Prevalence and Characteristics of Knee Osteoarthritis Among the General Public in Saudi Arabia.

Background Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic and progressive knee joint condition that is influenced by multiple factors. This research aims to examine the prevalence and characteristics of knee OA among the general public in Saudi Arabia. Methodology This cross-sectional online survey was conducted in September 2023 in Saudi Arabia. This research used a previously developed questionnaire to validate the diagnosis of OA, which was performed in accordance with the diagnostic criteria established by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index questionnaire (WOMAC) was used to examine the severity and characteristics of knee OA patients. A binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the variables that influence the severity of knee OA and the likelihood of developing OA. Results A total of 1,019 individuals participated in this study. Around one-third of the participants (34.5%) fulfilled the ACR criteria for knee OA diagnosis. Overall, the mean WOMAC score was 34.1 (18.8) out of 96, which represents 35.5% of the maximum obtainable score and demonstrates a low degree of knee OA severity. The mean pain sub-scale score was 7.4 (3.8) out of 20, which represents 37.0% of the maximum obtainable score and demonstrates a low level of pain intensity. The mean stiffness sub-scale score was 2.7 (1.8) out of 8, which represents 33.8% of the maximum obtainable score and demonstrates a low degree of stiffness in joints. The mean physical function sub-scale score was 24.0 (14.0) out of 68, which represents 35.3% of the maximum obtainable score and demonstrates a low level of physical function difficulty. Females, older participants (above 40 years), those with high body mass index (28.8 kg/cm2 and higher), non-smokers, those with comorbidities, those who did not practice daily physical activity, those who had a family history of knee OA, and those who suffered from flat feet, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, lupus, or back or hip pain were more likely to develop knee OA and have severe OA (p < 0.05). Conclusions The findings of this study demonstrated a significant prevalence rate of knee OA and highlighted a discrepancy between the rates obtained by diagnostic criteria and those determined through clinical diagnosis. Several significant factors that contribute to the development of OA encompass lifestyle choices such as food and exercise, familial predisposition, genetic influences, and the presence of comorbidities. To effectively tackle this intricate matter, it is imperative to adopt a patient-centered strategy and prioritize early intervention.

The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Associated Factors Regarding First Aid Among the General Public in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Accidents may occur at any time and in any location. Unintentional accidents may have life-threatening consequences. Anyone with basic first aid knowledge can assess the situation and intervene to provide proper care. This research aims to assess public knowledge and attitudes toward first aid and its related aspects in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between April and May 2023 to investigate first aid knowledge, attitude, and associated factors among the general public of Saudi Arabia. This study's population consisted of Saudi Arabians aged at least 18 who are part of the general community. This research adapted and used a previously developed questionnaire to evaluate the general public's knowledge, attitudes, and other characteristics about first aid in Saudi Arabia. A binary logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine the variables that influence their knowledge and attitude. RESULTS: A total of 1135 participants were involved in this study. Almost one-third of the study participants (36.0%) reported that they had received training in first aid. The vast majority of the study participants (94.5%) reported that they had heard of first aid before. The media was the most commonly reported source of information on first aid (37.6%). Choking (63.2%), breathing difficulty (61.7%), and fainting (56.7%) were the most commonly reported indications (injuries or accidents) that need first aid. The mean knowledge score for the study participants was 4.4 (SD: 2.8) out of 8 (55.0%), which represents a moderate level of knowledge of first aid. The mean attitude score for the study participants was 22.5 (SD: 2.7) out of 28 (80.4%), which reflects a positive attitude toward first aid. Binary logistic regression analysis identified that women, those who have a higher education level, medical students, those with a high monthly income (7500 Saudi Arabian rials (SAR) and above), and those who work in the healthcare sector were more likely to be knowledgeable about first aid (p<0.05). Participants aged 31 to 40 years and university students were more likely to have a positive attitude toward first aid (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This research highlights the need to educate the public about first aid and emergency treatment. Even though one-third of participants have received first aid training, ongoing training is necessary. First aid information, especially on social media, is often unreliable. Choking, difficulty breathing, and syncope are typical first aid conditions, and awareness of dealing with choking is needed. Gender, socioeconomic status, and education influenced first aid knowledge and attitudes. Women, medical students, and healthcare workers knew more about first aid. Most participants supported first aid provision. This research strongly suggests improving awareness, providing inexpensive first-aid training, and targeting specific populations to improve first-aid knowledge and attitudes.

