Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 45(3): E127-31, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26991579

RESUMO

Accurate assessment of partial-thickness flexor tendon lacerations in the hand is difficult owing to the subjectivity of evaluation. In this study, we created 12 partial-thickness flexor tendon lacerations in a cadaveric hand, evaluated the accuracy of 6 orthopedic residents and 4 fellowship-trained hand surgeons in estimating the percentage thickness of each laceration, and assessed the groups' interobserver and intraobserver agreement. The 10 participants estimated each laceration independently and on 2 separate occasions and indicated whether they would repair it. The actual thickness of each laceration was calculated from measurements made with a pair of digital microcalipers. Overall estimates differed significantly from calibrated measurements. Estimates grouped by residents and fellowship-trained hand surgeons also differed significantly. Third-year residents were the most accurate residents, and fellowship-trained hand surgeons were more accurate than residents. Overall interobserver agreement was poor for both readings. There was moderate overall intraobserver agreement. Fellowship-trained hand surgeons and first-year residents had the highest intraobserver agreement. These results highlight the difficulty in accurately assessing flexor tendon lacerations. Accuracy appears not to improve with surgeon experience.


Assuntos
Traumatismos da Mão/diagnóstico , Traumatismos dos Tendões/diagnóstico , Cadáver , Bolsas de Estudo , Traumatismos da Mão/cirurgia , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Lacerações/diagnóstico , Lacerações/cirurgia , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Ortopedia/educação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Traumatismos dos Tendões/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...