Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Braz J Urol ; 39(2): 203-8, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23683666

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Emergency double-J (DJ) stenting following ″uncomplicated″ ureteroscopic (UURS) stone treatment is both morbid and costly. Our study aims at identifying those patients who are more likely to require such an extra procedure. Handling of this complication will also be highlighted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 319 cases of UURS cases were selected out of 903 patients, who were admitted for URS stone treatment at King Abdullah University Hospital during the period from May, 2003 to December, 2010. Thirty-eight of them (11.9%) had emergency post-URS DJ stenting within 24 hours of discharge. The medical records of all UURS cases were retrospectively reviewed. Comparison in demographic and stone-related variables was made using 2-paired t-test with P < 0.05. Operative findings of 38 stented patients were outlined. RESULTS: Significant risk factors for emergency stenting were noted in males with larger (> 1.5 cm) and proximal stones (38 stented vs. 281 unstented). Operative risk factors among the 38 patients were: initial procedure time > 45 minutes (42.1%), ureteral wall edema (21.1%), repeated access for stones > 1.5 cm (21.1%), impacted stone (10.5%) and ignored or missed stones/fragments (4.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The need for emergency DJ stenting following UURS stone treatment is not uncommon. The routine insertion is impractical and weakly-supported. With risk-factor stratification, selective and individualized DJ stenting policy is recommended.


Assuntos
Stents , Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Adulto , Emergências , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento , Cálculos Ureterais/patologia , Obstrução Uretral/cirurgia
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 39(2): 203-208, Mar-Apr/2013. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-676260

RESUMO

Purpose Emergency double-J (DJ) stenting following “uncomplicated” ureteroscopic (UURS) stone treatment is both morbid and costly. Our study aims at identifying those patients who are more likely to require such an extra procedure. Handling of this complication will also be highlighted. Materials and Methods 319 cases of UURS cases were selected out of 903 patients, who were admitted for URS stone treatment at King Abdullah University Hospital during the period from May, 2003 to December, 2010. Thirty-eight of them (11.9%) had emergency post-URS DJ stenting within 24 hours of discharge. The medical records of all UURS cases were retrospectively reviewed. Comparison in demographic and stone-related variables was made using 2-paired t-test with P < 0.05. Operative findings of 38 stented patients were outlined. Results Significant risk factors for emergency stenting were noted in males with larger (>1.5 cm) and proximal stones (38 stented vs. 281 unstented). Operative risk factors among the 38 patients were: initial procedure time > 45 minutes (42.1%), ureteral wall edema (21.1%), repeated access for stones > 1.5 cm (21.1%), impacted stone (10.5%) and ignored or missed stones/fragments (4.6%). Conclusions The need for emergency DJ stenting following UURS stone treatment is not uncommon. The routine insertion is impractical and weakly-supported. With risk-factor stratification, selective and individualized DJ stenting policy is recommended. .


Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Stents , Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Emergências , Análise Fatorial , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento , Cálculos Ureterais/patologia , Obstrução Uretral/cirurgia
3.
Urol Res ; 39(6): 497-501, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21499919

RESUMO

This work was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of emergency ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones. From May 2003 to December 2010, 244 patients (184 men and 60 women, mean age 45.6 ± 12.7 years (range 22-73 years) were treated with emergency ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi. All patients were divided into three groups according to the stone location in the ureter. Intracorporeal lithotripsy when necessary was performed with the Swiss lithoclast. The overall stone-free status was defined as the complete absence of stone fragments at 4 weeks, postoperatively. A double J stent was inserted in selected patients if there was significant ureteral wall trauma, edema at the stone impaction site, suspected or proved ureteral perforation, and if the stone migrated to the kidney. The overall success rate was 90.6%. The success rates were different according to the stone site. The success rate of groups A, B and C was 69.4, 94.8 and 96.6%, respectively. The overall rate of ureteral stent insertion at the end of the procedure was 177/244 (72.5%). The rate of stent insertion was 41/49 (83.7%), 32/46 (69.6%) and 104/149 (69.8%) in groups A, B and C, respectively. The overall complication, failure, and stricture rate was 32/244 (13.1%), 23/244 (9.4%) and 0.8%, respectively. With the recent advances in ureteroscopic technology, intracorporeal probes and stone extraction devices, emergency ureteroscopy is found to be a safe and effective procedure with immediate relief from ureteral colic and ureteral stone fragmentation.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Litotripsia/métodos , Cólica Renal/etiologia , Cólica Renal/terapia , Cálculos Ureterais/complicações , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Litotripsia/instrumentação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureteroscopia/efeitos adversos , Ureteroscopia/instrumentação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...