The effect of scalp block or local wound infiltration versus systemic analgesia on post-craniotomy pain relief.

BACKGROUND: This is a prospective, double-blind observational study in which different types of analgesia and its effect on postoperative pain reduction in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor removal were compared. METHODS: The study included 141 adult craniotomy patients that were randomly separated into three equal groups. A group with scalp nerve blockade (B) and wound infiltration (I) received 0.25% bupivacaine combined with 1% lidocaine and 1:200,000 epinephrine. One gram of paracetamol and 2 mg/kg ketoprofen were administered intravenously (IV) after skin closure in a group with systemic analgesia (S). Pain intensity was evaluated after 1, 3, 6, and 24 h postoperatively using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The amount of rescue analgesia (ketorolac, paracetamol, and pethidine) and the duration for its first requirement were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients were included in the study. The main pain scores were significantly lower in the groups with regional anesthesia compared to group S in the first hours post-surgery (p < 0.05). Significantly lower pain scores were observed in the group with a scalp nerve blockade compared to the group with systemic analgesia or wound infiltration after 24 h (p < 0.05). Regional anesthesia ensured a stable analgesic effect for all 24 h. Patients in groups B and I required significantly fewer rescue analgesics compared to patients in group S. The duration for the requirement of the first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in groups B and I compared to group S (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that most patients experience pain in the early postsurgical hours. Regional analgesia could help reduce the incidence and severity of pain after a craniotomy and the amount of rescue analgesia used in this group of patients.

The effects of sevoflurane and propofol on cerebral hemodynamics during intracranial tumors surgery under monitoring the depth of anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: Hemodynamic effects during cerebral tumor resection surgery under monitoring the depth of anesthesia and during recovery in sevoflurane- or propofol-anesthetized patients have not been previously compared. OBJECTIVE: To compare cerebral hemodynamic changes using transcranial Doppler sonography during sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia under state entropy (SE) monitoring, and during recovery period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a randomized manner, 130 patients received sevoflurane (group T-S) or propofol (group T-P) to maintain SE at 40-50. Cerebral blood flow velocity (Vmean) in the middle cerebral artery was evaluated at baseline, after tracheal intubation, opening of the dura mater, tumor resection, skin closure, extubation, and two hours after extubation. Cerebrovascular resistance index (RAP), estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (eCPP), and cerebral blood flow index (CBFI) were calculated off-line. RESULTS: During surgery SE was 40.6 (SD, 8.1) in the group T-S and 44.0 (SD, 7.4) in the group T-P. Blood pressure was significantly higher in the group T-P. Compared to the baseline, Vmean decreased by 16.6% and 23.5% in the groups T-S and T-P, respectively (P<0.05). RAP and eCPP were higher in the group T-P versus the group T-S: 28.9% and 5.2%, respectively, above the baseline for RAP (P<0.005) and 3.2% and 16.9% below the baseline for eCPP (P<0.005). CBFI was below the baseline by 20.1% and 24.0% in the groups T-S and T-P, respectively (P>0.05). After the extubation and 2 hours later, Vmean recovered comparably with no differences in RAP, eCPP, or CBFI between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: At the comparable depth of anesthesia for intracranial tumors surgery and during recovery, sevoflurane had no major effect on cerebral circulation measured by transcranial Doppler sonography as compared with propofol. Our results add to current knowledge on the safety of sevoflurane in neuroanesthesia.