Clinical experiences and learning curves from robot-assisted neurosurgical biopsies with Stealth Autoguide™.

Background: Biopsies of intracranial lesions are a cornerstone in the diagnosis of unresectable tumors to guide neurooncological treatment; however, the procedure is also associated with risks. The results from the cranial robot guidance system Stealth Autoguide™ were studied after introduction at a neurosurgical department. Primary aims include the presentation of clinical and radiological data, accuracy of radiological diagnosis, learning curves of the new technology, diagnostic yield, and precision. The secondary aim was to study complications. Methods: Retrospective data inclusion was performed on patients ≥ 18 years undergoing biopsy with Stealth Autoguide™ due to suspected brain tumors in the first 3 years after the introduction of the technique. Data regarding clinical characteristics, intraoperative variables, pathological diagnosis, and complications were recorded. Analyses of learning curves were performed. Results: A total of 79 procedures were performed on 78 patients with a mean age of 62 years (SD 12.7, range 23-82), 30.8% were female. Tumors were often multifocal (63.3%) and supratentorial (89.9%). The diagnostic yield was 87.3%. The first-hand radiological diagnosis was correct in 62.0%. A slight decrease in operation time was observed, although not significant. The surgeon contributed to 12% of the variability. Conclusions: Robot-assisted biopsies with Stealth Autoguide™ seem to be comparable, with regards to complications, to frame-based and other frameless neurosurgical biopsies. Learning curves demonstrated no statistical differences in time of surgery and only 12% surgeon-related variation (ie, variation caused by the change of performing surgeon), suggesting a successful implementation of this technical adjunct.

The clinical value of proneural, classical and mesenchymal protein signatures in WHO 2021 adult-type diffuse lower-grade gliomas.

OBJECTIVES: Accumulating evidence shows that mesenchymal transition of glioblastomas is associated with a more aggressive course of disease and therapy resistance. In WHO2021-defined adult-type diffuse gliomas of lower grade (dLGG), the transition of the tumor phenotype over time, has not been studied. Most efforts to correlate proneural, classical or mesenchymal phenotype with outcome in dLGG were made prior to the WHO 2021 classification. Here, we set out to investigate if phenotype predicted survival and tumor recurrence in a clinical cohort of dLGGs, re-classified according to the 2021 WHO criteria. METHODS: Using a TMA-based approach with five immunohistochemical markers (EGFR, p53, MERTK, CD44 and OLIG2), we investigated 183 primary and 49 recurrent tumors derived from patients with previously diagnosed dLGG. Of the 49 relapses, nine tumors recurred a second time, and one a third time. RESULTS: In total, 71.0% of all tumors could be subtyped. Proneural was most dominant in IDH-mut tumors (78.5%), mesenchymal more common among IDH-wt tumors (63.6%). There was a significant difference in survival between classical, proneural and mesenchymal phenotypes in the total cohort (p<0.001), but not after molecular stratification (IDH-mut: p = 0.220, IDH-wt: p = 0.623). Upon recurrence, proneural was retained in 66.7% of the proneural IDH-mut dLGGs (n = 21), whereas IDH-wt tumors (n = 10) mainly retained or gained mesenchymal phenotype. No significant difference in survival was found between IDH-mut gliomas remaining proneural and those shifting to mesenchymal phenotype (p = 0.347). CONCLUSION: Subtyping into classical, proneural and mesenchymal phenotypes by five immunohistochemical markers, was possible for the majority of tumors, but protein signatures did not correlate with patient survival in our WHO2021-stratified cohort. At recurrence, IDH-mut tumors mainly retained proneural, while IDH-wt tumors mostly retained or gained mesenchymal signatures. This phenotypic shift, associated with increased aggressiveness in glioblastoma, did not affect survival. Group sizes were, however, too small to draw any firm conclusions.

Stemness and clinical features in relation to the subventricular zone in diffuse lower-grade glioma: an exploratory study.

Background: The subventricular zone (SVZ) of the human brain is a site of adult stem cell proliferation and a microenvironment for neural stem cells (NSCs). It has been suggested that NSCs in the SVZ are potential cells of origin containing driver mutations of glioblastoma, but their role in the origin of diffuse lower-grade gliomas (dLGGs) is not much studied. Methods: We included 188 patients ≥18 years with IDH-mutated dLGG (WHO grades 2-3) histologically diagnosed between 2007 and 2020. Tissue microarrays of tumor samples for patients between 2007 and 2016 were used for immunodetection of Nestin, SOX2, SOX9, KLF4, NANOG, CD133 cMYC, and Ki67. DNA methylation profile was used for stemness index (mDNAsi). Tumor contact with the SVZ was assessed and the distance was computed. Results: Overall, 70.2% of the dLGG had SVZ contact. Tumors with SVZ contact were larger (102.4 vs 30.9 mL, P < .01), the patients were older (44.3 vs 40.4 years, P = .04) and more often had symptoms related to increased intracranial pressure (31.8% vs 7.1%, P < .01). The expression of SOX2, SOX9, Nestin, and Ki67 showed intersample variability, but no difference was found between tumors with or without SVZ contact, nor with the actual distance to the SVZ. mDNAsi was similar between groups (P = .42). Conclusions: We found no statistical relationship between proximity with the SVZ and mDNAsi or expression of SOX2, SOX9, Nestin, and Ki67 in IDH-mutated dLGG. Our data suggest that the potential impact of SVZ on IDH-mutated dLGG is probably not associated with a more stemness-like tumor profile.

WHO Grade Loses Its Prognostic Value in Molecularly Defined Diffuse Lower-Grade Gliomas.

BACKGROUND: While molecular insights to diffuse lower-grade glioma (dLGG) have improved the basis for prognostication, most established clinical prognostic factors come from the pre-molecular era. For instance, WHO grade as a predictor for survival in dLGG with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation has recently been questioned. We studied the prognostic role of WHO grade in molecularly defined subgroups and evaluated earlier used prognostic factors in the current molecular setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 253 adults with morphological dLGG, consecutively included between 2007 and 2018, were assessed. IDH mutations, codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p/19q, and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) deletions were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no survival benefit for patients with WHO grade 2 over grade 3 IDH-mut dLGG after exclusion of tumors with known CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (n=157) (log-rank p=0.97). This was true also after stratification for oncological postoperative treatment and when astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas were analyzed separately. In IDH-mut astrocytomas, residual tumor volume after surgery was an independent prognostic factor for survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03; p=0.003), but not in oligodendrogliomas (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.03; p=0.15). Preoperative tumor size was an independent predictor in both astrocytomas (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.00-1.05; p=0.02) and oligodendrogliomas (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p=0.01). Age was not a significant prognostic factor in multivariable analyses (astrocytomas p=0.64, oligodendrogliomas p=0.08). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that WHO grade is not a robust prognostic factor in molecularly well-defined dLGG. Preoperative tumor size remained a prognostic factor in both IDH-mut astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas in our cohort, whereas residual tumor volume predicted prognosis in IDH-mut astrocytomas only. The age cutoffs for determining high risk in patients with IDH-mut dLGG from the pre-molecular era are not supported by our results.