Single-Session Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Postural Stability and Reduces Ataxia Symptoms in Spinocerebellar Ataxia.

Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) results in balance and coordination impairment, and current treatments have limited efficacy. Recent evidence suggests that combining postural training with cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) can improve these symptoms. However, the combined effects of ctDCS and postural training on individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia remain underexplored. Ten volunteers with (SCA type 3) participated in a triple-blind, randomized, crossover study to receive a single session of ctDCS (2 mA for 20 min) and a sham ctDCS session separated by at least one week. The Biodex Balance System was used to assess balance at each session, measuring overall stability index, anteroposterior stability index, and medial-lateral stability index. As secondary outcomes, cerebellar ataxia symptoms were evaluated using the 8-item Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia. The assessments were conducted before and after each session. The results indicated that ctDCS enhanced the overall stability index when compared to sham ctDCS (Z = -2.10, p = 0.03), although it did not significantly affect the anteroposterior or medial-lateral stability indices. Compared to the baseline, a single session of ctDCS reduced appendicular symptoms related to cerebellar ataxia, as evidenced by improvements in the nose-finger test (Z = -2.07, p = 0.04), fast alternating hand movements (Z = -2.15, p = 0.03), and heel-to-shin slide (Z = -1.91, p = 0.05). In conclusion, our study suggests that a single session of ctDCS, in combination with postural training, can enhance balance and alleviate ataxia symptoms in individuals with cerebellar ataxia. This study was approved by the local research ethics committee (No. 2.877.813) and registered on clinicaltrials.org (NCT04039048 - https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04039048 ) on 2019-07-28.

Do Higher Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Doses Lead to Greater Gains in Upper Limb Motor Function in Post-Stroke Patients?

Objective: To investigate whether a higher number of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) sessions results in a greater improvement in upper limb function in chronic post-stroke patients. Materials and methods: A randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 57 chronic post-stroke patients (≥ 3 months after their injuries). The patients were allocated to receive sessions of tDCS combined with physiotherapy and divided into three groups (anodal, cathodal, and sham). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) was used to assess the sensorimotor impairment of the patients' upper limbs before (baseline) and after five and ten sessions. The percentage of patients who achieved a clinically significant improvement (> five points on the FMA-UE) was also analyzed. Results: The FMA-UE score increased after five and ten sessions in both the anodal and cathodal tDCS groups, respectively, compared to the baseline. However, in the sham group, the FMA-UE score increased only after ten sessions. When compared to the sham group, the mean difference from the baseline after five sessions was higher in the anodal tDCS group. The percentage of individuals who achieved greater clinical improvement was higher in the stimulation groups than in the sham group and after ten sessions when compared to five sessions. Conclusions: Our results suggest that five tDCS sessions are sufficient to augment the effect of standard physiotherapy on upper limb function recovery in chronic post-stroke patients, and ten sessions resulted in greater gains.

Classification of Parkinson's disease motor phenotype: a machine learning approach.

To assess the cortical activity in people with Parkinson's disease (PwP) with different motor phenotype (tremor-dominant-TD and postural instability and gait difficulty-PIGD) and to compare with controls. Twenty-four PwP (during OFF and ON medication) and twelve age-/sex-/handedness-matched healthy controls underwent electrophysiological assessment of spectral ratio analysis through electroencephalography (EEG) at resting state and during the hand movement. We performed a machine learning method with 35 attributes extracted from EEG. To verify the efficiency of the proposed phenotype-based EEG classification the random forest and random tree were tested (performed 30 times, using a tenfolds cross validation in Weka environment). The analyses based on phenotypes indicated a slowing down of cortical activity during OFF medication state in PwP. PD with TD phenotype presented this characteristic at resting and the individuals with PIGD presented during the hand movement. During the ON state, there is no difference between phenotypes at resting nor during the hand movement. PD phenotypes may influence spectral activity measured by EEG. Random forest machine learning provides a slightly more accurate, sensible and specific approach to distinguish different PD phenotypes. The phenotype of PD might be a clinical characteristic that could influence cortical activity.

Intrahemispheric EEG: A New Perspective for Quantitative EEG Assessment in Poststroke Individuals.

