Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 828: 154316, 2022 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35257762

RESUMO

Minimum tillage, residue recycling and the use of cover crops are key elements of conservation agriculture that play important roles in soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) dynamics. This study determined the long-term effects of tillage practice (conventional ploughing vs. direct seeding), straw management (retained vs. removed), and the presence of a cover crop (CC; fodder radish in this study) on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, nitrate (NO3-) leaching, and soil mineral N dynamics between October 2019 and June 2020. In the factorial experiment with eight treatment combinations, cumulative N2O emissions ranged from 0.04 to 0.8 kg N ha-1, whereas NO3- leaching varied between 4 and 28 kg N ha-1. The study did not find effects of straw retention on NO3- leaching or N2O emissions. No-till reduced N2O emissions by on average 46% compared to ploughing. Fodder radish reduced NO3- leaching by 80-84%, and there was little N2O emission in the presence of the cover crop; however, after termination in spring there was a flush of N2O, cumulative N2O-N averaged 0.1 and 0.5 kg N ha-1 without and with a cover crop. With information about long-term soil C retention from straw and fodder radish, an overall greenhouse (GHG) balance was calculated for each system. Without straw retention after harvest, there was always a positive net GHG emission, and the indirect N2O emission from NO3- leaching was similar to, or greater than direct N2O emissions. However, in the presence of fodder radish, the direct N2O emissions after termination were much more important than indirect emissions, and negated the C input from fodder radish. Direct seeding, straw retention and the use of a cover crop showed positive effects on N retention and/or GHG balance and could substantially improve the carbon footprint of agroecosystems on sandy soil in a wet temperate climate.


Assuntos
Óxido Nitroso , Solo , Agricultura , Fertilizantes/análise , Nitratos , Óxido Nitroso/análise , Areia , Solo/química
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 815: 152744, 2022 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34979225

RESUMO

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions are highly variable in space and time due to the complex interplay between soil, management practices and weather conditions. Micrometeorological techniques integrate emissions over large areas at high temporal resolution. This allows identification of causes of intra- and inter-annual variability of N2O emissions and development of robust emission factors (EF). Here, we investigated factors responsible for variability in N2O emissions during growing and non-growing seasons of corn and soybeans grown in an imperfectly drained silt loam soil, in Ontario, Canada. We used quasi-continuously (at half-hourly to hourly intervals) N2O fluxes measured via the flux-gradient technique over 11 years for corn and 5 years for soybeans and evaluated the uncertainty of default IPCC and Canada-specific EFs. In the growing season, emissions were controlled by soil nitrate content, soil moisture and temperature in the fertilized corn, while moisture and temperature regulated N2O emissions in the unfertilized soybeans. In the non-growing season, nitrogen (N) input from the crop residue did not affect the emissions, pointing to freeze-thaw cycles as mechanisms for enhanced N2O emissions. The non-growing season contribution to annual emissions was 38% in corn and 43% in soybeans. On average, annual emissions were 2.6-fold higher in corn than soybeans. Observed mean N2O EFs were 0.84% (0.12-2.02%) for growing season and 1.69% (0.29-7.32%) for yearly emissions. The growing season EF derived from long-term N2O emissions was 0.9 ± 0.14%. The interannual variability in N2O emissions and EFs can be attributed to management practices and annual weather variability. The default IPCC approach based on overall N input had poorer performance in predicting annual N2O emissions compared to the current Canadian methodology, which includes management and environmental factor in addition to N inputs. The observed emissions were further evaluated with a newly developed growing season N2O emission prediction approach for Canada. However, performance of the approach was poorer than IPCC or the current national Canadian approach. Additional tests of the new national methodology are recommended as well as consideration of non-growing season emissions.


