Sonographic Measurement of the Patellar Tendon Should Predict Autograft Bone Patellar Tendon Bone (BPTB) Size: Comparison of Anatomical and Clinical Findings.

The use of BPTB autograft is frequently used in ACL reconstruction, however, the risk of potential failure in patients with an anatomically unfavorable patellar tendon may predispose to reconstruction failure. Anatomical study of the extensor apparatus of the knee can provide knowledge about the best option obtain the graft and perform a better preoperative planning. Musculoskeletal ultrasound is a simple, reproducible, affordable technique that could be valid for patellar tendon evaluation. The objective of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility of the patellar tendon measurements by ultrasound and compare them with anatomical measurements, both in cadaver and patients undergoing ACLR. The study consists of two phases; first anatomical study in cadaver. The ultrasound measurement was performed by determining the length, width and thickness of the patellar tendon, both by ultrasound and anatomical dissection. The second phase is a cohort of 42 patients pending surgical ACLR. Previous ultrasound and intraoperative measurements were obtained. Regarding the anatomical study, statistical analysis did not show any differences comparing the measurements in length (p = ns) and thickness (p = ns) of the patellar tendon, although differences were obtained when comparing the results obtained for the width of the tendon after the ultrasound and anatomical measurement (p < 0.001). Same results were obtained in second phase of the study. The reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of the PT is comparable to intraoperatively measurements (without width measurement). These findings can be useful for preoperative planning in the reconstruction of ACL with BPTB Graft and to assess technical modifications prior to surgery.

Assessing long-term return to play after hip arthroscopy in football players evaluating risk factors for good prognosis.

PURPOSE: Groin pain is the third most common disease in football players and has often been associated with hip pathology such as femoroacetabular impingement and labral lesions. Hip arthroscopy offers possibilities of function restoration via minimally invasive procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate professional football player's injuries and their return to play after hip arthroscopy for FAI and labral injuries. METHODS: Patients that underwent hip arthroscopy between 2009 and 2014 were selected retrospectively. From this population, only professional soccer players competing at national level were included (Tegner 10). Arthroscopic surgery was proposed in patients with persistent pain. All patients were assessed for VAS score preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-op. HOS (sport and DLA) and mHHS tests were performed at the same time periods. RESULTS: All patients were men with a mean age of 26.5 ± 7.1 years old. Preoperative VAS (7.4 ± 1.3), HOS ADL (67.7 ± 5.5), HOS sport (37.6 ± 18.7) and mHHS (72.5 ± 8.8) showed improved scores during long-term follow-up. Time to return to play was 10.8 months (SD ± 4.3), with range between 4 and 20 months. Mean follow-up was 45.4 ± 15.6 months (range from 26 to 72 months). No differences were observed between non-active and active patients at final follow-up with respect to chondral lesions, but significant differences were observed with reference to management of the labrum (p = 0.031), where a higher rate of labrectomies existed among inactive patients and a higher rate of suture among active patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroscopy is a safe procedure with very good return to play results, but for optimized return to football one should consider patient age at the time of surgery, the condition of the labrum and low scores on the Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and HOS (sport version) as predictive factors for poor prognosis. Level of evidence IV.

Leiomyosarcoma of the hand.

Soft-tissue sarcomas of the hand are rare and the devastating effect of an undiagnosed sarcoma warrants clinical vigilance. We present the case of an unsuspected leiomyosarcoma localised in the hand in order to underline (i) the rarity of the disease in this site, (ii) the role of adequate surgical treatment in the first step, (iii) the relationship with adjuvant treatments, lymph node metastasis and the poor prognosis of this tumour.