Use of intravascular ultrasound as a "Quality Control" technique during carotid stent-angioplasty: are there risks to its use?

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides high-resolution vessel imaging and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes when used to assess the technical result of peripheral angioplasty procedures. Our vascular group compared anatomic and clinical outcomes of carotid artery stent-angioplasty (CAS) performed with angiogram monitoring alone, or in combination with IVUS imaging to select stent/balloon diameter and interrogate stent deployment region for residual stenosis. A retrospective review of our carotid stent registry (N=306) identified 220 CAS procedures performed with either a digital C-arm fluoroscopy alone (N=110) or in conjunction with IVUS (N=110) with at least 6-month of clinical follow-up. Outcome measures of procedure time, angioplasty balloon diameter, contrast dye volume, Duplex surveillance testing for recurrent stenosis, and procedure event (death, cardiac, neurologic) rates were compared to assess the risks and benefits of IVUS. All procedures utilized a cerebral protection device deployed prior to IVUS imaging. Procedure times were similar, but IVUS usage resulted in lower (P<0.05) contrast agent volumes due to fewer angiogram runs for stent sizing and verification of adequate stent deployment. IVUS imaging resulted in the use of larger diameter balloons (typically 6 mm) for final stent angioplasty based on distal internal carotid artery (ICA) dia measurements, and identified (P<0.01) more residual stent abnormalities (N=12, 11%) versus CAS with angiogram assessment alone (N=2, 1.8%). No procedural or 30-day cardiac events or deaths occurred. The overall stroke rate was 0.9%; two events (stroke-1; reperfusion injury-1) in the angio+IVUS group (1.8%) and none in the angio alone group. Duplex ultrasound surveillance following CAS demonstrated a higher (P<0.01) incidence of >50% diameter-reducing in-stent stenosis in the angio alone group (11% vs 7% at 1 month ; 24% vs 6% at last surveillance; mean 36 moontha; range: 6-66 months). The quality control of the CAS procedure was enhanced by IVUS imaging which directed stent /balloon sizing and was more accurate than angiography in confirming adequate stent expansion. No IVUS related adverse events occurred. Based on the anatomic information provided by IVUS, larger diameter angioplasty balloons were used which correlated with less residual stenosis after CAS based on duplex ultrasound testing.

Carotid intervention prior to or during coronary artery bypass grafting. When is it necessary?

Management of patients with advanced atherosclerosis involving the extra-cranial carotid and coronary arteries should be individualized based on symptoms and disease severity. A liberal policy to identify high-grade carotid stenosis using duplex ultrasound testing prior to coronary revascularization is recommended. Carotid intervention is efficacious for stroke reduction in patients with severe (>70% diameter reduction), bilateral internal carotid artery disease, especially if testing indicates abnormal cerebral perfusion via the circle of Willis. The morbidity of a combined carotid-coronary revascularization procedure should be less than 5%, but higher stroke and death rates can be expected in urgent cases with recent hemispheric symptoms. Patients with symptomatic >50% internal carotid artery stenosis should be considered for carotid endarterectomy at the time of coronary revascularization. Carotid angioplasty with cerebral protection is also an appropriate option in "high-risk" cardiac patients, especially in vascular centers with expertise and experience in performing this procedure. A policy of carotid endarterectomy prior to coronary bypass grafting is justified only in patients with stable coronary disease, good ejection fraction, and is best-performed using regional anesthesia.

Primary axillary-subclavian venous thrombosis: is aggressive surgical intervention justified?