The ratio between slower and faster frequencies of brain activity may change after stroke. However, few studies have used quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) index of ratios between slower and faster frequencies such as the delta/alpha ratio (DAR) and the power ratio index (PRI; delta + theta/alpha + beta) for investigating the difference between the affected and unaffected hemisphere poststroke. Here, we proposed a new perspective for analyzing DAR and PRI within each hemisphere and investigated the motor impairment-related interhemispheric frequency oscillations. Forty-seven poststroke subjects and twelve healthy controls were included in the study. Severity of upper limb motor impairment was classified according to the Fugl-Meyer assessment in mild/moderate (n = 25) and severe (n = 22). The qEEG indexes (PRI and DAR) were computed for each hemisphere (intrahemispheric index) and for both hemispheres (cerebral index). Considering the cerebral index (DAR and PRI), our results showed a slowing in brain activity in poststroke patients when compared to healthy controls. Only the intrahemispheric PRI index was able to find significant interhemispheric differences of frequency oscillations. Despite being unable to detect interhemispheric differences, the DAR index seems to be more sensitive to detect motor impairment-related frequency oscillations. The intrahemispheric PRI index may provide insights into therapeutic approaches for interhemispheric asymmetry after stroke.

Applications of Non-invasive Neuromodulation for the Management of Disorders Related to COVID-19.

Background: Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) morbidity is not restricted to the respiratory system, but also affects the nervous system. Non-invasive neuromodulation may be useful in the treatment of the disorders associated with COVID-19. Objective: To describe the rationale and empirical basis of the use of non-invasive neuromodulation in the management of patients with COVID-10 and related disorders. Methods: We summarize COVID-19 pathophysiology with emphasis of direct neuroinvasiveness, neuroimmune response and inflammation, autonomic balance and neurological, musculoskeletal and neuropsychiatric sequela. This supports the development of a framework for advancing applications of non-invasive neuromodulation in the management COVID-19 and related disorders. Results: Non-invasive neuromodulation may manage disorders associated with COVID-19 through four pathways: (1) Direct infection mitigation through the stimulation of regions involved in the regulation of systemic anti-inflammatory responses and/or autonomic responses and prevention of neuroinflammation and recovery of respiration; (2) Amelioration of COVID-19 symptoms of musculoskeletal pain and systemic fatigue; (3) Augmenting cognitive and physical rehabilitation following critical illness; and (4) Treating outbreak-related mental distress including neurological and psychiatric disorders exacerbated by surrounding psychosocial stressors related to COVID-19. The selection of the appropriate techniques will depend on the identified target treatment pathway. Conclusion: COVID-19 infection results in a myriad of acute and chronic symptoms, both directly associated with respiratory distress (e.g., rehabilitation) or of yet-to-be-determined etiology (e.g., fatigue). Non-invasive neuromodulation is a toolbox of techniques that based on targeted pathways and empirical evidence (largely in non-COVID-19 patients) can be investigated in the management of patients with COVID-19.

Baseline Motor Impairment Predicts Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Physical Therapy-Induced Improvement in Individuals with Chronic Stroke.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can enhance the effect of conventional therapies in post-stroke neurorehabilitation. The ability to predict an individual's potential for tDCS-induced recovery may permit rehabilitation providers to make rational decisions about who will be a good candidate for tDCS therapy. We investigated the clinical and biological characteristics which might predict tDCS plus physical therapy effects on upper limb motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. A cohort of 80 chronic stroke individuals underwent ten to fifteen sessions of tDCS plus physical therapy. The sensorimotor function of the upper limb was assessed by means of the upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer scale (UE-FM), before and after treatment. A backward stepwise regression was used to assess the effect of age, sex, time since stroke, brain lesion side, and basal level of motor function on UE-FM improvement after treatment. Following the intervention, UE-FM significantly improved (p < 0.05), and the magnitude of the change was clinically important (mean 6.2 points, 95% CI: 5.2-7.4). The baseline level of UE-FM was the only significant predictor (R 2 = 0.90, F (1, 76) = 682.80, p < 0.001) of tDCS response. These findings may help to guide clinical decisions according to the profile of each patient. Future studies should investigate whether stroke severity affects the effectiveness of tDCS combined with physical therapy.

