Prevention of preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the preventive strategies for preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to December 2023 with no filters. Additionally, the reference lists of the included studies were manually examined to identify any supplementary studies. We selected randomized controlled trials and cohorts comparing interventions to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. A random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio version 4.3.1. Randomized controlled trials and cohorts were assessed respectively using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions tool and Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. RESULTS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included eight studies comprising a total of 719 patients. Compared with expectant management, cerclage stood out as the only intervention associated with an increase in the survival of at least one twin (risk ratio 1.12; 95 % confidence interval 1.01-1.23). Our subgroup analysis based on different thresholds for short cervix demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth before 32 weeks with ultrasound-indicated cerclage using a 15 mm criterion (risk ratio 0.65; 95 % confidence interval 0.47-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the potential benefit of cerclage as a preventive strategy for preterm birth in pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. These findings highlight the necessity for further investigation to corroborate our results and address the optimal threshold for ultrasound-indicated cerclage.

Prophylactic tranexamic acid in Cesarean delivery: an updated meta-analysis with a trial sequential analysis.

PURPOSE: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Although several studies on the prophylactic use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery have been published, conflicting results raise questions regarding its use. Thus, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of PPH prophylaxis with TXA. SOURCE: We searched PubMed®, Embase, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic TXA with placebo or no treatment in parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery. Our main outcomes were PPH, any blood transfusion, need for additional uterotonics, and adverse events. We performed a trial sequential analysis (TSA) of all outcomes to investigate the reliability and conclusiveness of findings. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We included 38 RCTs including 22,940 parturients, 11,535 (50%) of whom were randomized to receive prophylactic TXA. Patients treated with TXA had significantly fewer cases of PPH (risk ratio [RR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.69; P < 0.001); less blood transfusion (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.61; P < 0.001), and less use of additional uterotonics (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.68; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of adverse effects and thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic TXA administration for parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery significantly reduced blood loss, without increasing adverse events, supporting its use as a safe and effective strategy for reducing PPH in this population. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023422188); first submitted 27 April 2023.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'hémorragie du post-partum (HPP) est l'une des principales causes de mortalité maternelle dans le monde. Bien que plusieurs études sur l'utilisation prophylactique d'acide tranexamique (TXA) chez les personnes parturientes ayant accouché par césarienne aient été publiées, des résultats contradictoires soulèvent des questions quant à son utilisation. Ainsi, nous avons cherché à étudier l'innocuité et l'efficacité de la prophylaxie à base de TXA pour l'HPP. SOURCES: Nous avons fait une recherche sur PubMed®, Embase, Cochrane Central et ClinicalTrials.gov pour en tirer les études randomisées contrôlées (ERC) comparant le TXA prophylactique à un placebo ou à l'absence de traitement chez les personnes parturientes accouchant par césarienne. Nos principaux critères d'évaluation étaient l'HPP, toute transfusion sanguine, la nécessité d'un utérotonique supplémentaire et les événements indésirables. Nous avons effectué une analyse séquentielle des études pour tous les résultats afin d'examiner la fiabilité et le caractère concluant des conclusions. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Nous avons inclus 38 ERC comprenant 22 940 personnes parturientes, dont 11 535 (50 %) ont été randomisées pour recevoir du TXA prophylactique. La patientèle traitée par TXA présentait significativement moins de cas d'HPP (risque relatif [RR], 0,51; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,38 à 0,69; P < 0,001); moins de transfusion sanguine (RR, 0,43; IC 95 %, 0,30 à 0,61; P < 0,001) et moins d'utilisation d'utérotoniques supplémentaires (RR, 0,52; IC 95 %, 0,40 à 0,68; P < 0,001). Aucune différence significative n'a été constatée entre les groupes en termes d'effets indésirables et d'événements thromboemboliques. CONCLUSION: L'administration prophylactique de TXA pour les personnes parturientes accouchant par césarienne a considérablement réduit les pertes de sang sans augmenter les événements indésirables, ce qui soutient son utilisation comme stratégie sécuritaire et efficace pour réduire l'HPP dans cette population. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42023422188); première soumission le 27 avril 2023.