Multimodal (thrombolysis, surgical decompression, venous reconstruction, oral anticoagulation) treatment of primary axillary-subclavian venous thrombosis was reviewed to assess the impact of venous patency on functional outcome. Since 1996, 7 patients (6 men, 1 woman) of ages 16-53 years (mean 33 years) presented with symptomatic acute axillosubclavian venous thrombosis as a result of a recent athletic or strenuous arm activity. Five patients had undergone previous (>2 weeks) catheter-directed thrombolysis and venous angioplasty. Diagnostic contrast venography followed by repeat catheter-directed thrombolysis demonstrated abnormal (residual stenosis [n=6] or occlusion [n=1]) axillosubclavian venous segments in all patients. Surgical intervention was performed at a mean interval of 7 days (range 1-19 days) after thrombolysis and consisted of thoracic outlet decompression with scalenectomy and 1st rib resection via a paraclavicular (n=4) or supraclavicular (n=3) approach. Medial claviculectomy or cervical rib resection was performed in 2 patients. Concomitant venous surgery was performed in all patients to restore normal venous patency by circumferential venolysis (n=7) and balloon catheter thrombectomy (n=3), or vein-patch angioplasty (n=2), or endovenectomy (n=5), or internal jugular transposition (n=2). Postoperative venous duplex testing beyond 1 month identified recurrent thrombosis in 4 patients despite therapeutic oral anticoagulation. Subsequent venous recanalization was documented in 3 patients. Poor functional outcome was associated with an occluded venous repair and extensive venous thrombosis on initial presentation. A patent or recanalized venous repair present in 6 of 7 patients was associated with good functional outcome and may justify multimodal intervention in patients with primary axillosubclavian effort thrombosis presenting with recurrent thrombosis and significant residual disease after thrombolysis.

Expanded application of in situ replacement for prosthetic graft infection.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of an individualized treatment algorithm for prosthetic graft infection, including the application of in situ graft replacement, based on clinical presentation, extent of graft infection, and microbiology. METHODS: There was a retrospective review (1991-2000) of 119 patients with 68 aortoiliofemoral or 51 extracavitary (infrainguinal, 19; axillofemoral, 16; femorofemoral, 16) prosthetic graft infections presenting more than 3 months (range, 3-136 months) after implantation/revision. The treatment algorithm consisted of graft excision with or without ex situ bypass grafts for patients presenting with sepsis or graft-enteric erosion, whereas in situ replacement (autogenous vein, rifampin-bonded polyester, polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE]) was used in patients with less virulent gram-positive graft infection, in particular infections caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Outcomes (death, limb loss, recurrent infection) were correlated with treatment type and infecting organism. RESULTS: In situ replacement was used in 52% of aortoiliofemoral (autogenous vein, 10; rifampin-bonded polyester, 6; PTFE, 9) and 80% of extracavitary (autogenous vein, 26; PTFE, 9; rifampin, 6) graft infections. Total graft excision with ex situ bypass was performed in 34 patients, including 21 patients with graft-enteric erosion/fistula, with a 21% operative mortality and 9% amputation rate. In situ graft replacement was used to treat 76 graft infections with a 30-day operative mortality rate of 4% and an amputation rate of 2%. Graft excision alone was performed in nine patients with one 30-day death. Gram-positive cocci were the prevalent infecting organisms of both intracavitary (59% of isolates) and extracavitary (76% of isolates) graft infections. S epidermidis was the infecting organism in 40% of patients, accounting for the expanded application of in situ prosthetic replacement using a rifampin-bonded polyester or PTFE prosthesis. During the mean follow-up interval of 26 months, recurrent graft infection developed in 3% (1 of 34) of patients after conventional treatment, 3% (1 of 36) patients after in situ vein replacement, and 10% (4 of 40) patients after in situ prosthetic graft replacement (P >.05). Failure of in situ replacement procedures was the result of virulent and antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. CONCLUSIONS: In situ replacement was a safe and durable option in most (64%) patients presenting with prosthetic graft infection. In situ replacement with a rifampin-bonded graft was effective for S epidermidis graft infection, but when the entire prosthesis is involved with either a biofilm or invasive perigraft infection, in situ autogenous vein replacement is preferred. Virulent graft infections presenting with sepsis, anastomotic dehiscence, or graft enteric fistula should continue to be treated with total graft excision, and if feasible, staged ex situ bypass graft.

Use of rifampin-soaked gelatin-sealed polyester grafts for in situ treatment of primary aortic and vascular prosthetic infections.