Aula - 30' na atenção primária à saúde: acolhimento e classificação de risco da pessoa com Covid-19

A aula aborda: -Recomendações para Adequação das Equipes de Saúde -Manejo Clínico na APS/ESF -Atuação nas UBS -Casos Clínicos -Considerações sobre a COVIS-19

Interhemispheric asymmetry of the motor cortex excitability in stroke: relationship with sensory-motor impairment and injury chronicity.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the interhemispheric asymmetry of the motor cortex excitability of chronic stroke patients with healthy and to observe if the magnitude of this asymmetry is associated to sensory-motor impairment and stroke chronicity. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed with chronic stroke and aged and sex-matched healthy individuals. The interhemispheric asymmetry index was calculated by the difference of rest motor threshold (rMT) of the brain hemispheres. The rMT was assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cortical representation of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. To investigate the relationship of the asymmetry with sensory-motor impairment and injury chronicity, the stroke patients were grouped according to the level of sensory-motor impairment (mild/moderate, moderate/severe, and severe) and different chronicity stages (> 3-12, 13-24, 25-60, and > 60 months since stroke). RESULTS: Fifty-six chronic stroke and twenty-six healthy were included. We found higher interhemispheric asymmetry in stroke patients (mean, 27.1 ± 20.9) compared to healthy (mean, 4.9 ± 4.7). The asymmetry was higher in patients with moderate/severe (mean, 35.4 ± 20.4) and severe (mean, 32.9 ± 22.7) impairment. No difference was found between patients with mild/moderate impairment (mean, 15.5 ± 12.5) and healthy. There were no differences of the interhemispheric asymmetry between patients with different times since stroke (> 3-12, mean, 32 ± 18.1; > 13-24, mean, 20.7 ± 16.2; > 25-60, mean, 29.6 ± 18.1; > 60 months, mean, 25.9 ± 17.5). CONCLUSION: Stroke patients showed higher interhemispheric asymmetry of the motor cortex excitability when compared to healthy, and the magnitude of this asymmetry seems to be correlated with the severity of sensory-motor impairment, but not with stroke chronicity. SIGNIFICANCE: Higher interhemispheric asymmetry was found in stroke patients with greatest sensory-motor impairment.

Cortical excitability variability: Insights into biological and behavioral characteristics of healthy individuals.

Motor threshold (MT) measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has diagnostic utility in central nervous system disorders. Its diagnostic sensitivity may be enhanced by identification of non-pathological factors which may influence this measure. The aim of this study was to provide a description of MT variability across physiological and non-pathological behaviour characteristics in a large cohort, including hemispheric asymmetries. In a cross-sectional study, age, handedness, physical activity level, body mass index, gender/menstrual cycle phase, glycemic index and degree of stress were collected from 115 healthy participants. The resting MT of the first dorsal interosseous muscle to TMS was recorded in both hemispheres and served as an indicator of the cortical excitability level. Repeated measures ANOVAs revealed higher MT values in the non-dominant hemisphere, elderly people, stressed individuals and women with amenorrhea. Other biological and behavioral individual characteristics did not influence cortical excitability. Although the degree of interhemispheric difference varied (range: 0.2 to 4.3), depending on biological and behavioral characteristics, this variation was not significant (0.1 ≤ p ≤ 0.8). In conclusion, MT varied considerably between subjects. The difference between the hemisphere excitability that was less influenced by external factors, may be an alternative method of TMS measure to identify pathological changes of cortical excitability.

Evidence of the Homeostatic Regulation With the Combination of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Physical Activity.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can optimize beneficial effects induced by motor practice in patients with neurological disorders. However, possibly because of homeostatic regulation, the conditioning effects of tDCS are often imprecise and variable, limiting its therapeutic application. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore the magnitude and direction of the after effects induced by physical activity (PA) on tDCS-preconditioned cortical excitability (CE). DESIGN: First, a crossover experiment was performed with 12 subjects to determine whether a single session of low-, moderate-, and high-intensity PA on a treadmill modulates the motor CE measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation. In a second crossover experiment, we investigated long-lasting changes (until 90 mins) of the effects induced by PA (with intensities defined by the first experiment) on motor CE after the subject had been preconditioned by tDCS (using different polarities). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In experiment 1, we found that high- and moderate-intensity PA modulate the CE. Experiment 2 demonstrated that preconditioning the CE using tDCS homeostatically changes the direction and magnitude of after effects induced by subsequent PA plasticity caused by motor activity. In conclusion, the results suggest that the direction of after effects induced by the combination of physical exercise with tDCS on the CE is regulated within a physiologically defined range.

Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with gait training in Parkinson's disease: A pilot randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cueing gait training (CGT) on functional mobility in patients with Parkinson´s disease (PD). METHODS: A pilot double-blind controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted with 22 patients with PD assigned to the experimental (anodal tDCS plus CGT) and control group (sham tDCS plus CGT). The primary outcome (functional mobility) was assessed by 10-m walk test, cadence, stride length, and Timed Up and Go test. Motor impairment, bradykinesia, balance, and quality of life were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were observed when assessing outcome data. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated similar gains in all outcome measures, except for the stride length. The number of participants who showed MCID was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: The CGT provided many benefits to functional mobility, motor impairment, bradykinesia, balance, and quality of life. However, these effect magnitudes were not influenced by stimulation, but tDCS seems to prolong the effects of cueing therapy on functional mobility.

Estimulação cerebral não invasiva excitatória sobre a atenção de adultos com sintomas do transtorno de déficit de atenção e hiperatividade / Excitatory non-invasive brain stimulation over attention of adults with symptoms of Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

Objetivos: avaliar a atenção de adultos com sintomas de transtorno de déficit de atenção e hiperatividade (TDAH), quando submetidos a técnicas de estimulação cerebral não invasiva (ECNI) excitatória. Métodos: nesse estudo crossover 20 voluntários foram submetidos a uma sessão real e uma sham de Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana Repetitiva (EMTr) ou Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua (ETCC). A EMTr (10Hz) foi aplicada no córtex dorsolateral esquerdo. A ETCC foi aplicada colocando-se o ânodo no mesmo local e cátodo na região supraorbital contralateral (1mA e 20 minutos). A avaliação foi realizada através de testes neuropsicológicos, considerando os desfechos: atenção focada e sustentada; amplitude atencional, manipulação mental e resistência à interferência. Resultados: observou-se que a ECNI excitatória exerceu efeito distinto entre os grupos, prejudicando o desempenho atencional dos adultos saudáveis e beneficiando os pacientes com TDAH. Destaca-se que em relação à estimulação sham o grupo controle aumentou o desempenho atencional de forma significativa, possivelmente decorrente do efeito de aprendizagem, enquanto o grupo com TDAH só obteve aumento no desempenho após a aplicação da estimulação real. Conclusão: os achados ratificam a compreensão que a ECNI excitatória pode contribuir para melhora cognitiva em adultos com TDAH e sugerem que processo inverso pode acontecer em relação aos saudáveis.

Purpose: evaluate the attentional performance of adults with symptoms of Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) when submitted to excitatory non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS). Methods: a crossover design were performed with 20 volunteers underwent to a real session and sham session using repetitive Transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The rTMS (10Hz) was applied over left dorsolateral cortex. The tDCS was applied in the same place and the cathode over the contralateral orbital region (1mA and 20 minutes). The evaluation was done trought the neuropsycologhical tests regarding the following outcomes: focused and sustained attention; Attentional amplitude, mental manipulation (and resistance to interference. Results: it was observed that excitatory stimulation induces a distinct effect between groups, harming the atentional performance of health adults and improving the performance of the subjects with Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. It is important to highlight that the sham stimulation in control group increase the attentional performance, possible due the learning effect. In the other hand, the group with Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms only has an increase in performance after the real stimulation. Conclusion: this findings help in urderstading of excitatory NIBS could contribute to improve the cognitive performance in adults with ADHD and the opposite can happen with healthy subjects.

Intensity-dependent effects of cycling exercise on corticospinal excitability in healthy humans: a pilot study

Abstract Aims the aim of this study was to verify the effects of different intensities of locomotor exercise on corticospinal excitability. Methods 18 healthy subjects (27.6 ± 6.5 years,) participated in a design study of three different exercise protocols on a cycle ergometer: (i) 10 min at 75% Wmax (high intensity); (ii) 15min at 60% Wmax (moderate intensity) or (iii) 30 min at 45% Wmax (low intensity). The protocols of lower body cycling were assigned in random order in separate sessions. A control session was done with subjects at rest. Corticospinal excitability was assessed before (baseline) and every 5 min for 15min after the end of exercise/rest (time: 0, 5, 10 and 15) by measurement of the motor evoked potential (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the relaxed first-dorsal interosseus muscle. Results Compared to the resting session, a significant decrease (64%) in the motor evoked potential amplitudes was found only in the session of exercise of high intensity. This result seems depend on the level of physical activity of subject. No change was found after rest, low and moderate exercises. Conclusions These findings suggest that changes in the corticospinal excitability depend on exercise intensity and level of physical activity of subjects.(AU)

