Asian venous thromboembolism guidelines: updated recommendations for the prevention of venous thromboembolism.

The Asian venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines were first published in 2012. Since its first edition, the Asian Venous Thrombosis Forum (AVTF) working group have updated the Asian VTE epidemiology and reviewed issues that were not addressed in the previous guidelines. The authors noted that the rising incidence of VTE across Asia may be attributable to aging population, dietary changes, and increasing incidence of obesity and diabetes. The new additions in the guideline include role of thrombophilia in VTE, bleeding risk in Asians, individual risk assessment, updates in the prevention of VTE in medically ill, bariatric surgery, cancer, orthopedic and trauma patients. The influence of primary thrombophilia in perioperative VTE is still unclear. The secondary risk factors, however, are similar between Asians and Caucasians. The group found no evidence of increased risk of bleeding while using pharmacological agents, including the use of novel anti-coagulants. At present, Caprini risk assessment model is widely used for individual risk assessment. Further validation of this model is needed in Asia. In medically ill patients, pharmacological agents are preferred if there is no bleeding risk. Intermittent pneumatic compression device (IPC) is recommended in patients with bleeding risk but we do not recommend using graduated compressive stockings. In bariatric patients, data on VTE is lacking in Asia. We recommend following current international guidelines. A high index of suspicion should be maintained during postbariatric surgery to detect and promptly treat portomesenteric venous thrombosis. Different cancer types have different thrombotic risks and the types of surgery influence to a large extent the overall VTE risk. Cancer patients should receive further risk assessment. In patients with higher thrombotic risk, either due to predisposing risk or concomitant surgery, low molecular weight heparin is indicated. Different countries appear to have different incidence of VTE following trauma and major orthopedic surgery. We recommend mechanical prophylaxis using IPC as the main method and additional pharmacological prophylaxis if the thrombotic risk is high. As for obstetric practice, we propose adherence to the UK Greentop guideline that is widely accepted and utilized across Asia. To improve VTE thromboprophylaxis implementation in the region, we propose that there should be better health education, establishment of hospital-based guidelines and multidisciplinary collaboration.

Clinical features and treatment outcomes of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma.

The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate clinical features and treatment outcomes in patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), data of which were collected over a 15-year period. Sixty-five patients diagnosed with AITL were included in the study. About half of the patients (46.2%) presented with poor performance status (ECOG > or = 2); 72.3% of patients belonged to high intermediate or high-risk of IPI and same proportion belonged to Class 2 of PIT (Prognostic index for PTCL-U), and most patients (95.4%) were diagnosed at an advanced stage. At diagnosis, 27 patients (41.5%) presented with malignant pleural effusion, and 22 patients (33.8%) had skin involvement. Most of the initial chemotherapy regimens were anthracycline-based (88.2%). Overall response rate to initial chemotherapy was 86.2% (64.7% of complete response, 21.5% of partial response). The median progression-free survival and overall survival of all patients was 7.1 months (95% CI, 2.8 - 11.4) and 15.1 months (95% CI, 6.7 - 23.5), respectively. Age, performance status, and PIT scores were predictive prognostic factors for survival. In conclusion, although AITLs showed a good response to the initial chemotherapy, their response durations were short; therefore, chemotherapy for AITL should be modified or intensified as in high-dose chemotherapy.

Prognostic factor analysis and proposed prognostic model for conventional treatment of high-grade primary gastric lymphoma.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a clinical risk factors analysis to define a prognostic model for high-grade primary gastric lymphoma (HG-PGL). METHODS AND RESULTS: The median event-free survival and overall survival of 214 HG-PGL patients were 54 and 104.5 months, respectively, after a median follow-up duration of 60 months. According to the prognostic factor analysis, survival, advanced age, male gender, higher LDH levels and the presence of ascites were identified as independent prognostic factors for HG-PGL. We identified four groups at different risk: group 1, no adverse effect; group 2, one factor; group 3, two factors; group 4, three or four factors. The new prognostic model showed excellent prognostic capacity to differentiate subgroups according to their risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed new prognostic model for HG-PGL demonstrated a balanced distribution of patients into four groups with good prognostic capacity.