BACKGROUND: In situ treatment of artery/graft infection has distinct advantages compared to vessel excision and extra-anatomic bypass procedures. Based on animal studies of a rifampin-soaked, gelatin-impregnated polyester graft that demonstrated prolonged in vivo antibacterial activity, this antibiotic-bonded graft was used selectively in patients for in situ treatment of low-grade Gram-positive prosthetic graft infections or primary aortic infections not amenable to excision and ex situ bypass. METHODS: In a 5-year period (1995-1999), 27 patients with prosthetic graft infection (aortofemoral, n = 18, femorofemoral, n = 3; axillofemoral, n = 1) or primary aortic infection (mycotic aneurysm, n = 3; infected AAA, n = 2) underwent excision of the infected vessel and in situ replacement with a rifampin soaked (45-60 mg/ml for 15 min) gelatin-impregnated polyester graft. All prosthetic graft infections were low grade in nature, caused Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis, 16; Staphylococcus aureus, 5; Streptococcus, 1), and were treated electively. Patients with mycotic aortic aneurysm presented with sepsis and underwent urgent or emergent surgery. RESULTS: Two (8%) patients died-1 as a result of a ruptured Salmonella mycotic aortic aneurysm and the other from methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection following deep vein replacement of an in situ replaced femorofemoral graft. No amputations or late deaths as the result of vascular infection occurred in the 25 surviving patients. Two patients developed recurrent infection caused by a rifampin-resistant S. epidermidis in a replaced aortofemoral graft limb and were successfully treated with graft excision and in situ autogenous vein replacement. Eighteen patients remain alive and clinically free of infection after a mean follow-up interval of 17 months. CONCLUSIONS: In situ replacement treatment using a rifampin-bonded prosthetic graft for low-grade staphylococcal arterial infection was safe, durable, and associated with eradication of clinical signs of infection. Failure of this therapy was the result of virulent and antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains.

Utility of duplex surveillance following iliac artery angioplasty and primary stenting.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome and patency rates after iliac artery angioplasty and primary stenting using a noninvasive surveillance protocol that includes duplex ultrasonography. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients (64 men; mean age 61 +/- 9 years, range 45-83) underwent stenting of 84 iliac systems for claudication (63%), rest pain (9%), tissue loss (20%), or failing lower limb bypass graft (8%). The surveillance algorithm included aortoiliac duplex scanning within 1 month and serial limb pressure measurements and femoral artery waveform analyses during follow-up. Iliac systems with a peak systolic velocity >300 cm/s and velocity ratio >2.0 by duplex and/or symptomatic or hemodynamic deterioration were considered failing and an indication for angiography. RESULTS: During intermediate-term follow-up ranging to 36 months (mean 12), life table primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates for the treated iliac systems were 78%, 90%, and 98%, respectively, at 18 months. Assisted primary iliac system patency at 18 months was significantly worse in the 20 (24%) limbs having an outflow bypass done with or prior to iliac stenting (83% versus 100% without bypass, p = 0.01). Indirect clinical indicators found 17 (20%) suspected failing iliac systems, in which duplex imaging correctly identified 5 of 6 recurrent iliac stenoses and facilitated secondary endovascular intervention. Three (4%) stent occlusions occurred in the treated iliac systems despite surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex surveillance after iliac stenting localizes failing inflow segments, optimizes assisted patency of the treated iliac system, and possesses greatest utility in patients with multilevel occlusive disease and outflow reconstructions.

Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for categorizing the severity of carotid disease relative to duplex ultrasound scan and cerebral contrast arteriography (CA) to determine if MRA imaging could replace the need for cerebral angiography in cases of indeterminate or inadequate duplex scan imaging. METHODS: Seventy-four carotid bifurcations in 40 patients undergoing 45 carotid endarterectomies from 1996 to 1998 were imaged with duplex ultrasound scan; MRA (two-dimensional neck and three-dimensional intracranial, time-of-flight technique); and biplanar, digital subtraction cerebral arteriography. Studies were blindly reviewed by one reader who used established threshold velocity criteria for the duplex scan and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method for MRA and CA to determine the percentage of diameter reduction of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Disease severity was grouped into four categories (< 50%, 50%-74%, 75%-99% stenosis and occlusion), and the results of MRA and duplex ultrasound scan were compared with CA. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detection of > 50% ICA stenosis were 100%, 96%, 98%, and 100% for MRA and 100%, 72%, 88%, and 100% for duplex ultrasound scan, respectively; similarly, for detection of > 75% ICA stenosis values were 100%, 77%, 76%, and 100% for MRA and 90%, 74%, 72%, and 91% for duplex ultrasound scan, respectively. Both MRA and duplex ultrasound scan accurately differentiated all cases of > 95% stenosis (n = 7) from occlusion (n = 4). Short length ICA flow gaps were present on MRA in all cases of 75% to 99% stenosis and one half of cases of CA-defined 50% to 74% stenosis. In patients with 50% to 74% stenosis, the mean angiographic stenosis was significantly greater when a flow gap was present on MRA (64% +/- 6%) versus no flow gap (57% +/- 7%) (P =.04). There was overall agreement among duplex ultrasound scan, MRA, and CA in 73% of carotids imaged. Of the 24% discordant results between MRA and duplex ultrasound scan, MRA correctly predicted disease severity in all cases, and inaccurate duplex ultrasound scan results were due to overestimation in 83% of cases. The operative plan was altered by CA findings in only one patient (2%) after duplex ultrasound scan and MRA. CONCLUSIONS: MRA can accurately categorize the severity of carotid occlusive disease. Duplex ultrasound scan facilitates patient selection for carotid endarterectomy in most cases, but adjunct use of MRA improves diagnostic accuracy for > 75% stenoses and may obviate the need for cerebral arteriography when duplex scan results are inconclusive or demonstrate borderline disease severity.

