on monomeric actin.

The binding sites for actin depolymerising factor (ADF) and cofilin on G-actin have been mapped by competitive chemical cross-linking using deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I), gelsolin segment 1 (G1), thymosin beta4 (Tbeta4), and vitamin D-binding protein (DbP). To reduce ADF/cofilin induced actin oligomerisation we used ADP-ribosylated actin. Both vitamin D-binding protein and thymosin beta4 inhibit binding by ADF or cofilin, while cofilin or ADF and DNase I bind simultaneously. Competition was observed between ADF or cofilin and G1, supporting the hypothesis that cofilin preferentially binds in the cleft between sub-domains 1 and 3, similar to or overlapping the binding site of G1. Because the affinity of G1 is much higher than that of ADF or cofilin, even at a 20-fold excess of the latter, the complexes contained predominantly G1. Nevertheless, cross-linking studies using actin:G1 complexes and ADF or cofilin showed the presence of low concentrations of ternary complexes containing both ADF or cofilin and G1. Thus, even with monomeric actin, it is shown for the first time that binding sites for both G1 and ADF or cofilin can be occupied simultaneously, confirming the existence of two separate binding sites. Employing a peptide array with overlapping sequences of actin overlaid by cofilin, we have identified five sequence stretches of actin able to bind cofilin. These sequences are located within the regions of F-actin predicted to bind cofilin in the model derived from image reconstructions of electron microscopical images of cofilin-decorated filaments. Three of the peptides map to the cleft region between sub-domains 1 and 3 of the upper actin along the two-start long-pitch helix, while the other two are in the DNase I loop corresponding to the site of the lower actin in the helix. In the absence of any crystal structures of ADF or cofilin in complex with actin, these studies provide further information about the binding sites on F-actin for these important actin regulatory proteins.

Nuclear localisation of the G-actin sequestering peptide thymosin beta4.

Thymosin beta4 is regarded as the main G-actin sequestering peptide in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. It is also thought to be involved in cellular events like cancerogenesis, apoptosis, angiogenesis, blood coagulation and wound healing. Thymosin beta4 has been previously reported to localise intracellularly to the cytoplasm as detected by immunofluorescence. It can be selectively labelled at two of its glutamine-residues with fluorescent Oregon Green cadaverine using transglutaminase; however, this labelling does not interfere with its interaction with G-actin. Here we show that after microinjection into intact cells, fluorescently labelled thymosin beta4 has a diffuse cytoplasmic and a pronounced nuclear staining. Enzymatic cleavage of fluorescently labelled thymosin beta4 with AsnC-endoproteinase yielded two mono-labelled fragments of the peptide. After microinjection of these fragments, only the larger N-terminal fragment, containing the proposed actin-binding sequence exhibited nuclear localisation, whereas the smaller C-terminal fragment remained confined to the cytoplasm. We further showed that in digitonin permeabilised and extracted cells, fluorescent thymosin beta4 was solely localised within the cytoplasm, whereas it was found concentrated within the cell nuclei after an additional Triton X100 extraction. Therefore, we conclude that thymosin beta4 is specifically translocated into the cell nucleus by an active transport mechanism, requiring an unidentified soluble cytoplasmic factor. Our data furthermore suggest that this peptide may also serve as a G-actin sequestering peptide in the nucleus, although additional nuclear functions cannot be excluded.

Interaction of myosin subfragment 1 with forms of monomeric actin.

The ability of myosin subfragment 1 to interact with monomeric actin complexed to sequestering proteins was tested by a number of different techniques such as affinity absorption, chemical cross-linking, fluorescence titration, and competition procedures. For affinity absorption, actin was attached to agarose immobilized DNase I. Both chymotryptic subfragment 1 isoforms (S1A1 and S1A2) were retained by this affinity matrix. Fluorescence titration employing pyrenyl-actin in complex with deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) or thymosin beta4 demonstrated S1 binding to these actin complexes. A K(D) of 5 x 10(-8) M for S1A1 binding to the actin-DNase I complex was determined. Fluorescence titration did not indicate binding of S1 to actin in complex with gelsolin segment 1 (G1) or vitamin D-binding protein (DBP). However, fluorescence competition experiments and analysis of tryptic cleavage patterns of S1 indicated its interaction with actin in complex with DBP or G1. Formation of the ternary DNase I-acto-S1 complex was directly demonstrated by sucrose density sedimentation. S1 binding to G-actin was found to be sensitive to ATP and an increase in ionic strength. Actin fixed in its monomeric state by DNase I was unable to significantly stimulate the Mg2+-dependent S1-ATPase activity. Both wild-type and a mutant of Dictyostelium discoideum myosin II subfragment 1 containing 12 additional lysine residues within an insertion of 20 residues into loop 2 (K12/20-Q532E) were found to also interact with actin-DNase I complex. Binding of the K12/20-Q532E mutant to the actin-DNase I complex occurred with higher affinity than wild-type S1 and was less sensitive to mono- and divalent cations.

Polymerisation of chemically cross-linked actin:thymosin beta(4) complex to filamentous actin: alteration in helical parameters and visualisation of thymosin beta(4) binding on F-actin.

The beta-thymosins are intracellular monomeric (G-)actin sequestering proteins forming 1:1 complexes with G-actin. Here, we analysed the interaction of thymosin beta(4) with F-actin. Thymosin beta(4) at 200 microM was chemically cross-linked to F-actin. In the presence of phalloidin, the chemically cross-linked actin:thymosin beta(4) complex was incorporated into F-actin. These mixed filaments were of normal appearance when inspected by conventional transmission electron microscopy after negative staining. We purified the chemically cross-linked actin:thymosin beta(4) complex, which polymerised only when phalloidin and the gelsolin:2-actin complex were present simultaneously. Using scanning transmission electron microscopy, the mass-per-length of control and actin:thymosin beta(4) filaments was found to be 16.0(+/-0.8) kDa/nm and 18.0(+/-0.9) kDa/nm, respectively, indicating an increase in subunit mass of 5.4 kDa. Analysis of the helical parameters revealed an increase of the crossover spacing of the two right-handed long-pitch helical strands from 36.0 to 40.5 nm. Difference map analysis of 3-D helical reconstruction of control and actin:thymosin beta(4) filaments yielded an elongated extra mass. Qualitatively, the overall size and shape of the difference mass were compatible with published data of the atomic structure of thymosin beta(4). The deduced binding sites of thymosin beta(4) to actin were in agreement with those identified previously. However, parts of the difference map might represent subtle conformational changes of both proteins occurring upon complex formation.