Public Knowledge of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Lack of public understanding and perception may lead to a general downplaying of inflammatory bowel disorder (IBD) symptoms as they affect a less socially acceptable area of the body, which may be a significant component in the everyday struggles of an individual with IBD. AIM: The aim is to assess the public knowledge of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in Saudi Arabia. METHOD: This was an online survey study that examined public knowledge of IBD in Saudi Arabia for the duration between February and March 2023. Participants were invited to participate in this study using social media websites. The questionnaire tool comprised three sections: a sociodemographic characteristics section (seven questions), an awareness section (two questions), and a knowledge section (24 questions). A binary logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify the factors that influenced the participants' knowledge of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. RESULTS: A total of 630 individuals participated in this study. Around 28% of the participants reported that they had never heard of, read about, or dealt with Crohn's disease. Around 16% of them reported that they had never heard of, read about, or dealt with ulcerative colitis. The mean overall knowledge score of the study participants was 8.3 (standard deviation: 2.4) out of 24, which is equal to 34.6% and represents a weak level of knowledge of IBD. The participants showed a weak level of knowledge for all sub-scales of knowledge related to IBD general knowledge, diet, treatments, and complications. The knowledge sub-scale level ranged between 30% and 36.7%. Females, the participants in the moderate and high-income category, those who lived in urban areas, those with a higher level of education, and those who reported having osteoarthritis were more likely to be knowledgeable about IBD compared to others (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: In Saudi Arabia, a low level of IBD awareness was identified among the general population, supporting findings from other countries. Future research should aim to identify effective educational interventions to increase public awareness of this group of diseases, which would ultimately facilitate early diagnosis and improve patient outcomes.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: A tertiary center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a common procedure in children. The outcomes of PEG could be affected by the associated disease. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes and safety of PEG tube placement in a tertiary care center with special attention to patients with cardiac disease, ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt, or peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter. METHODS: This retrospective study included 113 pediatric patients who had PEG tube insertion from 2011 to 2021. Eighteen patients (15.93%) had cardiac disease, five patients (4.42%) had PD catheters, and three patients (2.65%) had VP shunt. RESULTS: The median age was 3 years (interquartile range: 1-6), and females represented 55% of our patients. The weight ranged from 2.57 to 60 kg, and the most common indication for insertion was neurological disease (n = 56; 49.56%). The median operative time was 30 (20-45) minutes. Pneumonia and vomiting were the most frequent complications (n = 20, 17.7%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in four patients (3.54%) and 1-year mortality in 10 patients (8.85%). Nine patients (7.96%) required fundoplication, and four patients (3.53%) had tube removal and reinsertion. There was no association between weight and postoperative complications (odds ratio: 0.97; P = .48). There were no differences in postoperative complications among patients with cardiac diseases, PD catheters, and VP shunts. No complications were reported in patients with VP shunt. One patient with cardiac disease and one patient with PD catheter required fundoplication. Removal and reinsertion were needed in one patient with a PD catheter. CONCLUSION: PEG is feasible in low-weight infants with a low complication rate. The complication rate is low in patients with VP shunt, PD catheter, and cardiac patients.