Yield of repeated screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm after a 4-year interval. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the rate at which new abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) develop or whether screening older men for AAA, if undertaken, should be limited to once in a lifetime or repeated at intervals. METHODS: A large population of veterans, aged 50 through 79 years, completed a questionnaire and underwent ultrasound screening for AAA. Of these, 5151 without AAA on the initial ultrasound (defined as infrarenal aortic diameter of 3.0 cm or larger) were selected randomly to be invited for a second ultrasound screening after an interval of 4 years. Local records and national databases were searched to identify deaths and AAA diagnoses made during the study interval in subjects who did not attend the rescreening. RESULTS: Of the 5151 subjects selected for a second screening, 598 (11.6%) had died (none due to AAA), and 20 (0.4%) had an interim diagnosis of AAA. A second screening was performed on 2622 (50.9%), of whom 58 (2.2%; 95% confidence interval, 1.6%-2.8%) had new AAA. Three new AAAs were 4.0 to 4.9 cm, 10 were 3.5 to 3.9 cm, and 45 were 3.0 to 3.4 cm. Independent predictors of new AAA at the second screening included current smoker (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence, 1.74-5.50), coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.07), and, in a separate model using a composite variable, any atherosclerosis (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.35). Adding the interim and rescreening diagnosis rates suggests a 4-year incidence rate of 2.6%. Rescreening only in subjects with infrarenal aortic diameter of 2.5 cm or greater on the initial ultrasound would have missed more than two thirds of the new AAAs. CONCLUSIONS: A second screening is of little practical value after 4 years, mainly because the AAAs detected are small. However, the incidence that we observed suggests that a second screening after longer intervals (ie, more than 8 years) may provide yields similar to those seen in initial screening and therefore warrants further study.

The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in 73451 veterans aged 50 to 79 years who underwent ultrasound screening. OBJECTIVE: To understand the prevalence of and principal positive and negative risk factors for AAA, and to assess reproducibility of our previous findings. METHODS: In the new cohort of veterans undergoing screening, 52 745 subjects aged 50 to 79 without history of AAA underwent successful ultrasound screening for AAA, after completing a questionnaire on demographics and potential risk factors. RESULTS: We detected AAA of 4.0 cm or larger in 613 participants (1.2%; compared with 1.4% in the earlier cohort). The direction and magnitude of the important associations reported in the first cohort were confirmed. Respective odds ratios for the major associations with AAA for the second and for the combined cohorts were as follows: 1.81 and 1.71 for age (per 7 years), 0.12 and 0. 18 for female sex, 0.59 and 0.53 for black race, 1.94 and 1.94 for family history of AAA, 4.45 and 5.07 for smoking, 0.50 and 0.52 for diabetes, and 1.60 and 1.66 for atherosclerotic diseases. The excess prevalence associated with smoking accounted for 75% of all AAAs of 4.0 cm or larger in the total population of 126 196. Associations for AAA of 3.0 to 3.9 cm were similar but tended to be somewhat weaker. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm our previous cohort findings. Age, smoking, family history of AAA, and atherosclerotic diseases remained the principal positive associations with AAA, and female sex, diabetes, and black race remained the principal negative associations.

