Post-marketing assessment of neuropsychiatric adverse events in influenza patients treated with oseltamivir: an updated review.

A 2008 review by our group concluded that the risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs) in influenza patients was not increased by oseltamivir exposure, and did not identify any mechanism by which oseltamivir or its metabolites could cause or worsen such events. The current article reviews new information on this topic. Between September 16, 2007 and May 15, 2010, 1,805 spontaneously-reported NPAEs were identified in 1,330 patients receiving oseltamivir: 767 (42.5%) from Japan, 296 (16.4%) from the USA, and 742 (41.1%) from other countries. NPAEs were more common in children: 1,072 (59.4%) events were in those aged ≤16 years. NPAEs often occurred within 48 h of treatment initiation (953 events; 52.8%). Nearly half of the events were serious in nature (838; 46.4%). The three largest categories of events were abnormal behavior (457 events, 25.3%), miscellaneous psychiatric events (370; 20.5%), and delusions/perceptual disturbances (316 events, 17.5%). A total of 1,545 events (85.6%) in eight different categories were considered to be delirium or delirium-like. Twenty-eight suicide-related events were reported. A US healthcare claims database analysis showed that the risk of NPAEs in 7,798 oseltamivir-treated patients was no higher than that in 10,411 patients not on antivirals, but a study on oseltamivir and abnormal behavior in Japan was less conclusive. NPAE frequency in oseltamivir-exposed Japanese and Taiwanese children with influenza was the same as in unexposed children. New analysis of the UK General Practice Research Database showed that the relative adjusted risk of NPAEs in influenza patients was 2.18-times higher than in the general population. Other epidemiology studies report frequent occurrence of encephalitis and similar disorders in influenza patients independently of oseltamivir exposure. The new data support the findings of the original assessment. Evidence suggests that influenza-related encephalopathies are caused by influenza-induced inflammatory responses, but more work is needed to confirm the underlying mechanisms.

Absence of central nervous system and hypothermic effects after single oral administration of high doses of oseltamivir in the rat.

Oseltamivir is widely used for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza. Renewed interest in the central nervous system (CNS) tolerability profile of oseltamivir has been triggered by the reports of neuropsychiatric adverse events in patients with influenza. In addition, a recent pre-clinical study in rodents suggested a hypothermic effect of oseltamivir. The current studies investigated the CNS effects, body temperature effect and toxicokinetic profile of oseltamivir in rats. The CNS/temperature study included three groups receiving oseltamivir (500, 763 and 1000 mg/kg free base by oral gavage), one vehicle/control group and one reference group (D-amphetamine, 10 mg/kg). CNS parameters (behaviour, motor activity and co-ordination and sensory/motor reflex responses) and rectal temperature were measured at baseline and at five intervals until 8 hr after dosing. In the toxicokinetic study, rats received oseltamivir by oral gavage at 763 or 1000 mg/kg free base. Plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and perfused brain concentrations of oseltamivir and its active metabolite, oseltamivir carboxylate (OC), were measured until 8 hr after dosing. Median scores for CNS parameters were similar in controls and animals receiving oseltamivir at all time points. Oseltamivir had no physiologically relevant effect on body temperature, but induced a short-lived and small dose-independent decrease in temperature in all active treatment groups at 1 hr after dosing only. Plasma concentrations of OC were higher than of oseltamivir, but the reverse was true in CSF and brain. CNS penetration was low for both moieties. In rats, oseltamivir at supratherapeutic doses up to 1000 mg/kg free base did not exert any effects on CNS function or hypothermic effects and led to limited CNS exposure, resulting in large safety margins.

Use of mefloquine in children - a review of dosage, pharmacokinetics and tolerability data.

BACKGROUND: Use of anti-malarial medication in children is hampered by a paucity of dosage, pharmacokinetic and tolerability data. METHODS: Data on the use of mefloquine in children, particularly in young children weighing less than 20 kg, were reviewed using PubMed literature and reports on file. RESULTS: Chemoprophylaxis data: Two studies with a total of 170 children were found. A simulated mefloquine plasma profile showed that doses to achieve protective chemoprophylaxis blood concentration of mefloquine of approximately 620 ng/mL (or 1.67 µmol/L) in children should be at least 5 mg/kg. This simulated plasma profile in children corresponds to that seen in adult travellers using a weekly prophylaxis dose of 250 mg. This reinforces current practice of using weight-based dosage for children. Clearance per body weight is higher in older children. For children who travel to malaria risk areas tablets can be broken and crushed as required. It is necessary to disguise the bitter taste of the drug. Treatment data: Mefloquine treatment (alone or in combination) data are available for more than 6000 children of all age and weight categories. The stereoselectivity and pharmacokinetic profile of mefloquine in children is similar to that observed in adults. There is higher clearance in older children (aged 5-12 years) compared to younger children (aged 6-24 months). Mefloquine treatment is well tolerated in infants (5-12 kg) but vomiting is a problem at high doses. This led to the use of a "split dose" regimen with 15 mg/kg initially, followed 12 hours later by 10 mg/kg. Mefloquine 125 mg has been used as intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) and was found to be efficacious in reducing episodes of malaria in a moderate-transmission setting but vomiting was a problem in 8% of children aged 2-11 months. Mefloquine is also used as a component of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) in small children. The combination artesunate plus mefloquine is a WHO approved first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in Africa. CONCLUSION: Currently available data provide a scientific basis for the use of mefloquine in small children in the chemoprophylaxis setting and as a part of treatment regimens for children living in endemic areas.