Sutureless versus interrupted sutures techniques for neonatal circumcision; a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: and objective: Male circumcision is a common procedure all over the world; in Saudi Arabia, circumcision is the most frequent elective surgical procedure performed on males. The use of sutures for neonatal circumcision may decrease bleeding; however, it may lead to skin sinus formation. The objective of this study was to compare the sutureless to the interrupted sutures technique for neonatal circumcision with Gamco clamp. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled clinical trial between 2017 and 2018. The study included 182 newborns assigned into two groups. Group 1 (n = 94) included neonates who had sutureless circumcision, and group 2 (n = 89) included neonates who underwent circumcision using interrupted absorbable 6/0 sutures. Study endpoints were bleeding, wound gaping, skin tunneling or sinus, and cyst formation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in patients' age and weight between groups. The procedure was significantly longer in group 2 (12.24 ± 2.17 vs. 6.54 ± 1.42 min; p < 0.001). There was no difference in bleeding between both groups (4 (4.26%) vs. 2 (2.27%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, p = 0.683). Cyst formation was significantly reduced in group 1 (2 (2.13%) vs. 13 (14.77%); p = 0.002) and skin sinus formation increased in group 2 (14 (15.91%) vs. 0 in group 2 and 1, respectively; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Circumcision can be performed with several techniques, and the superiority of one approach over the other is still debated. Many surgeons use interrupted sutures to oppose the skin edges, and in some reports, tissue glue was used for skin edges re-approximation with acceptable cosmetic results. In our study, the mean time taken for sutureless circumcision was about 7 min, and for the suture circumcision, it took around 11 min. In addition, the formation of a skin tunnel or sinuses rate was high despite the use of very thin sutures. CONCLUSION: Male circumcision is a common and safe technique with minor and treatable complications. Risks of bleeding and sinus track formation are low with the sutureless method. The sutureless technique is recommended after Gamco circumcision as the standard technique for male circumcision in the newborn.

Thoracoscopic repair of diaphragmatic eventration in children: a comparison of two repair techniques.

BACKGROUND: Thoracoscopic plication has gained popularity in the management of diaphragmatic eventration, and several suturing techniques have been described. However, the superiority of one technique over the other has not been demonstrated. The purpose of this study is to report our experience with diaphragmatic plication and to compare the thoracoscopic interrupted and pleated suture techniques in pediatric patients with diaphragmatic eventration. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study (level of evidence: 3) performed on 14 patients with diaphragmatic eventration. All patients were symptomatic and had diaphragmatic plication via thoracoscopy. The patients were further divided into two groups according to the repair technique; interrupted repair (n = 9) and pleated repair (n = 5). Preoperative, operative and postoperative data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The median age was 9.5 months (25th- 75th percentiles: 6 to 15 months), and 8 (57%) were males. Twelve patients (85.71%) had right side eventration, and nine patients (64.29%) had congenital diaphragmatic eventration. One case was converted to open thoracotomy because of adhesions. There was no difference in the preoperative characteristics between both groups. Median operative time was 117 min (25th- 75th percentiles: 101-129 min) and 77 min (25th- 75th percentiles: 73-83 min) in the interrupted and pleated groups, respectively (p = 0.004). One patient had a postoperative elevation of the diaphragm (incomplete repair) in the pleated group (p = 0.357). No recurrence was reported during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic plication is an effective technique for management of diaphragmatic eventration in children. Pleating technique is easy, fast, and associated with a marked reduction in operative time. TYPE OF THE STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level of evidence: 3.

Is It Safe for Trainees to Perform Single-Incision Pediatric Endosurgery Splenectomy?

INTRODUCTION: Few centers worldwide have advanced single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES) splenectomy. The safety and feasibility of SIPES performed by trainees were not assessed before. SIPES splenectomy is a demanding technique that needs high level of skills. This is the largest series of 39 SIPES splenectomies performed by 14 trainees in one single center. AIMS: To assess the safety, feasibility, and technical challenges of SIPES splenectomy performed by trainees and to compare it with other published series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of all patients operated with SIPES splenectomy for 7 years. SIPES port was inserted through 1.5 cm umbilical incision. One type of port and straight regular instruments were used in all cases. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients underwent SIPES splenectomy. Eighty percent was done by our trainees. Six cholecystectomies were done simultaneously. Forty-five patients with sickle cell disease, two with thalassemia, one spherocytosis, and one Fanconi's anemia. Mean operative time (MOT) for splenectomy was 182 minutes (130-190) and 251 minutes for splenectomy with cholecystectomy (230-270) depending on severity of adhesions and size of the spleen; P value <.001. Two conversions have to be opened due to bleeding. There is neither wound infection nor incisional hernia up to date. CONCLUSION: SIPES splenectomy is safe and feasible when performed by surgical trainees without adding any morbidity to the patient. Learning curve can quickly improve with more exposure of trainee to different SIPES procedures and hands-on workshops. More than one procedure could be done at the same time. It has excellent cosmesis and almost invisible scar.