Does prosthetic covering of nitinol stents alter healing characteristics or hemodynamics?

PURPOSE: To evaluate placement of polyester (Dacron) coverings on nitinol stents implanted in the canine aorta to determine the effect on cross-sectional lumen area, development of intimal hyperplasia, device endothelialization, and flow hemodynamics. METHODS: Ten polyester-covered and 10 uncovered nitinol stents (60-mm length, 10- or 12-mm diameter) were deployed percutaneously in the normal infrarenal aorta of 20 adult mongrel dogs using random assignment. Angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and duplex ultrasound performed at device deployment and before explantation at 6 weeks were used to measure aorta/device diameter and cross-sectional area. Pressure-perfusion-fixed aortic segments were compared for surface endothelialization (CD31 staining) and for thickness of neointimal formation. RESULTS: All 20 endoluminal devices were accurately positioned in the infrarenal aorta without early or delayed evidence of device thrombosis, significant lumen narrowing, or device deformity. IVUS and duplex scanning identified no anatomical stenosis in either the covered or the bare devices by duplex ultrasound; peak systolic velocity measurements were similar (106+/-25 cm/s in the covered stent versus 96+/-25 cm/s for bare stents, p > 0.05). Mean neointimal thickness was significantly greater (p < 0.005) in the covered (326+/-145 microm) compared with the bare (219+/-62 microm) stents. Intima-to-media height ratios were greater in the covered stents (3.0+/-1.1 compared with 1.1+/-0.2, p < 0.003). Mean surface area endothelialization in the proximal, middle, and distal sections of each device was similar (p > 0.05) in covered (59%, 56%, and 69%) and bare (59%, 65%, and 53%) stents. CONCLUSIONS: Deployment and balloon dilation of a covered nitinol stent in a nondiseased canine aorta increased neointimal development compared with an uncovered stent, but overall lumen cross-sectional area was preserved. No differences in device patency, intradevice thrombus formation, flow hemodynamics, or luminal endothelialization were demonstrated, despite a thicker intradevice neointima induced by the polyester covering.

Intraoperative duplex monitoring of infrainguinal vein bypass procedures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate intraoperative duplex scanning of infrainguinal vein bypass grafts to detect technical and hemodynamic problems, monitor their repair, and correlate findings with the incidence of thrombosis and stenosis repair rates within 90 days of operation. METHODS: Color duplex scanning was used at operation to assess vein/anastomotic patency and velocity spectra waveforms of 626 infrainguinal vein bypass grafts (in situ saphenous, 228 grafts; nonreversed translocated saphenous, 170 grafts; reversed saphenous, 147 grafts; alternative [arm, lesser saphenous], 81 grafts) to the popliteal (n = 267 grafts), infrageniculate (n = 323 grafts), or pedal artery (n = 36 grafts). The entire bypass graft was scanned after intragraft injection of papaverine hydrochloride (30-60 mg) to augment graft flow. Vein/anastomotic/artery segments with velocity spectra that indicate highly disturbed flow (peak systolic velocity, >180 cm/sec; spectral broadening; velocity ratio at site, >3) were revised. Grafts with a low peak systolic velocity less than 30 to 40 cm/s and high outflow resistance (absent diastolic flow) underwent procedures (distal arteriovenous fistula, sequential bypass grafting) to augment flow; if this was not possible, the grafts were treated with an antithrombotic regimen, including heparin, dextran, and antiplatelet therapy. RESULTS: Duplex scanning prompted revision of 104 lesions in 96 (15%) bypass grafts, including 82 vein/anastomotic stenoses, 17 vein segments with platelet thrombus, and 5 low-flow grafts. Revision rate was highest (P <.01) for alternative vein bypass grafts (27%) compared with the other grafting methods (reversed vein bypass grafts, 10%; nonreversed translocated, 13%; in situ, 16%). A normal intraoperative scan on initial imaging (n = 464 scans) or after revision (n = 67 scans) was associated with a 30-day thrombosis rate of 0.2% and a revision rate of 0.8% for duplex-detected stenosis (peak systolic velocity, >300 cm/s; velocity ratio, >3.5). By comparison, 20 of 95 bypass grafts (21%) with a residual (n = 29 grafts) or unrepaired duplex stenosis (n = 53 grafts) or low flow (n = 13 grafts) had a corrective procedure for graft thrombosis (n = eight grafts) or stenosis (n = 12 grafts; P <.001). Overall, 8% of patients with bypass grafts underwent a corrective procedure within 90 days of operation. Secondary graft patency was 99.4% at 30 days and 98.8% at 90 days (eight graft failures). CONCLUSION: The observed 15% intraoperative revision rate coupled with a low 90-day failure/revision rate (2.5%) for bypasses with normal papaverine-augmented duplex scans supports the routine use of this diagnostic modality to enhance the precision and early results of infrainguinal vein bypass procedures.

