Incisional Infections after Renal Transplant: Outcome Data From 238 Consecutive Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical incision infections, along with urinary tract infections, are among the most common infective complications after kidney transplant. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the incidence and predisposing factors of surgical incision infection development in renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2015, there were 238 consecutive kidney transplant procedures performed in our unit. Of these, 146 patients received deceased donor kidney allografts and 92 had transplants from living related donors. Deceased donor data, data about surgical procedures, and recipient data were collected. RESULTS: This study demonstrated a surgical incision infection rate of 7.56%. Predisposing factors were found to be kidneys from deceased donors, antithymocyte globulin as antirejection therapy, body mass index > 30 kg/m2, cold ischemia time > 16.3 hours, delayed graft function, postoperative serum glucose > 280 mg/dL, second kidney transplant, and BK virus infection. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical incision infection is a common postoperative infection after kidney transplant. The findings of this study elucidated the potential role of specific risk factors in surgical incision infection development (increased cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, antithymocyte globulin administration). Further evaluation of these findings in a prospective study is needed to avoid potential bias.

Intestinal Perforation in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Experience of 2123 Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Intestinal perforation remains a clinical challenge and potentially lethal complication in renal transplant recipients. Immunosuppression not only places the patient at risk for intestinal perforation but also masks classic clinical symptoms and signs of acute abdominal pain, leading to delayed diagnosis and proper treatment. The aim of our study is to present the experience of our center on the treatment of intestinal perforation in renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study reported 11 patients (0.52%) with intestinal perforation among a group of 2123 patients who received renal transplants in the Transplantation Unit at Laikon General Hospital in Athens, Greece from 1983 to August 2015. RESULTS: One patient died from septic shock before any surgery, and 3 patients died during the early postoperative period, resulting in a morality rate of 36.3%. All patients who died had a functioning graft. From the patients who were discharged, the mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 4-32 months). CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal perforation after renal transplant is a major and potentially lethal complication. Clinical presentation is usually equivocal, and the transplant surgeon should be highly suspicious when treating a renal transplant recipient with acute abdominal pain, even in cases without other predisposing factors (diverticulitis, ischemic colitis, and so forth), so that this condition could be investigated and unmasked.

Impact of donor and recipient age difference on long-term allograft survival after living donor renal transplantation: analysis of 478 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Either deceased or living-related renal transplantation constitutes the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage renal disease. In this retrospective study, an attempt to identify parameters that affect allograft survival in living donor renal transplantation was made. METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2012, 478 adult patients received a renal transplant from a living-related donor in our center and their records were retrospectively reviewed in November 2012. Data concerning donor age, recipient age, donor/recipient age difference, donor/recipient gender, and ABO compatibility/incompatibility were recorded and associated with renal allograft survival rate. RESULTS: Renal allograft survival rate was 96%, 89.5%, and 77.7% in the first, fifth, and 10th yr after transplantation, respectively. Only the difference between donor and recipient age was statistically significant in relation to graft survival. In cases with age difference >13 yr, graft survival rate was lower from the third yr onward. CONCLUSIONS: Only the age difference between donor and recipient exerts an adverse impact on graft outcome after living donor renal transplantation, whereas donor age, recipient age, donor/recipient gender, and ABO incompatibility do not significantly influence renal allograft survival.