Analysis of HLA-G 14 bp Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism and HLA-G, ILT2 and ILT4 Expression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.

HLA-G is the checkpoint molecule involved in the suppression of the immune response. Increased expression of HLA-G and its ILTs receptors have been correlated with tumor progression in various cancer types. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tumors, the effect of HLA-G, ILT2 and ILT4 expression on cancer development has to be explained. The 34 HNSCC patients and 98 controls were genotyped for the HLA-G 14 bp ins/del polymorphism. In HNSCC lesions, HLA-G, ILT2 and ILT4 mRNA expression was analysed using real-time PCR. The association between HLA-G, ILT2 and ILT4 mRNA expression and clinical variables (age at onset, TNM staging system and p16 positivity) was also evaluated. No genetic association between the HLA-G 14 bp ins/del and HNSCC risk was detected (p > 0.05). However, in the non-metastatic HNSCC group, a significantly higher HLA-G mRNA expression was noted in tumors in the T4 stage compared to those in the T1 and T2 stages (p = 0.0289). ILT2 mRNA expression was significantly increased in non-metastatic vs. metastatic tumors (p = 0.0269). Furthermore, a significantly higher ILT4 mRNA expression was noted in tumors in the T1+T2 stage compared to those in the T3 stage (p = 0.0495). Our results suggest that the HLA-G molecule creates an immunological microenvironment involved in HNSCC development.

Association of HLA-G Polymorphisms in the 3'UTR Region and Soluble HLA-G with Kidney Graft Outcome.

Background: Human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) belongs to nonclassical HLA I molecule involving in the suppression of immune response. Besides its profound effect to induce fetal tolerance, HLA-G expression has been associated with allograft acceptance. For the regulation of HLA-G levels, polymorphic sites within the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) are of crucial importance. The aim of the study was to analyze the association between several HLA-G 3'UTR variants (+3003T/C, +3010C/G, +3027C/A, +3035C/T, +3142G/C, +3187A/G, and +3196C/G), soluble HLA-G (sHLA-G) level, and kidney graft outcome in the Slovak Caucasian population. Methods: We investigated 69 kidney transplant recipients (45 males, 24 females) of age 27-65 years. Out of this group, 37 recipients developed acute rejection that was biopsy proven. Recipient's plasma was obtained at 1 day before transplantation and analyzed by ELISA. The HLA-G 3'UTR polymorphisms were typed by direct sequencing. Results: In the recipients with stable allograft function, significantly higher values of sHLA-G were found in the homozygous +3010GG, +3142CC, +3187GG, and +3196CC carriers in comparison to the acute rejection recipients (P = 0.01-0.05). Conclusion: The study demonstrated genetic association between HLA-G 3'UTR variants and sHLA-G level in kidney recipients leading to graft acceptance. We suggest to monitor the pretransplantation sHLA-G level as additional marker to predict kidney graft outcome. Abbreviations: AMR: Antibody-mediated rejection; APC: antigen-presenting cell; CD: cluster of designation; del: deletion; HLA: human leukocyte antigen; ILT: immunoglobulin-like transcript; ins: insertion; KIR: killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor; NK: natural killer; sHLA-G: soluble HLA-G; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; TCMR: T cell-mediated rejection; URR: upstream regulatory region; UTR: untranslated region.

Expression of HLA-G transcripts in graft biopsy samples of renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The HLA-G molecule has a high potential to modulate immune response towards the improvement of graft survival after transplantation. In this work, we have analyzed the total HLA-G mRNA expression in graft tissues of dysfunctional transplanted kidneys. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined 84 kidney biopsy samples obtained from 65 renal transplant recipients with dysfunctional graft (50 males, 15 females; average age 46.8 ± 11.9 years). 52 specimens were with signs of acute rejection and 32 without any rejection characteristics (diagnosed as glomerulonephritis, ATN and IFTA). Patients with acute rejection were divided into three groups: antibody-mediated rejection (AMR; n = 23), T cell mediated rejection (TCMR; n = 16) and combined antibody and T cell-mediated rejection (AMR + TCMR; n=13). The biopsy samples were taken from a dysfunctional graft at different time periods after kidney transplantation. The relative expression of total HLA-G mRNA in biopsy specimens was determined by real time RT-PCR. The correlation between HLA-G mRNA expression and dysfunctional graft state was investigated. The impact of different factors (post-transplantation interval, gender,mismatch, induction therapy and cold ischemia time) on relative expression of total HLA-G mRNA was also studied. RESULTS: We have found that the levels of HLA-G transcripts in kidneys with rejection were higher than those in non-rejected but dysfunctional grafts (P = 0.0003). The highest levels of HLA-G mRNA were detected at combined AMR + TCMR rejection (P= 0.005). The time-course analysis of total HLA-G mRNA expression was also studied. In both dysfunctional graft groups (rejected and non-rejected) the lower levels of HLA-G transcripts were detected during early post-transplant period (1­3 months), however a substantial increase of HLA-G mRNA expression was observed after an extended period of time(N3 months). It was also revealed that antibody induction therapy may reduce HLA-G expression (P=0.0004) and in female samples were higher levels of HLAG transcripts than those in male recipients (P=0.003). It was found no significant impact of age, cold ischemic time, PRA (Panel Reactive Antibody) score, and a number of HLA-mismatches on HLA-G mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that the expression of total HLA-GmRNA in renal grafts can be influenced by different factors such as clinical state of transplanted kidney, elapsed time after transplantation, gender and antibody induction therapy. We have proved that HLA-G mRNA expression was significantly higher in recipients with acute rejection in comparison to patients with dysfunctional but non-rejected grafts.