Drug use and receipt of highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected persons in two U.S. clinic cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: Drug use and receipt of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were assessed in HIV-infected persons from the Comprehensive Care Center (CCC; Nashville, TN) and Johns Hopkins University HIV Clinic (JHU; Baltimore, MD) between 1999 and 2005. METHODS: Participants with and without injection drug use (IDU) history in the CCC and JHU cohorts were evaluated. Additional analysis of persons with history of IDU, non-injection drug use (NIDU), and no drug use from CCC were performed. Activity of IDU and NIDU also was assessed for the CCC cohort. HAART use and time on HAART were analyzed according to drug use category and site of care. RESULTS: 1745 persons were included from CCC: 268 (15%) with IDU history and 796 (46%) with NIDU history. 1977 persons were included from JHU: 731 (35%) with IDU history. Overall, the cohorts differed in IDU risk factor rates, age, race, sex, and time in follow-up. In multivariate analyses, IDU was associated with decreased HAART receipt overall (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: [0.45-0.84] and OR = 0.58, 95% CI: [0.46-0.73], respectively for CCC and JHU) and less time on HAART at JHU (0.70, [0.55-0.88]), but not statistically associated with time on HAART at CCC (0.78, [0.56-1.09]). NIDU was independently associated with decreased HAART receipt (0.62, [0.47-0.81]) and less time on HAART (0.66, [0.52-0.85]) at CCC. These associations were not altered significantly whether patients at CCC were categorized according to historical drug use or drug use during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with IDU history from both clinic populations were less likely to receive HAART and tended to have less cumulative time on HAART. Effects of NIDU were similar to IDU at CCC. NIDU without IDU is an important contributor to HAART utilization.

Antiretroviral therapy initiation before, during, or after pregnancy in HIV-1-infected women: maternal virologic, immunologic, and clinical response.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy has been associated with a decreased risk of HIV disease progression in the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era. The effect of timing of HAART initiation relative to pregnancy on maternal virologic, immunologic and clinical outcomes has not been assessed. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 1997-2005 among 112 pregnant HIV-infected women who started HAART before (N = 12), during (N = 70) or after pregnancy (N = 30). RESULTS: Women initiating HAART before pregnancy had lower CD4+ nadir and higher baseline HIV-1 RNA. Women initiating HAART after pregnancy were more likely to receive triple-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Multivariable analyses adjusted for baseline CD4+ lymphocytes, baseline HIV-1 RNA, age, race, CD4+ lymphocyte count nadir, history of ADE, prior use of non-HAART ART, type of HAART regimen, prior pregnancies, and date of HAART start. In these models, women initiating HAART during pregnancy had better 6-month HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ changes than those initiating HAART after pregnancy (-0.35 vs. 0.10 log(10) copies/mL, P = 0.03 and 183.8 vs. -70.8 cells/mm(3), P = 0.03, respectively) but similar to those initiating HAART before pregnancy (-0.32 log(10) copies/mL, P = 0.96 and 155.8 cells/mm(3), P = 0.81, respectively). There were 3 (25%) AIDS-defining events or deaths in women initiating HAART before pregnancy, 3 (4%) in those initiating HAART during pregnancy, and 5 (17%) in those initiating after pregnancy (P = 0.01). There were no statistical differences in rates of HIV disease progression between groups. CONCLUSIONS: HAART initiation during pregnancy was associated with better immunologic and virologic responses than initiation after pregnancy.

Pregnancy and HIV disease progression during the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Before the availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), there was no clear effect of pregnancy on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease progression. This has not been assessed during the HAART era. METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study among HIV-infected women with >or=1 outpatient clinic visit between January 1997 and December 2004. HIV disease progression was defined as the occurrence of an AIDS-defining event or death. RESULTS: Of 759 women who met the inclusion criteria, 139 (18%) had had >1 pregnancy, and 540 (71%) had received HAART. There was no difference in HAART duration by pregnancy status. Eleven pregnant (8%) and 149 nonpregnant (24%) women progressed to AIDS or death. After controlling for age, baseline CD4(+) lymphocyte count, baseline HIV-1 RNA level, and durable virologic suppression in a Cox proportional hazards model that included propensity score for pregnancy, pregnancy was associated with a decreased risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.20-0.79]; P=.009]). In a matched-pair analysis of 81 pregnant women matched to 81 nonpregnant women according to age, baseline CD4(+) lymphocyte count, receipt of HAART, and date of cohort entry, pregnant women had a lower risk of disease progression both before (HR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.01-0.89]; P=.04) and after (HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.19-1.00]; P=.05) the pregnancy event. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of HIV disease progression in this HAART-era study. This finding could be the result of the healthier immune status of women who become pregnant or could possibly be related to a beneficial interaction between pregnancy and HAART.

Absolute count and percentage of CD4+ lymphocytes are independent predictors of disease progression in HIV-infected persons initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is recommended when the absolute CD4(+) T lymphocyte count is <200 cells/mm(3), and it should be considered when that count is > or =200, although the optimal timing when it is > or =200 is unclear. Because preliminary data had suggested that a low CD4(+) T lymphocyte percentage (%CD4) is associated with disease progression in persons initiating HAART who have a higher absolute CD4, we sought to further characterize the predictive utility of %CD4. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of persons in Collaborations in HIV Outcomes Research/US cohort who initiated their first HAART regimen between 1997 and 2004, received > or =30 days of therapy, and had baseline values of absolute CD4, %CD4, and HIV-1 RNA. Cox proportional-hazards models determined associations between %CD4 and disease progression (to either a new AIDS-defining event [ADE] or death). RESULTS: Of 1891 persons, 11% were female and 18% were African American; the median age was 38 years. Median follow-up was 55 months (interquartile range, 23-83 months), and 468 (25%) had disease progression. Multivariable analysis including age, race, sex, HIV-1 RNA, prior antiretroviral therapy, probable route of infection, prior ADE, absolute CD4, and %CD4 was performed; prior ART (P<.0001), injection-drug use (P=.04), lower absolute CD4 (P=.002), and lower %CD4 (P=.002) predicted disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: %CD4 at initiation of the first HAART regimen predicted disease progression independent of absolute CD4; %CD4 may be used to determine the timing of HAART.

CD4 lymphocyte percentage predicts disease progression in HIV-infected patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy with CD4 lymphocyte counts >350 lymphocytes/mm3.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with > or = 200 absolute CD4 lymphocytes/mm3 is unknown. CD4 lymphocyte percentage could add prognostic information. METHODS: Persons who initiated HAART between 1 January 1998 and 1 January 2003, received > or = 30 days of therapy, and had baseline CD4 lymphocyte data available were included in the study. The log-rank test for time to event and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine predictors of a new acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining illness or death. RESULTS: A total of 788 patients met the inclusion criteria. At baseline, subjects had a median of 225 CD4 lymphocytes/mm3 and 17% CD4 lymphocytes. Subjects with < 17% CD4 lymphocytes had earlier disease progression, compared with subjects with > or = 17%, both in the entire cohort (P<.0001) and of those subjects with > 350 absolute CD4 lymphocytes/mm3 at baseline (P=.03). CD4 lymphocyte percentage < 17% was the strongest predictor of disease progression among subjects in this latter group (hazard ratio, 3.57; P=.045). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, CD4 lymphocyte percentage predicted disease progression in HIV-infected subjects who initiated therapy with > 350 CD4 lymphocytes/mm3. This information may help identify persons who will derive the greatest benefit from initiation of HAART.