Generics in transplantation medicine: Randomized comparison of innovator and substitution products containing mycophenolate mofetil
.

OBJECTIVE: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is widely used as an immunosuppressant for the prophylaxis of acute organ rejection in recipients of solid organ transplants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have compared, in healthy subjects, the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid when MMF was administered in the form of the innovator product CellCept (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.) or one of three commercially available generics, Renodapt (Biocon Ltd.), Mycept (Panacea Biotec), or Cellmune (Cipla Ltd.). The study was powered to detect a 20% difference in mean formulation performance measures, but not to formally evaluate bioequivalence. Geometric mean ratios of maximum concentrations (Cmax) and areas under plasma concentration-time curves were calculated. RESULTS: Comparing generics against each other, the differences in point estimates of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax of two of the comparisons were either borderline within (Renodapt/Cellmune) or clearly outside (Mycept/Cellmune) a region of 80 - 125% around the reference mean, indicating that bioequivalence between these generics may be difficult to show. CONCLUSION: Physicians in the field of transplantation should be aware of the potential risk of altering the therapeutic outcome when switching from one preparation of MMF to another. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02981290.

Effect of the Wetting Agent Sodium Lauryl Sulfate on the Pharmacokinetics of Alectinib: Results From a Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Subjects.

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor alectinib is an effective treatment for ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. This bioequivalence study evaluated the in vivo performance of test 3 formulations with the reduced wetting agent sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) content. This randomized, 4-period, 4-sequence, crossover study compared alectinib (600 mg) as 25%, 12.5%, and 3% SLS hard capsule formulations with the reference 50% SLS clinical formulation in healthy subjects under fasted conditions (n = 49), and following a high-fat meal (n = 48). Geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for Cmax , AUC0-last , and AUC0-∞ of alectinib, its major active metabolite, M4, and alectinib plus M4 were determined for the test formulations versus the reference formulation. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90%CIs were within the 80% to 125% boundaries. The 25% SLS formulation demonstrated bioequivalence to the reference 50% SLS formulation for Cmax , AUC0-last , and AUC0-∞ of alectinib, M4, and alectinib plus M4 under both fasted and fed conditions. Further reductions in SLS content (12.5% and 3% SLS) did not meet the bioequivalence criteria. Cross-group comparisons showed an approximately 3-fold positive food effect. Reducing SLS to 25% resulted in a formulation that is bioequivalent to the current 50% SLS formulation used in alectinib pivotal trials.

Efficacy and Safety of Basimglurant as Adjunctive Therapy for Major Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Antagonism of the postsynaptic metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 receptor is a novel approach to modulate glutamatergic function and has proven efficacy in a number of preclinical behavioral models of depression. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of basimglurant modified-release (MR) vs placebo as adjunctive therapy to ongoing antidepressant medication therapy in patients with MDD who had inadequate response within the current episode. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this phase 2b, double blind, randomized clinical trial of 333 adult patients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of MDD across 59 research clinics globally, patients were assigned to 1 of 2 doses of basimglurant MR (0.5 or 1.5 mg) or placebo once daily, adjunctive to ongoing antidepressant medication therapy (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor). Patients were enrolled from October 5, 2011, through July 26, 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Six-week treatment with 0.5 mg of basimglurant MR, 1.5-mg basimglurant MR, or placebo once daily, adjunctive to ongoing antidepressant medication therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the mean change from baseline score on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), as rated by the clinician at week 6. Other measures included patient-rated MADRS, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report, Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, Patient Global Impression-Improvement, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scales and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 596 patients were screened, and 333 were randomized into the study (mean [SD] age, 47 [11.2] years; 216 female [65.1%]). The primary end point (mean change in clinician-rated MADRS score from baseline to end of treatment) was not met (effect size [ES] = 0.16, P = .42; intent-to-treat [ITT] mixed-effects model for repeated measures [MMRM] analysis for comparing 1.5-mg basimglurant MR and placebo). Across secondary and exploratory end points, 1.5-mg basimglurant MR revealed larger improvements vs placebo on the patient-rated MADRS (-16.2 vs -13.3, ES = 0.28, nominal P = .04), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (-7.5 vs -5.8; ES = 0.37, nominal P = .009), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement mean score, and Patient Global Impression-Improvement mean score. Improvements were also seen in the patient-rated MADRS remission rate (36.0% vs 22.0%; nominal P = .03) and response rate (50.5% vs 40.4%; nominal P = .13), A 0.5-mg dose of basimglurant MR had no benefit over placebo in any of these measures. The most common adverse event was dizziness, which was mostly transient and of mild intensity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: No difference was observed on the study's primary outcome measure, the clinician-rated MADRS change from baseline to end of treatment, between adjunctive basimglurant MR vs placebo. Adjunctive 1.5-mg basimglurant MR daily revealed, however, an antidepressant effect across secondary end points, particularly in patient-rated measures. These findings combined with good tolerability warrant further investigation with this compound in depressive disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01437657.

