Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 14(5): e24736, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35677013

RESUMO

Background Recent studies showed that a significant percentage of people who recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had lingering symptoms. Among patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection, studies showed persistent symptoms both in patients hospitalized and in outpatient settings. In the studies done in the outpatient setting involving mild to moderate COVID-19 patients, there were significant variations regarding the exact percentage of people with lingering symptoms. Also, in the outpatient setting, not many studies were done on COVID-19 patients that assessed risk factors for having lingering symptoms. Given that a large percentage of people infected with COVID-19 infection do not get hospitalized, it is imperative that this lacuna be filled. We believe knowing the details of long-term symptoms of COVID-19 infection both from prevalence and predictors point of view, could allow the physicians, healthcare system and community to better prepare for managing and following these patients. Materials and methods Our study period was within 12 months after the first documented case of COVID-19 occurred in the State of Alabama. Our study population included patients who were diagnosed with a documented case of COVID-19 in this time period and were under the care of a single primary care provider at an ambulatory clinic. Among 80 patients who had documented COVID-19, three left the practice, two declined to participate in the study and three were deceased (two due to COVID-19 and one for other reasons). Therefore, the study population constituted 72 patients. A questionnaire was mailed to all 72 patients to see how many of them had symptoms three months and beyond of having COVID-19 infection. A chart review was conducted for the study participants to assess for "Comorbid conditions", health conditions that were considered conclusively high risk for acute COVID-19 infection by US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Results Fifty-three patients responded to the questionnaire; 27 patients (50.9%) reported lingering symptoms beyond three months of diagnosis with COVID-19 infection. The three most common symptoms reported were fatigue (56%), brain fog (48%), and shortness of breath (41%). The results also showed that women are more likely than men to have lingering symptoms. "Elderly" (≥65 years) patients were as likely as 18-64 years old patients to have lingering symptoms and the presence of one or more of the "Comorbid conditions" does not have any bearing on the occurrence of lingering symptoms. Conclusion Future studies should be done in a larger population to assess the findings that our study showed regarding "elderly" age and the presence of one or more "comorbid conditions" being independent variables of the occurrence of prolonged COVID-19 symptoms. We recommend studies be done assessing the prevalence and predictors for the long-term effects of the COVID-19 infection. This knowledge could help in preventing those long-term symptoms from occurring in the first place and also in preparing the patient, the physician and the community in managing the outcomes effectively.

2.
COPD ; 4(1): 23-8, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17364674

RESUMO

While depression is a common co-morbid condition among patients with COPD, little is known about predictors or health impact of depression among these patients. To address these gaps in knowledge we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 207 patients with COPD cared for in a network of primary care clinics affiliated with an urban academic health center. A standardized questionnaire was used to measure demographic characteristics, smoking status, co-morbid medical conditions, current medications, self-efficacy, social support, illness intrusiveness, and self-reported health care utilization during the previous 6 months. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale. Overall, the prevalence of moderate to high levels of depressive symptoms was 60.4%. In a multivariate analysis independent predictors of depressive symptoms were being a former smoker (OR = 0.41 (95% CI 0.19-0.89)), higher self-efficacy (OR = 0.42 (0.28-0.64)), higher social support (OR = 0.72 (0.52-0.99)), and higher perceived illness intrusiveness (OR = 1.05 (1.02-1.08)). Depressive symptoms were associated with increased physician visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations for lung disease. In conclusion, depressive symptoms are common among patients with COPD and associated with an increase in healthcare utilization. These findings suggest that the identification of risk factors for depressive symptoms (e.g., continued smoking) may increase detection and improve management of depression and health outcomes among patients with COPD.


Assuntos
Depressão/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/psicologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Análise de Regressão , Autoeficácia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Apoio Social , Espirometria , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Chest ; 128(4): 2017-24, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16236850

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Whereas pulmonary rehabilitation reduces symptoms and improves the quality of life of patients with COPD and is recommended in management guidelines, few patients have access to rehabilitation services. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of increasing access to selected components of pulmonary rehabilitation by providing nurse-assisted home care that was composed of patient education, efforts to improve patient self-management skills, and enhanced follow-up. DESIGN: We conducted a 6-month, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care clinics associated with an urban academic health system. PATIENTS: Patients were > or = 45 years of age with a physician diagnosis of COPD, and had a > or = 20-pack-year smoking history, had experienced at least one respiratory symptom during the past 12 months, and had airflow obstruction (ie, FEV1/FVC ratio, < 70%; FEV1, < 80%). INTERVENTIONS: Four nurses were trained in the use of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines, and two of the four nurses received additional training in collaborative management. Patients were randomly assigned to usual care (UC), nurse-assisted medical management (MM), or nurse-assisted collaborative management (CM). MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measures were of generic (Medical Outcome Study 36-item short form [SF-36], illness intrusiveness) and disease-specific (St. George's respiratory questionnaire [SGRQ]) quality of life and self-reported health-care utilization. RESULTS: Overall, 151 patients (UC group, 51 patients; MM group, 49 patients; and CM group, 51 patients) completed the study, their average age was 69 years, and 56.9% were women. The average change in the SF-36 general health domain for the MM group vs the UC group was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], -7.9 to 11.2), and for the CM group vs the UC group the average change was 2.5 (95% CI, -7.0 to 12.3). The corresponding changes in SGRQ total domain were -2.9 (95% CI, -9.8 to 4.1) and -2.6 (95% CI, -9.5 to 4.3). There was no change in the number of self-reported emergency department visits or hospitalizations, but the utilization of these services was infrequent. CONCLUSION: The findings of our investigation and those from the published literature suggest that interventions to enhance patient education, self-management skills, and follow-up among patients with COPD do not result in clinically meaningful improvements in health status or self-reported health-care utilization. Moreover, future studies of disease management programs for patients with COPD need to evaluate interventions that address associated comorbidities, exercise, and social support.


Assuntos
Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/enfermagem , Enfermagem em Reabilitação , Idoso , Enfermagem em Saúde Comunitária , Comorbidade , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Civil , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/reabilitação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Autocuidado , Fumar/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...