Novel and innovative resuscitation systems in Japan.

Aim: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a life-threatening emergency that requires rapid and efficient intervention. Recently, several novel approaches have emerged and have been incorporated into resuscitation systems in some local areas of Japan. This review describes innovative resuscitation systems and highlights their strengths. Main text: First, we discuss the deployment of a physician-staffed ambulance, in which emergency physicians offer advanced resuscitation to patients with OHCA on site. In addition, we describe the experimental practice of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECPR) in a prehospital setting. Second, we describe a physician-staffed helicopter, wherein a medical team provides advanced resuscitation at the scene. We also explain their initiative to provide early ECPR, even in remote areas. Finally, we provide an overview of the "hybrid ER" system which is a "one-fits-all" resuscitation bay equipped with computed tomography and fluoroscopy equipment. This system is expected to help swiftly identify and rule out irreversible causes of cardiac arrest, such as massive subarachnoid hemorrhage, and implement ECPR without delay. Conclusion: Although these revolutionary approaches may improve the outcomes of patients with OHCA, evidence of their effectiveness remains limited. In addition, it is crucial to ensure cost-effectiveness and sustainability. We will continue to work diligently to assess the effectiveness of these systems and focus on the development of cost-effective and sustainable systems.

Blood Purification in Patients with Sepsis Associated with Acute Kidney Injury: A Narrative Review.

Sepsis leads to organ dysfunction. Acute kidney injury, a common type of organ dysfunction, is associated with a high mortality rate in patients with sepsis. Kidney replacement therapy can correct the metabolic, electrolyte, and fluid imbalances caused by acute kidney injury. While this therapy can improve outcomes, evidence of its beneficial effects is lacking. Herein, we review the indications for blood purification therapy, including kidney replacement therapy, and the current knowledge regarding acute kidney injury in terms of renal and non-renal indications. While renal indications have been well-documented, indications for blood purification therapy in sepsis (non-renal indications) remain controversial. Excessive inflammation is an important factor in the development of sepsis; blood purification therapy has been shown to reduce inflammatory mediators and improve hemodynamic instability. Given the pathophysiology of sepsis, blood purification therapy may decrease mortality rates in these patients. Further trials are needed in order to establish the effectiveness of blood purification therapy for sepsis.

Intubation during a medevac flight: safety and effect on total prehospital time in the helicopter emergency medical service system.

INTRODUCTION: The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) commonly intubates patients who require advanced airway support prior to takeoff. In-flight intubation (IFI) is avoided because it is considered difficult due to limited space, difficulty communicating, and vibration in flight. However, IFI may shorten the total prehospital time. We tested whether IFI can be performed safely by the HEMS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adult patients transported from 2010 to 2017 who received prehospital, non-emergent intubation from a single HEMS. We divided the cohort in two groups, patients intubated during flight (flight group, FG) and patients intubated before takeoff (ground group, GG). The primary outcome was the proportion of successful intubations. Secondary outcomes included total prehospital time and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: We analyzed 376 patients transported during the study period, 192 patients in the FG and 184 patients in the GG. The intubation success rate did not differ between the two groups (FG 189/192 [98.4%] vs. GG 179/184 [97.3%], p = 0.50). There were also no differences in hypoxia (FG 4/117 [3.4%] vs. GG 4/95 [4.2%], p = 1.00) or hypotension (FG 6/117 [5.1%] vs. GG 5/95 [5.3%], p = 1.00) between the two groups. Scene time and total prehospital time were shorter in the FG (scene time 7 min vs. 14 min, p <  0.001; total prehospital time 33.5 min vs. 40.0 min, p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IFI was safely performed with high success rates, similar to intubation on the ground, without increasing the risk of hypoxia or hypotension. IFI by experienced providers shortened transportation time, which may improve patient outcomes.