Effects of Cytochrome P450 3A4 Inhibitors-Ketoconazole and Erythromycin-on Bitopertin Pharmacokinetics and Comparison with Physiologically Based Modelling Predictions.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of strong and moderate cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibition on exposure of bitopertin, a glycine reuptake inhibitor primarily metabolized by CYP3A4, and to compare the results with predictions based on physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling. METHODS: The effects of ketoconazole and erythromycin were assessed in two male volunteer studies with open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence designs. Twelve subjects were enrolled in each of the studies. In period 1, a single dose of bitopertin was administered; in period 2, 400 mg ketoconazole was administered once daily for 17 days or 500 mg erythromycin was administered twice daily for 21 days. A single dose of bitopertin was coadministered on day 5. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by non-compartmental methods. Simulated bitopertin profiles using dynamic PBPK modelling for a typical healthy volunteer in GastroPlus(®) were used to predict changes in pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers, coadministration of ketoconazole increased the bitopertin area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 312 h (AUC0-312h) 4.2-fold (90 % confidence interval [CI] 3.5-5.0) and erythromycin increased the AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) 2.1-fold (90 % CI 1.9-2.3). The peak concentration (C max) increased by <25 % in both studies. Simulated bitopertin profiles using PBPK modelling showed good agreement with the observed AUC ratios in both studies. The predicted AUC0-inf ratios for the interaction with ketoconazole and erythromycin were 7.7 and 1.9, respectively. CONCLUSION: Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors increase AUC0-inf of bitopertin 7- to 8-fold and hence should not be administered concomitantly with bitopertin. Moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors double AUC0-inf.

The effect of aleglitazar on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of S- and R-warfarin in healthy male subjects.

: Aleglitazar acts through balanced activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α and γ; warfarin is a commonly prescribed anticoagulant. Given the extent of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, cotreatment with aleglitazar and warfarin is likely in this population. This open-label, randomized, 2-period, crossover study in 12 healthy male subjects investigated the potential for drug-drug interactions between warfarin and aleglitazar (final data drawn from 11 white subjects). The primary objective was to investigate the effect of aleglitazar on the pharmacokinetic properties of S-warfarin and on the pharmacodynamics of the racemic mixture; the secondary objectives included the effect of aleglitazar on R-warfarin pharmacokinetics and of racemic warfarin on aleglitazar pharmacokinetics. Subjects were randomized to single-dose warfarin on day 1 or aleglitazar once daily (12 days) plus single-dose warfarin on day 6 followed by a 14-day washout period, then crossover. Coadministration of aleglitazar reduced S- and R-warfarin exposure (AUC0-∞) by 18% and 13%, respectively, but did not change its pharmacodynamic effects (prothrombin time and factor VII activity). After warfarin dosing, aleglitazar trough concentrations remained within the same range. These findings indicate that coadministration of aleglitazar and warfarin is unlikely to affect the efficacy or safety of either agent.

