Health literacy assessment and patient satisfaction in surgical practice.

BACKGROUND: Limited health literacy has been associated with poorer health outcomes and increased morbidity and mortality. Though caring for surgical patients requires communication about complex topics, there is limited literature on health literacy competency in this population. The objective of this study was to assess health literacy in an adult surgical outpatient clinic population, to explore potential determinants of adequate health literacy, and to assess patient satisfaction with physician-patient communication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed and anonymous data including health literacy, demographics, and patient satisfaction with provider communication were collected. The study population included adult patients who visited an outpatient surgical practice over a one-month period. Health literacy was assessed using the Newest Vital Sign while the satisfaction questions came from the Outpatient Satisfaction Survey (Press-Ganey Associates, Chicago, IL). RESULTS: 148 patients participated in the study. The mean age was 49 years, 41% of those who gender identified were male, and 76% were White/Caucasian. 34 (27%) of those who answered the question had received a four-year undergraduate/university degree. 55 (37%) of the patients were identified as having low health literacy. More years of education was significantly associated with adequate health literacy and those patients who were more educated and had adequate health literacy were more satisfied with provider communication. CONCLUSION: Patients on average were highly satisfied with provider communication in this outpatient surgical clinic. Higher education levels were associated with better health literacy and patients with both characteristics were more satisfied with provider communication.

What are the associations between the quantity of faculty evaluations and residents' perception of quality feedback?

OBJECTIVES: To determine if there is a correlation between the numbers of evaluations submitted by faculty and the perception of the quality of feedback reported by trainees on a yearly survey. METHOD: 147 ACGME-accredited training programs sponsored by a single medical school were included in the analysis. Eighty-seven programs (49 core residency programs and 38 advanced training programs) with 4 or more trainees received ACGME survey summary data for academic year 2013-2014. Resident ratings of satisfaction with feedback were analyzed against the number of evaluations completed per resident during the same period. R-squared correlation analysis was calculated using a Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: 177,096 evaluations were distributed to the 87 programs, of which 117,452 were completed (66%). On average, faculty submitted 33.9 evaluations per resident. Core residency programs had a greater number of evaluations per resident than fellowship programs (39.2 vs. 27.1, respectively, p = 0.15). The average score for the "satisfied with feedback after assignment" survey questions was 4.2 (range 2.2-5.0). There was no overall correlation between the number of evaluations per resident and the residents' perception of feedback from faculty based on medical, surgical or hospital-based programs. CONCLUSIONS: Resident perception of feedback is not correlated with number of faculty evaluations. An emphasis on faculty summative evaluation of resident performance is important but appears to miss the mark as a replacement for on-going, data-driven, structured resident feedback. Understanding the difference between evaluation and feedback is a global concept that is important for all medical educators and learners.

Cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities in patients with syphilis: association with clinical and laboratory features.

OBJECTIVE: To define clinical and laboratory features that identify patients with neurosyphilis. METHODS: Subjects (n=326) with syphilis but no previous neurosyphilis who met 1993 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for lumbar puncture underwent standardized history, neurological examination, venipuncture, and lumbar puncture. Neurosyphilis was defined as a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell count >20 cells/ microL or reactive CSF Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test result. RESULTS: Sixty-five subjects (20.1%) had neurosyphilis. Early syphilis increased the odds of neurosyphilis in univariate but not multivariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, serum rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer > or =1 : 32 increased the odds of neurosyphilis 10.85-fold in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-uninfected subjects and 5.98-fold in HIV-infected subjects. A peripheral blood CD4+ T cell count < or =350 cells/ microL conferred 3.10-fold increased odds of neurosyphilis in HIV-infected subjects. Similar results were obtained when neurosyphilis was more stringently defined as a reactive CSF VDRL test result. CONCLUSION: Serum RPR titer helps predict the likelihood of neurosyphilis. HIV-induced immune impairment may increase the risk of neurosyphilis.