MirrARbilitation: A clinically-related gesture recognition interactive tool for an AR rehabilitation system.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Interactive systems for rehabilitation have been widely investigated for motivational purposes. However, more attention should be given to the manner in which user movements are recognized and categorized. This paper aims to evaluate the efficacy of using a clinically-related gesture recognition tool, based on the international biomechanical standards (ISB) for the reporting of human joint motion, for the development of an interactive augmented reality (AR) rehabilitation system -mirrARbilitation. METHODS: This work presents an AR rehabilitation system based on ISB standards, which enables the system to interact and to be configured according to therapeutic needs. The Kinect(TM) skeleton tracking technology was exploited and a new movement recognition method was developed to recognize and classify biomechanical movements. Further, our mirrARbilitation system provides exercise instructions while simultaneously motivating the patient. The system was evaluated on a cohort of 33 patients, physiotherapists, and software developers when performing shoulder abduction therapy exercises. Tests were performed in three moments: (i) users performed the exercise until they feel tired without the help of the system, (ii) the same however using the mirrARbilitation for motivation and guidance, and (iii) users performed the exercise again without the system. Users performing the movement without the help of the system worked as baseline reference. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the percentage of correct exercises, measured by the movement analysis method we developed, improved from 69.02% to 93.73% when users interacted with the mirrARbilitation. The number of exercise repetitions also improved from 34.06 to 66.09 signifying that our system increased motivation of the users. The system also prevented the users from performing the exercises in a completely wrong manner. Finally, with the help of our system the users' worst result was performing 73.68% of the rehabilitation movements correctly. Besides the engagement, these results suggest that the use of biomechanical standards to recognize movements is valuable in guiding users during rehabilitation exercises. CONCLUSION: The proposed system proved to be efficient by improving the user engagement and exercise performance outcomes. The results also suggest that the use of biomechanical standards to recognize movements is valuable in guiding users during rehabilitation exercises.

The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This pilot double-blind sham-controlled randomized trial aimed to determine if the addition of anodal tDCS on the affected hemisphere or cathodal tDCS on unaffected hemisphere to modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) would be superior to constraints therapy alone in improving upper limb function in chronic stroke patients. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to receive 12 sessions of either (i) anodal, (ii) cathodal or (iii) sham tDCS combined with mCIMT. Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), motor activity log scale (MAL), and handgrip strength were analyzed before, immediately, and 1 month (follow-up) after the treatment. Minimal clinically important difference (mCID) was defined as an increase of ≥5.25 in the upper limb FMA. RESULTS: An increase in the FMA scores between the baseline and post-intervention and follow-up for active tDCS group was observed, whereas no difference was observed in the sham group. At post-intervention and follow-up, when compared with the sham group, only the anodal tDCS group achieved an improvement in the FMA scores. ANOVA showed that all groups demonstrated similar improvement over time for MAL and handgrip strength. In the active tDCS groups, 7/7 (anodal tDCS) 5/7 (cathodal tDCS) of patients experienced mCID against 3/7 in the sham group. CONCLUSION: The results support the merit of association of mCIMT with brain stimulation to augment clinical gains in rehabilitation after stroke. However, the anodal tDCS seems to have greater impact than the cathodal tDCS in increasing the mCIMT effects on motor function of chronic stroke patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The association of mCIMT with brain stimulation improves clinical gains in rehabilitation after stroke. The improvement in motor recovery (assessed by Fugl-Meyer scale) was only observed after anodal tDCS. The modulation of damaged hemisphere demonstrated greater improvements than the modulation of unaffected hemispheres.

Transcranial direct current stimulation: before, during, or after motor training?

Noninvasive brain stimulation has recently been used to augment motor training-induced plasticity. However, the exact time during which noninvasive brain stimulation can be combined with motor therapy to maximize neuroplasticity and behavioral changes is unknown. We conducted a randomized sham-controlled crossover trial to examine when (before, during, or after training) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) should be applied to best reinforce motor training-induced plasticity in 12 healthy right-handed participants (mean age: 21.8±1.6) who underwent active or sham tDCS combined with motor training. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-elicited motor-evoked potentials from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle were recorded before (baseline) and immediately after each session. The training task comprised four practice trials - 3 min each (30 s pause between trials) - of repetitive finger movements (thumb abduction/adduction) with the right hand. Anodal tDCS (1 mA, 13 min, on the motor primary cortex) was applied before, during, and after the training. Compared with baseline motor-evoked potentials and the sham condition, tDCS that was applied before, but not during or after, the motor task enhanced corticospinal excitability. These data suggest that tDCS performed before - not during or after - promotes optimization of motor training-induced plasticity.