Socio-cultural and financial issues against breast cancer screening behaviour among eligible Indian women: evidence for action.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer, a common malignancy in Indian women, is preventable and curable upon early diagnosis. Screening is the best control strategy against breast cancer, but its uptake is low in India despite dedicated strategies and programmes. We explored the impact of socio-cultural and financial issues on the uptake of breast cancer screening behaviour among Indian women. METHODS: Breast cancer screening-uptake and relevant social, cultural, and financial data obtained from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) round 5 were used for analysis. We studied 399,039 eligible females to assess their breast cancer screening behavior and determine the impact of socio-cultural and financial issues on such behavior using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Most participants were 30-34-year-old (27.8%), educated to the secondary level (38.0%), and 81.5% had bank accounts. A third (35.0%) had health insurance, and anaemia was the most common comorbidity (56.1%). Less than 1.0% had undergone breast cancer screening. Higher age, education, urban residence, employment, less privileged social class, and access to the Internet and mass media were predictors of positive screening-uptake behavior (p < 0.05). Mothers of larger number of children, tobacco- and alcohol-users, the richer and having health insurance had negative uptake behavior (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A clear impact of socio-cultural and financial factors on breast cancer screening behavior is evident among Indian women. Therefore, apart from the ongoing health system strengthening efforts, our findings call for targeted interventions against prevailing misconceptions and taboos along with economic and social empowerment of women for the holistic success of India's cancer screening strategy.

Face mask use and disposal behaviour of frontline young doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-year study.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected India in spite of an ongoing vaccination campaign. The doctors are at greater risk of COVID-19 and face masks are a protective measure against this threat. We assessed the use and disposal of face masks among postgraduate trainees (PGTs) working on the COVID-19 frontline in an Indian medical college. METHODOLOGY: Data was collected from all PGTs who agreed to participate during the first, second and third wave of the pandemic in India. A pre-tested questionnaire to assess and compare face mask use and disposal behaviour across the three phases was used. RESULTS: All participants used face masks regularly; a significant uptrend in N-95 mask users and double mask users was observed as the pandemic progressed. Use of face shields peaked during the second wave. Most participants preferred keeping the mask on always at work and avoided donning and doffing of masks in between usage. Many of them practiced 'extended use' of face masks and nearly a third re-used a mask for ≥ 6 days, which is against the standard recommendations; however, such behavior among participants showed a downward trend. Proper disposal practices were not followed by many participants, leaving scope for environmental contamination. CONCLUSIONS: There is an imminent need to make the young frontline doctors aware regarding appropriate mask usage and disposal for better preparedness before any health exigencies of the future.

Factors predicting proper handwashing practice amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in India: a field-based cross-sectional study.

Proper handwashing is one of the effective ways to prevent many communicable diseases, including COVID-19. We explored the handwashing practices in a rural Indian population before the probable third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A data collection schedule was administered to eligible adult members of a rural community, selected by multi-stage sampling, to assess their pattern and practice of handwashing. All 176 respondents washed their hands after defecation, 82.4 and 80.7% washed hands after urination and before taking food, respectively, while 68.2% of respondents washed hands after coming back from outdoors. Among those who handwashed, 82.9% used soap water after defecation; 46.2, 45.8 and 50.8% washed hands with soap water after urination, before taking food and after visiting outdoors, respectively. Only a quarter (24.4%) of all the participants used soap water for handwashing consistently after defecation, after urination, before taking food and after coming home. The more educated, those coming from higher socioeconomic stratum and working from home, were more likely to report proper handwashing practice. Handwashing, as recommended by health agencies, for restraining COVID-19 infection, was not noticed in the majority of the participants. Better awareness of handwashing is recommended to help restrain COVID-19 in the Indian population.

Public Perception About Pandemic Situation and Preparedness Towards a Probable Lockdown in an Affected Indian State Amidst the Second Wave of the Covid-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 second wave badly affected India. This study assessed public preparedness and attitude towards a new lockdown in the state of West Bengal (WB) along with perception about the COVID pandemic situation. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was administered to all willing adult attendees of a COVID vaccination centre in Kolkata, capital city of WB. Logistic regression was applied to find the relationship between attitude towards lockdown and other selected independent variables. RESULTS: Of the 839 persons analyzed, 72.0% were non-health workers; and 55.4% thought that available vaccines reduce COVID-19 risk. Among them, 54.4% wanted stricter guidelines imposed. For preparedness, 42.6% and 28.8% said they would stock additional food and medicines respectively. On multiple logistic regression, being female, having elderly family members, perceiving the second wave as worse, and favouring stricter restrictions, all had odds of favourable attitude towards the new, proposed lockdown. CONCLUSIONS: A new lockdown was favoured by the majority. However, a well-planned and phased approach for this is needed in the light of many concerns about the previous lockdown. Mental health issues, financial security, medical help at hand, and ease of travel to workplaces are important issues that need to be addressed in case of future lockdown(s).