A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the appropriate timing and frequency of duplex ultrasound scanning after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the detection of high-grade stenosis caused by recurrent carotid stenosis or contralateral atherosclerotic disease progression. METHODS: In 221 patients who underwent 242 CEAs, duplex scanning was performed before, during, and after operation (in 3-month to 6-month intervals). High-grade internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (peak systolic velocity, >300 cm/s; diastolic velocity, >125 cm/s; ICA/common carotid artery ratio, >4) prompted the recommendation for repair. An average of four postoperative scanning procedures was performed during a mean follow-up period of 27.4 months. RESULTS: Intraoperative duplex scan results prompted the immediate revision of 12 repairs (4.9%), and one perioperative stroke (<1%) occurred. Six CEAs (2.7%) had asymptomatic recurrent stenosis (>50% diameter-reduction [DR]; systolic velocity, >125 cm/s) develop. Only one of six patients had >75% DR stenosis develop and underwent reoperation (<1% yield for CEA surveillance). The yield of surveillance of the unoperated ICA was higher (P =.003), and 12% of unoperated sides had progressive stenosis (n = 21) or occlusion (n = 3) develop, which led to seven CEAs for high-grade stenosis. Disease progression to >75% DR stenosis was five times as frequent (P =.002) in patients with >50% DR stenosis initially. All patients but one who required contralateral endarterectomy for disease progression had >50% ICA stenosis when first seen. During the follow-up period, no disabling strokes ipsilateral to an operated carotid artery occurred, but three strokes occurred in the hemisphere of the contralateral unoperated ICA. CONCLUSION: The yield of duplex scan surveillance after CEA was low. Only 13 patients (5.9%) had severe disease develop to warrant additional intervention. Progression of contralateral disease rather than restenosis was the most common abnormality that was identified. Duplex scanning at 1-year to 2-year intervals after CEA is adequate when a technically precise repair is achieved and minimal contralateral disease (<50% DR) is present. A policy of duplex scan surveillance and reoperation for high-grade stenosis was associated with a 1.6% incidence rate of disabling stroke during the follow-up period.

Duplex features of vein graft stenosis and the success of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

PURPOSE: To determine if criteria exist that are correlated to a successful outcome after balloon angioplasty for vein graft stenosis. METHODS: During a 5-year period, duplex surveillance of 380 infrainguinal vein bypasses identified 76 hemodynamically failing grafts (87 stenoses) requiring intervention. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was selected over surgical repair based on 3 criteria: time interval from primary grafting procedure, vein graft diameter, and stenosis length. The 28 (32%) stenoses (20 grafts) treated by PTA were used in a retrospective analysis to test if any variables favored a successful outcome. Patient and lesion characteristics, graft patency, and restenosis following PTA were correlated with duplex features of the stenosis recorded prior to, immediately after, and at 3- to 6-month intervals postprocedurally. RESULTS: Lesion characteristics that correlated with a successful outcome were vein size > or = 3.5 mm, lesion length < 2 cm, and appearance > 3 months after surgery. Conduit type, PTA site, patient demographics, and indication for bypass did not correlate with PTA durability. Nineteen lesions in 13 grafts met these criteria (group 1), while 9 stenoses in 7 grafts did not (group 2). Lesion severity based on duplex velocity measurements were similar in both groups before (p = 0.40) and after (p = 0.32) treatment. During the mean 21-month follow-up, group 1 grafts required less intervention (p = 0.035). At last follow-up, hemodynamic changes were durable in group 1 (p = 0.0068) but not in group 2 (p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Selection of vein graft stenoses for treatment by PTA can be based on temporal and duplex data. PTA of short (< 2 cm) stenoses in good caliber veins (> or = 3.5 mm) appearing > 3 months after bypass placement was durable with a late intervention rate of approximately 10%. Direct surgical repair or replacement is recommended for early (< 3 months) and/or long segment stenoses that develop in small caliber conduits.