Evaluation of the effects of bitopertin (RG1678) on cardiac repolarization: a thorough corrected QT study in healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Bitopertin (RG1678) is a selective glycine reuptake inhibitor currently in Phase III development for the treatment of schizophrenia. Thorough QT studies to assess the effects of candidate drugs on cardiac repolarization and proarrhythmic potential are required by regulatory authorities and are a common part of the drug development process. A clinically relevant effect on QT interval is suspected if prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc) is ∼5 milliseconds or more, evidenced by an upper 1-sided 95% CI for the mean effect on the QTc of at least 10 milliseconds. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of bitopertin on the QTc interval in healthy male volunteers. METHODS: This was a multiple-dose, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study using bitopertin 30 mg (n = 56) or bitopertin 175 mg (n = 56) once daily for 10 days plus placebo on day 11, moxifloxacin 400 mg on day 1 plus placebo once daily for 10 days (n = 29), or placebo once daily for 10 days plus moxifloxacin 400 mg on day 11 (n = 28). Continuous Holter ECGs were obtained on days -1, 1, 10, and 11, and the placebo-corrected mean change from time-matched baseline in the QT interval calculated by using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) on day 10 was the primary end point. Pharmacokinetic parameters of bitopertin were determined on day 10 by using HPLC-MS/MS methods to obtain bitopertin plasma drug concentrations. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 169 predominantly white, healthy male volunteers (mean age, 31.8 years; range, 19-59 years) were randomized to treatment; 162 completed the study. The mean change in placebo-corrected QTcF from baseline to day 10 of bitopertin ranged from -2.8 to 3.9 milliseconds. The upper bound of the 1-sided 95% CI was <10 milliseconds at all time points with both doses. There was no relation between bitopertin concentrations and changes in QTcF or other ECG variables. Assay sensitivity was confirmed by a placebo-corrected mean change from time-matched baseline in QTcF of 10.6 milliseconds (lower bound of the 1-sided 98.3% CI, 6.9 milliseconds) 4 hours after moxifloxacin administration. Peak bitopertin plasma concentrations were achieved ∼4 hours after dosing. The terminal elimination t(½) was ∼53 hours. No safety or tolerability concerns were noted with bitopertin at either dose. Dizziness, nausea, and blurred vision were more common in the bitopertin 175-mg group compared with the bitopertin 30-mg or placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Multiple dosing with bitopertin 30 mg or 175 mg did not affect QTcF in these healthy male volunteers. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01613040.

Utility of serum HER2 extracellular domain assessment in clinical decision making: pooled analysis of four trials of trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Trastuzumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy has been shown to be effective in patients with HER2-positive early and metastatic breast cancer. The extracellular domain (ECD) of the HER2 protein may be shed into the serum and is detectable using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Correlations have been reported between raised baseline ECD levels and response to trastuzumab, suggesting that serum ECD levels may be useful in making treatment decisions in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. We investigated this relationship, and also the effect of trastuzumab and chemotherapy on ECD levels, in patients with advanced breast cancer. METHODS: This study analyzed sequential ECD determinations on 322 patients treated with six different treatment regimens in four clinical trials. RESULTS: Baseline values were available in 296 patients, and of these, 205 (69%) had raised levels (> 15 ng/mL). No clear relationship was found between baseline ECD levels and tumor response. After initiating combination therapy, ECD levels declined irrespective of treatment received and tumor response. For trastuzumab monotherapy, some trend between changes in ECD levels in early cycles and best response was discernable, but the overlap was too broad to be clinically useful. Disease progression was not reliably predicted by rising ECD levels in the majority of patients. CONCLUSION: Based on our data, we cannot recommend using serum HER2 ECD levels to make trastuzumab or other treatment decisions for individual patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer.

