Persistence of Sutures and Gastric Reduction After Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: Radiological and Endoscopic Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an effective medium-term procedure for obesity treatment. There are no consistent studies confirming persistence of maintained gastric tubular configuration. We determined sleeve duration, gastric reduction degree, and suture persistence at 12-month follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, single-center study, including patients with obesity undergoing ESG with at least 1-year follow-up, who underwent the following: (1) Barium X-ray study (BS) prior and at 6 months, assessing degree of gastric reduction (severe, moderate, or mild), and (2) gastroscopy at 12 months, accounting the number of persistent sutures (tense, lax, or absent). Secondary outcomes were weight loss data and procedure safety profile. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (30 women), median age of 47.0 [40.0-51.0] years, and average baseline BMI of 37.6 [35.5-41.5] kg/m2 were included. Median %TWL of 17.1% [16.1-22.3%] with TWL > 10% in 94.7% of patients was obtained at 1 year. No major AEs were observed. Six months BS was performed on 30 patients: 12 (40.0%), 14 (46.7%), and 4 (13.3%) patients showed severe, moderate, and mild gastric reduction, respectively. Twelve months gastroscopy was performed on 22 patients with 83.64% of sutures persisting (92 of 110, mean 4.2 of 5.0 sutures/patient) and 70.9% with adequate tension. We found intact sutures in 12 patients (54.5%), and 10 patients (45.5%) had some suture detached (average 1.8, r = 1-3). There were no differences in %TWL according to BS reduction (p = 0.662) or number of persistent sutures (p = 0.678). CONCLUSIONS: ESG is an effective and safe weight loss strategy at 12-month follow-up with persistence of most sutures and maintenance of notable gastric reduction and remodeling.

Ways to perform an endoscopic tattoo. Prospective and randomized study in patients with colorectal neoplasm.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: intraoperative identification of colonic lesions previously detected via colonoscopy may be difficult. Endoscopic tattooing facilitates identification, but there is no evidence regarding which is the best tattoo technique. The goal of the study was to describe the efficacy and safety of endoscopic tattooing and to detect technical and clinical factors associated with its efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: a prospective and randomized study was performed. All tattoo candidate patients were included prior to surgery and randomized into four groups; tattoo at two or three injection points and with a volume of 1 or 1.5 ml of labeling. Multiple variables were registered. RESULTS: one hundred and ninety-five patients were included with an endoscopic tattoo and who subsequently underwent a surgical intervention, the mean age was 70.1 years and 67.2 % were male. The laparoscopic approach was applied in 57.9 % of cases. The intraoperative visibility of the endoscopic tattoo was 89.7 % and 30 % of rectal lesions were not visible. Excluding the rectum, the marking was visible intraoperatively in 92 % of patients, without significant differences according to the surgical approach, the type of marking or any of the variables collected. The tattoo was safe in 92.3 % of the cases. The adverse effect rate was 7.7 % and none of the complications were clinically significant. There were no significant differences between any variables collected in relation to adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: endoscopic colon tattoo is safe and effective regardless of the technique used. We recommend the technique of two injection points and 1 ml of marking volume for its simplicity, efficiency and safety.

Improved high-quality colon cleansing with 1L NER1006 versus 2L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate or oral sulfate solution.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopy requires bowel cleansing for gut mucosa visualization; high-quality cleansing facilitates lesion detection. NER1006 is a 1L polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation. This post hoc analysis of two randomized trials investigated cleansing efficacy assessed, as in clinical practice, by site endoscopists. METHODS: Patients received NER1006, 2L PEG + ascorbate (2LPEG), or oral sulfate solution (OSS) as a 2-day evening/morning regimen (N2D) or NER1006 morning-only dosing (N1D). Treatment-blinded site endoscopists assessed cleansing using the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS). Analyses were conducted in a modified full analysis set, including (mFAS; n = 1378) or excluding (mFAS2; n = 1319) imputed failures, and in patients with 100% treatment adherence (mFAS100; n = 1047). Overall cleansing success (HCS grade A/B), overall high-quality cleansing (HCS grade A), and high-quality segments (HCS 3-4) per treatment population were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall cleansing success was higher with N2D than 2LPEG (92.7-97.5% vs. 87.9-93.0%), and more patients had overall high-quality cleansing with N2D and N1D than 2LPEG (68.0-72.1% and 64.0-68.4% vs. 50.7-56.0%). Without imputed failures, N2D delivered more overall high-quality cleansing than OSS (74.5-77.3% vs. 67.8-69.8%). More high-quality segments were demonstrated with N2D and N1D versus 2 LPEG (82.5-87.1% and 79.4-84.4% vs. 70.4-76.3%) and with N2D versus OSS (82.7-89.5% vs. 78.1-84.4%). CONCLUSION: When assessed by site endoscopists, NER1006 delivers greater high-quality cleansing than 2LPEG or OSS.