Surgical and endovascular intervention for infrainguinal vein graft stenosis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stenosis-free patency of open repair (vein-patch angioplasty, interposition, jump grafting) and percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) of 144 vein graft stenoses that were detected during duplex scan surveillance after infrainguinal vein bypass grafting. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision of an infrainguinal vein bypass graft were analyzed for type of vein conduit, vascular laboratory findings leading to revision, repair techniques, assisted graft patency rate, procedure mortality rate, and restenosis of the repair site. RESULTS: The time of postoperative revision ranged from 1 day to 133 months (mean, 13 months). One hundred eighteen primary and 26 recurrent stenoses (peak systolic velocity, >300 cm/s) in 52 tibial and 35 popliteal vein bypass grafts were identified by means of duplex scanning. The repairs consisted of 77 open procedures (vein-patch angioplasty, 28; vein interposition, 33; jump graft, 9; primary repair, 3) and 67 PTAs. No patient died as a result of intervention. Cumulative assisted graft patency rate (life-table analysis) was 91% at 1 year and 80% at 3 years. At 2 years, cumulative assisted graft patency rate was comparable for saphenous vein grafts (reversed, 94%; in situ, 88%; nonreversed, 63%) and alternative vein grafts (89%). Stenosis-free patency rate at 2 years was identical (P =.55) for surgical intervention (63%) and endovascular intervention (63%) but varied with type of surgical revision (P =.04) and time of intervention (<4 months, 45%; >4 months, 71%; P =.006). The use of duplex scan-monitored PTA to treat focal stenoses (<2 cm) and late-appearing stenoses (>3 months) was associated with a stenosis-free patency rate that was 89% at 1 year. After intervention, the alternative vein bypass grafts necessitated twice the reinterventions per month of graft survival (P =.01). Bypass graft to the popliteal versus infrageniculate arteries, site of graft stenosis (vein conduit, anastomotic region), and repair of a primary versus a recurrent stenosis did not influence the outcome after intervention. CONCLUSION: The revision of duplex scan-detected vein graft stenosis with surgical or endovascular techniques was associated with an excellent patency rate, including when intervention on alternative vein conduits or treatment of restenosis was necessary. When PTA was selected on the basis of clinical and duplex scan selection criteria, the endovascular treatment of focal vein graft stenosis was effective, durable, and comparable with the surgical revision of more extensive lesions.

Duplex imaging of lower extremity bypasses, angioplasties, and stents.

Duplex scan surveillance after lower extremity bypass and endovascular interventions can have a favorable impact on outcome. Its application during an arterial intervention to exclude technical or hemodynamic abnormalities and as part of a postoperative surveillance program to detect stenosis has been shown to improve patency. Results of duplex imaging can identify the arterial reconstruction at high risk of failure/thrombosis, which requires more intensive surveillance. Based on stenosis severity and anatomy, duplex scanning can suggest which repair technique (open surgery vs percutaneous balloon angioplasty [PTA]) is more appropriate. The use of duplex imaging during PTA of graft or peripheral artery stenoses (duplex-monitored balloon angioplasty) is recommended to verify normalization of velocity spectra, because this end point is associated with improved stenosis-free patency. A duplex surveillance program combined with correction of progressively stenotic lesions is recommended after lower limb bypass and PTA.

Relationship of age, gender, race, and body size to infrarenal aortic diameter. The Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of age, gender, race, and body size on infrarenal aortic diameter (IAD) and to determine expected values for IAD on the basis of these factors. METHODS: Veterans aged 50 to 79 years at 15 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers were invited to undergo ultrasound measurement of IAD and complete a pre-screening questionnaire. We report here on 69,905 subjects who had no previous history of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and no ultrasound evidence of AAA (defined as IAD > or = 3.0 cm). RESULTS: Although age, gender, black race, height, weight, body mass index, and body surface area were associated with IAD by multivariate linear regression (all p < 0.001), the effects were small. Female sex was associated with a 0.14 cm reduction in IAD and black race with a 0.01 cm increase in IAD. A 0.1 cm change in IAD was associated with large changes in the independent variables: 29 years in age, 19 cm or 40 cm in height, 35 kg in weight, 11 kg/m2 in body mass index, and 0.35 m2 in body surface area. Nearly all height-weight groups were within 0.1 cm of the gender means, and the unadjusted gender means differed by only 0.23 cm. The variation among medical centers had more influence on IAD than did the combination of age, gender, race, and body size. CONCLUSIONS: Age, gender, race, and body size have statistically significant but small effects on IAD. Use of these parameters to define AAA may not offer sufficient advantage over simpler definitions (such as an IAD > or = 3.0 cm) to be warranted.

Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Independent risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have not been clearly defined in multivariable analyses of large patient populations. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that are independently associated with AAA and to determine the prevalence of previously unrecognized AAA in defined demographic and risk groups. DESIGN: Cross-sectional screening study. SETTING: 15 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: 73451 veterans who were 50 to 79 years of age and had no history of AAA. MEASUREMENTS: The results of ultrasonographic screening for AAA and a prescreening questionnaire were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: An AAA of 4.0 cm or larger was detected in 1031 participants (1.4%). Smoking was the risk factor most strongly associated with AAA; the odds ratio (OR) for AAAs of 4.0 cm or larger compared with normal aortas (infrarenal aortic diameter < 3.0 cm) was 5.57 (95% CI, 4.24 to 7.31). The association between smoking and AAA increased significantly with the number of years of smoking and decreased significantly with the number of years after quitting smoking. The excess prevalence associated with smoking accounted for 78% of all AAAs that were 4.0 cm or larger in the study sample. Female sex (OR, 0.22 [CI, 0.07 to 0.68]), black race (OR, 0.49 [CI, 0.35 to 0.69]), and presence of diabetes (OR, 0.54 [CI, 0.44 to 0.65]) were negatively associated with AAA. A family history of AAA was positively associated with AAA (OR, 1.95 [CI, 1.56 to 2.43]) but was reported by only 5.1% of participants. Other independently associated factors included age, height, coronary artery disease, any atherosclerosis, high cholesterol levels, and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with multiple factors. Smoking was the risk factor most strongly associated with AAA and may be responsible for most clinically important cases of previously undiagnosed AAA.

Natural history of infrainguinal vein graft stenosis relative to bypass grafting technique.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the incidence of vein graft stenosis is related to bypass grafting technique and thus modification of postoperative surveillance protocols may be required. METHODS: From 1991 to 1996, 338 infrainguinal vein bypasses constructed using in situ (n = 131), reversed (n = 120), nonreversed translocated (n = 48), or spliced/upper extremity vein (n = 39) grafting techniques were evaluated by intraoperative duplex scanning to optimize bypass construction and serially thereafter to detect developing vein graft stenoses. Bypass procedures were performed in 322 patients for critical limb ischemia (83%), claudication (13%), or popliteal aneurysm (4%). Using life-table analysis, graft patency and revision/failure rates were compared relative to grafting technique, need for operative revision, and intraoperative duplex scan results. RESULTS: Three-year primary and secondary graft patency rates were higher (p < 0.001) for in situ bypass grafts (85%/97%) compared with reversed (57%/83%), nonreversed translocated (62%/78%), or alternative (51%/76%) vein bypass grafts. During a mean follow-up interval of 19 months, the incidence of graft revision was higher for reversed saphenous (23%) and alternative (28%) vein bypass grafts compared with in situ (10%) or nonreversed (16%) saphenous vein bypass grafts. Despite a normal intraoperative graft duplex scan, the revision/failure rate of reversed vein grafts was 2.5 times greater than in situ/nonreversed translocated vein conduits (primary patency rate at 3 years, 60% vs 87%, p = 0.009). Bypass grafts modified at operation on the basis of duplex scanning were two times more likely to require postoperative revision than grafts with normal intraoperative scans. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative graft stenosis and need for revision varies with bypass grafting technique. Reversed vein bypasses and grafts modified at operation may be more prone than in situ vein bypass grafts to develop stenosis and thus require intensive surveillance. Infrainguinal vein graft failure and the need for revision may be reduced by the adoption of bypass grafting techniques that include valve lysis and intraoperative duplex scan assessment.