Absence of an interaction between iron and mycophenolate mofetil absorption.

AIM: To determine whether concomitant iron affects the absorption of mycophenolate mofetil. METHODS: An open-label, single centre, randomized, crossover trial was conducted in 16 healthy males. Fasting subjects received mycophenolate mofetil alone (treatment A) or co-administered with iron (treatment B). RESULTS: The mycophenolic acid AUC(0,24 h) for treatments A and B were 42.5 +/- 10.5 and 44.7 +/- 12.4 microg ml(-1) h, respectively. anova modelling showed the relative bioavailability of mycophenolate mofetil to be similar for the two treatments (90% confidence interval 0.92, 1.19). CONCLUSIONS: There was no interaction between mycophenolate mofetil and iron supplements administered concomitantly to healthy fasting subjects.

Population pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: A nonlinear mixed effect model was based on pharmacokinetic data from phase I, II, and III studies of 476 patients. The phase I study enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors. The phase II and III studies enrolled patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Patients in the pivotal phase II and III studies were treated with a 4 mg/kg loading dose of trastuzumab followed by 2 mg/kg weekly for up to 840 days. The model adequately predicted observed trastuzumab concentrations. Model stability and performance were verified using bootstrap simulations. Percentiles, mean, and standard deviation of observed levels were compared with their distributions from 100 replicates of datasets simulated under the model. RESULTS: A two-compartment linear pharmacokinetic model best described the data and accounted for the long-term accumulation observed following weekly administration of trastuzumab. Population estimates from the base model for clearance (CL) and volume of distribution of the central compartment (V1) of trastuzumab were 0.225 L/day, and 2.95 L, respectively. Estimated terminal halflife (t1/2) based on the population estimate was 28.5 days. Interpatient variabilities in clearance and volume were 43 and 29%, respectively. The number of metastatic sites, plasma level of extracellular domain of the HER2 receptor, and patient weight were significant baseline covariates for clearance, volume, or both (P<0.005). However, these covariate effects on trastuzumab exposure were modest and not clinically important in comparison with the large inter-patient variability of CL. Concomitant chemotherapy (anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide, or paclitaxel) did not appear to influence clearance. CONCLUSION: This population pharmacokinetic model can predict trastuzumab exposure in the long-term treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer and provide comparison of alternative dosage regimens via simulation.

Single ascending dose tolerability, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor Ro 09-4889.

PURPOSE: Ro 09-4889 was designed to enhance the anticancer efficacy of capecitabine (Xeloda) by generating a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor (DPDi) 5-vinyluracil (5-VU) preferentially in tumor tissues. This study assessed the tolerance to Ro 09-4889 treatment, and related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data such as inhibition of DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and plasma uracil levels. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study in 64 healthy male volunteers at 1-, 5-, 20-, 50-, 75-, 100-, and 200-mg oral dose of Ro 09-4889. Also, food effect was assessed separately in a group dosed with 20 mg of the compound. RESULTS: No serious adverse effects or significant laboratory and electrocardiogram abnormalities were observed during the study. Ro 09-4889 has a short elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of 0.5 h, followed by metabolites 5'-deoxy-5-vinyluridine (5'-DVUR), 5'-deoxy-5-vinylcytidine (5'-DVCR), and 5-VU with t(1/2) of 1.3, 1.2, and 2 h, respectively. The major metabolite excreted in urine was 5-DVCR (45% of dose). The inhibition of PBMC DPD activity and the increase in plasma uracil were related to Ro 09-4889 dose. DPD inhibition versus dose and uracil AUC (area under the curve) versus dose were modeled using the E(max) model with a baseline effect. The model-predicted ED(50) value was 100 mg. CONCLUSION: Single oral doses of Ro 09-4889 ranging from 1 to 200 mg were well tolerated. On the basis of these findings, a 10-to-30-mg dose range of Ro 09-4889 combined with capecitabine could be appropriate for further evaluation in cancer patients.