Factores pronósticos asociados a la mortalidad de los pacientes con hepatitis alcohólica grave / Prognostic factors associated with mortality in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis

La hepatitis alcohólica grave se asocia a una mortalidad precoz elevada. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue identificar los factores pronósticos asociados a la mortalidad intrahospitalaria, la mortalidad a medio y a largo plazo de la hepatitis alcohólica grave, así como evaluar los diferentes índices pronósticos en una cohorte de pacientes de nuestro hospital. Realizamos un análisis de 66 episodios consecutivos que ingresaron durante el periodo 2000-2008. Se recogieron y analizaron los datos clínicos y analíticos al ingreso, a la semana, al mes, a los 6 meses y al año, así como datos sobre el tratamiento recibido y las complicaciones asociadas durante el ingreso. Se calcularon y evaluaron los diferentes índices pronósticos de la literatura. La mortalidad asociada a un episodio de hepatitis alcohólica grave se produjo sobre todo durante el primer mes, con una tasa media de mortalidad del 16,9 %. Las complicaciones infecciosas se relacionaron con una menor supervivencia intrahospitalaria. Los valores de MELD, urea y bilirrubina a los 7 días de ingreso fueron los únicos factores independientes de supervivencia intrahospitalaria (OR = 1,14; 1,012 y 1,1, respectivamente) y a los 6 meses (OR = 1,15; 1,014 y 1,016, respectivamente). A los 12 meses, solo los valores de MELD y urea a los 7 días fueron factores independientes de supervivencia. En nuestra cohorte el MELD fue el mejor índice pronóstico para predecir la mortalidad asociada a un episodio de hepatitis alcohólica grave (AU)

Severe alcoholic hepatitis is associated with high early mortality. This study aimed at identifying prognostic factors associated with in-hospital, medium- and long-term mortality of severe alcoholic hepatitis and to evaluate the different prognostic scoring systems on a cohort of patients in our hospital. To this end, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 66 episodes admitted between 2000 and 2008. Clinical and laboratory data on admission, at 7 days, 1 month, 6 months, and after one year were collected and analyzed, as were the details on the treatment and complications that occurred during hospitalization; the different prognostic indices used in the literature were calculated. Death event associated with an episode of severe alcoholic hepatitis occurs primarily during the first month, with an average mortality rate of 16.9. Infectious complications were associated with lower in-hospital survival. MELD score, urea and bilirubin values one week after admission were independently associated with both in-hospital survival (OR = 1.14, 1.012 and 1.1, respectively), and survival at 6 months (OR = 1, 15; 1.014 and 1.016, respectively). Only MELD score and urea values at 7 days were independent predictors of survival twelve months after the acute hepatitis episode. MELD score, urea, and bilirubin 7 days after admission were the only independent in-hospital survival and also long-term survival factors 6 months and one year after the episode. In our cohort, the MELD score was the best prognostic index to predict mortality associated with an episode of severe alcoholic hepatitis (AU)

[Prognostic factors associated with mortality in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis]. / Factores pronósticos asociados a la mortalidad de los pacientes con hepatitis alcohólica grave.

Severe alcoholic hepatitis is associated with high early mortality. This study aimed at identifying prognostic factors associated with in-hospital, medium- and long-term mortality of severe alcoholic hepatitis and to evaluate the different prognostic scoring systems on a cohort of patients in our hospital. To this end, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 66 episodes admitted between 2000 and 2008. Clinical and laboratory data on admission, at 7 days, 1 month, 6 months, and after one year were collected and analyzed, as were the details on the treatment and complications that occurred during hospitalization; the different prognostic indices used in the literature were calculated. Death event associated with an episode of severe alcoholic hepatitis occurs primarily during the first month, with an average mortality rate of 16.9. Infectious complications were associated with lower in-hospital survival. MELD score, urea and bilirubin values one week after admission were independently associated with both in-hospital survival (OR = 1.14, 1.012 and 1.1, respectively), and survival at 6 months (OR = 1, 15; 1.014 and 1.016, respectively). Only MELD score and urea values at 7 days were independent predictors of survival twelve months after the acute hepatitis episode. MELD score, urea, and bilirubin 7 days after admission were the only independent in-hospital survival and also long-term survival factors 6 months and one year after the episode. In our cohort, the MELD score was the best prognostic index to predict mortality associated with an episode of severe alcoholic hepatitis.