Assuntos
Glycine max , Zea mays , Agricultura , Clima Frio , Fertilizantes/análise , Óxido Nitroso/análise , Ontário , Solo , Tempo (Meteorologia)
3.
J Environ Manage ; 260: 110165, 2020 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32090850

RESUMO

Cropping of maize (Zea mays L.) on sandy soil in wet climates involves a significant risk for nitrogen (N) losses, since nitrate added in fertilizers or produced from residues and manure may be lost outside the period with active crop N uptake. This one-year lysimeter experiment investigated the potential of Vizura®, a formulation for liquid manure (slurry) with the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP), to mitigate nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and nitrate (NO3-) leaching from a coarse sandy soil cropped with maize. Maize followed grass-clover (Lolium perenne L.-Trifolium pratense L.) with spring incorporation and was fertilised with cattle slurry. A total of 12 treatments in triplicate were included in a factorial experiment with 1 m2 large and 1.4 m deep lysimeters: 1) with or without spraying the above-ground biomass of grass-clover with DMPP before incorporation; 2) application of cattle manure with or without DMPP, or no fertilization; and 3) natural rainfall or extra rain events to represent wet spring conditions, which were simulated with an automated and programmable irrigation system. Around 20 kg N ha-1 was returned to the soil in grass-clover above-ground biomass, and 145 kg N ha-1 in cattle manure. Cumulative annual N2O emissions ranged from 0.4 to 1.3 kg N ha-1, with between 49 and 86% of emissions occurring during spring. Manure application increased N2O emissions, while extra rainfall had no effect. The mitigation of N2O emissions by DMPP ranged from 46 to 67% under natural, and from 44 to 48% under high rainfall conditions. Total annual NO3- leaching ranged from 65 to 162 kg N ha-1. The extent of NO3- leaching to 1.4 m depth during spring was low, and instead most (72-83%) of total annual NO3--N leaching was recorded during autumn before harvest. The extra rainfall during spring increased NO3--N leaching in the pre-harvest period, but it is not clear to what extent this was associated with the N in grass-clover residues or manure applied in spring, or from N mineralisation below the root zone. Despite evidence for a reduction of NO3- leaching in three of four scenarios, overall this effect was not significant. No DMPP was detected in leachates. In conclusion, DMPP significantly reduced N2O emissions from cattle manure on this sandy loam soil independent of rainfall, while there was no significant effect on NO3- leaching. The results indicate that N2O emissions and NO3--N leaching were partly derived from below-ground sources of N not affected by DMPP, which should be further investigated to better predict the mitigation potential of nitrification inhibitors.


Assuntos
Óxido Nitroso , Trifolium , Agricultura , Animais , Bovinos , Fertilizantes , Esterco , Medicago , Nitrogênio , Fosfatos , Poaceae , Pirazóis , Areia , Solo , Zea mays
4.
J Environ Qual ; 44(4): 1063-70, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26437087

RESUMO

Nitrate supplements to cattle diets can reduce enteric CH emissions. However, if NO metabolism stimulates NO emissions, the effectiveness of dietary NO for CH mitigation will be reduced. We quantified NO emissions as part of a dairy cow feeding experiment in which urea was substituted in nearly iso-N diets with 0, 5, 14 or 21 g NO kg dry matter (DM). The feeding experiment was a Latin square with repetition of Period 1. Each period lasted 4 wk, with CH emission measurements in Week 4 using respiration chambers. During Period 3, NO concentrations in chamber outlet air were monitored semicontinuously during 48 h. High, but fluctuating, NO concentrations were seen at the two highest NO levels (up to between 2 and 5 µL L), and dynamics were linked with recent feed intake. In Periods 4 and 5, NO concentrations and feed intake were determined from all four respiration chambers during two 7-h periods. Emissions of NO coincided with feed intake, again with NO concentrations in the microliter per liter range at the two highest NO intake levels. Neither feed nor excretion of NO via urine were significant sources of NO, indicating that emissions came from the animals. Leakages due to rumen fistulation could also not account for NO emissions. The possibility that NO is produced in the oral cavity is discussed. Nitrous oxide emission factors ranged between 0.7 and 1.0% except in one case at 21 g NO kg DM, where it was 3.4%. When accounting for NO emissions at the highest NO intake level, the overall GHG mitigation effect in two different animal-diet combinations changed from -47 to -40%, and from -19 to -17%, respectively, due to NO emissions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...