Equivalent pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in African-American and Caucasian male and female stable renal allograft recipients.

African-American (AA) renal transplant recipients require higher doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) than Caucasians. A hypothesized pharmacokinetic (PK) difference was tested in stable renal transplant recipients. Whole blood was collected before, and 20, 40 and 75 min, and 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after the MMF dose. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its glucuronide metabolite (MPAG) were analyzed using HPLC. Analysis of variance was performed for the primary end-points of dose-adjusted PK parameters AUC0-12 and Cmax of MPA using log-transformed values. Differences between races and genders were estimated: 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Back-transformation gave estimates of the race and gender ratio and their CI. Equivalence of the groups was determined if the 90% confidence limits were included in the interval (0.80, 1.25). The calculated PK parameters were comparable among the four subgroups (Caucasian, AA, Male, Female). The 90% CIs for the ratio of dose-adjusted AUC0-12 of MPA between races were between 89.7 and 112.9%. There were no race, gender or race-by-gender effects (p-values = 0.196) nor differences between diabetics and nondiabetics. This study demonstrates that dosing requirement for MMF in AA and Caucasians is unlikely to be related to different exposures to MPA.

Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of capecitabine (Xeloda) in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites in cancer patients. Capecitabine (Xeloda) is an orally administered precursor of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), which is preferentially activated to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in tumors. METHODS: A total of 27 patients were enrolled, of whom 24 were evaluable for pharmacokinetics (6 with normal renal function, 8 with mild, 6 with moderate, and 4 with severe renal impairment at baseline). Patients received capecitabine orally at the standard dosing regimen (1250 mg/m(2) capecitabine twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period). On study days 1 and 14, blood samples were collected to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites. The relationship between the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) was assessed by log-linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The primary pharmacokinetic parameter with respect to the effect of renal dysfunction was systemic exposure to 5'-DFUR, 5-FU and FBAL determined on study day 14. Renal impairment led to an increase in the systemic exposure to 5'-DFUR and FBAL (23% and 109% increase in AUC, respectively) for a 50% reduction in CL(CR). By contrast, renal impairment may lead to decreased exposure to 5'-DFCR. There was no evidence for an effect of renal impairment on systemic exposure to 5-FU or capecitabine. Renal impairment did not have a major effect on peak concentration (C(max)) or elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of capecitabine, 5'-DFCR, 5'-DFUR, and 5-FU. However, in the case of FBAL, moderate or severe renal impairment caused up to a twofold increase in C(max) and prolongation of t(1/2). All patients with severe renal impairment (four patients) had drug-related grade 3 or 4 adverse-events (AEs) and serious AEs. Patients with moderate renal impairment experienced a similar number of grade 3 or 4 AEs (six of nine patients) but had a higher incidence of serious AEs (three of nine patients) when compared with those with normal renal function (four of six patients and one of six patients, respectively). A similar effect was seen in patients with mild renal dysfunction (grade 3 or 4 AEs in four of eight patients; serious AEs in three of eight patients). The relationship between systemic exposure to capecitabine or its metabolites and safety was investigated using logistic regression. This exploratory analysis showed a strong positive relationship between AUC of 5'-DFUR and treatment-related grade 3 or 4 AEs, whereas there was no relationship with exposure to capecitabine, 5'-DFCR, 5-FU or FBAL. CONCLUSIONS: Renal impairment has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine or 5-FU, but leads to an increase in the systemic exposure to 5'-DFUR and FBAL. However, only the AUC of 5'-DFUR is correlated with safety. Based on the safety results in patients with severe renal impairment, a dose modification cannot be recommended for these patients and they should not be treated with capecitabine. Additional data from the clinical safety database and pharmacokinetic results from the present study support the recommendation that patients with moderate renal impairment should be treated with 75% of the recommended standard starting dose to achieve systemic exposure comparable to that in patients with normal renal function.