Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
ACG Case Rep J ; 10(12): e01225, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38093784

RESUMO

Hyperammonemia in adults is most often due to cirrhosis. Ammonia is metabolized through the urea cycle. With liver disease, this pathway is altered, and urea is unable to be formed, creating a buildup of ammonia with numerous side effects, including encephalopathy. A less common presentation is hyperammonemia in the absence of liver disease. We present a rare case of non-cirrhotic hyperammonemia due to a splenogonadal shunt.

3.
J Med Case Rep ; 17(1): 245, 2023 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37316887

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the 1990s, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) were performed using bare metal stents, and stent-induced hemolysis was a complication noted in 10% of patients. This was due to the mechanical stress created by turbulent flow from the uncovered interstices. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) stents came into regular use in the early 2000s becoming the standard equipment for TIPS placements, which are predominately covered. Due to this, stent-induced hemolysis has become a rare phenomenon. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a case of TIPS-induced hemolysis in a 53-years-old Caucasian female patient without cirrhosis. The patient had a history of heterozygous factor 5 Leiden mutation and abnormal lupus anticoagulant profile with development of a portal vein thrombus. She had undergone previous TIPS placement complicated by a TIPS thrombosis 3 years after initial placement requiring venoplasty and extension of the stent. Within one month, the patient developed hemolytic anemia with extensive evaluation that did not yield an alternative cause. Due to temporal association and clinical symptoms, the hemolytic anemia was attributed to the recent TIPS revision. CONCLUSION: This particular case of TIPS-induced hemolysis in a patient who does not have cirrhosis has not been previously described in the literature. Our case highlights that TIPS-induced hemolysis should be considered in anyone who could have potential underlying red blood cell dysfunction, not just those with cirrhosis. Further, the case demonstrates an important point that mild hemolysis (i.e., not requiring blood transfusion) can likely be managed conservatively, without stent removal.


Assuntos
Síndrome Antifosfolipídica , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hemólise , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática/efeitos adversos , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Veia Porta
6.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 22(9): 47, 2020 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32671616

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continue to expand, the opportunity for hepatotoxicity remains a clinical concern. This review looks to update the current literature on drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and liver-related complications from current and emerging treatments for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). RECENT FINDINGS: An extensive literature review on currently used medications to treat IBD and their liver-related side effects that includes mesalamine, thiopurines, certain antibiotics, methotrexate, anti-TNF agents including recently introduced biosimilars, anti-integrin therapy, anti-IL 12/IL 23 therapy, and small molecule JAK inhibitors. Hepatotoxicity remains an important clinical issue when managing patients with IBD. Clinicians need to remain aware of the potential for liver-related adverse events with various medication classes and adjust their clinical monitoring as appropriate based on the agents being used.


Assuntos
Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/etiologia , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/efeitos adversos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Humanos
7.
Dig Dis Sci ; 64(9): 2614-2621, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31152331

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have demonstrated that the protective effect of colonoscopy against colorectal cancer is lower in the proximal colon. Proximal serrated polyps, including sessile serrated adenomas and proximal hyperplastic polyps, can be frequently missed and pose a risk of interval cancers. AIM: To investigate the overall adenoma detection rate (ADR) and the proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR) among academic gastroenterologists, community gastroenterologists, and colorectal surgeons from a single institution, all of whom have received formal training in colonoscopy during their fellowship. METHODS: All complete screening colonoscopies for patients aged 50 or older with a good to excellent bowel preparation performed by different endoscopists at Medstar Washington Hospital Center (Washington, DC) from July 2015 to December 2017 were reviewed. Pathology reports of the resected polyps were manually reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 2850 screening colonoscopies meeting the inclusion criteria were performed by 18 endoscopists (6 academic, 7 community, and 5 colorectal surgeons). There was no significant difference in the mean ADR among the three groups of endoscopists: academic gastroenterologists, community gastroenterologists, and colorectal surgeons (40.3% vs 36.0% vs 39.6%, respectively). However, academic gastroenterologists had a significantly higher PSPDR compared to community gastroenterologists or colorectal surgeons (12.3% vs 5.4% vs 4.5%, respectively, ANOVA p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Our novel data show that academic gastroenterologists had a significantly higher PSPDR compared to community gastroenterologists or colorectal surgeons despite a comparable overall ADR among the three groups. PSPDR may be considered as an important quality indicator for colonoscopy, apart from ADR.


Assuntos
Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Colonoscopia , Cirurgia Colorretal/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastroenterologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adenoma/patologia , Colo Ascendente , Colo Transverso , Pólipos do Colo/patologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centros de Atenção Terciária
8.
Drug Saf ; 42(3): 365-387, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30343418

RESUMO

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), herbal-induced liver injury, and herbal and dietary supplement (HDS)-induced liver injury are an important aspect of drug safety. Knowledge regarding responsible drugs, mechanisms, risk factors, and the diagnostic tools to detect liver injury have continued to grow in the past year. This review highlights what we considered the most significant publications from among more than 1800 articles relating to liver injury from medications, herbal products, and dietary supplements in 2017 and 2018. The US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study highlighted several areas of ongoing study, including the potential utility of human leukocyte antigens and microRNAs as DILI risk factors and new data on racial differences, the role of alcohol consumption, factors associated with prognosis, and updates on the clinical signatures of autoimmune DILI, thiopurines, and HDS agents. Novel data were also generated from the Spanish and Latin American DILI registries as well as from Chinese and Korean case series. A few new agents causing DILI were added to the growing list in the past 2 years, including sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, as were new aspects of chemotherapy-associated liver injury. A number of cases reported previously described hepatotoxins confirmed via the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM; e.g., norethisterone, methylprednisolone, glatiramer acetate) and/or the DILIN method (e.g., celecoxib, dimethyl fumarate). Additionally, much work centered on elucidating the pathophysiology of DILI, including the importance of bile salt export pumps and immune-mediated mechanisms. Finally, it must be noted that, while hundreds of new studies described DILI in 2017-2018, the quality of such reports must always be addressed. Björnsson reminds us to remain very critical of the data when addressing the future utility of a study, which is why it is so important to adhere to a standardized method such as RUCAM when determining DILI causality. While drug-induced hepatotoxicity remains a diagnosis of exclusion, the diverse array of publications that appeared in 2017 and 2018 provided important advances in our understanding of DILI, paving the way for our improved ability to make a more definitive diagnosis and risk assessment.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos/tendências , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/epidemiologia , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/etiologia , Humanos , Medição de Risco
9.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 12(10): 1033-1043, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30111182

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains an increasingly recognized cause of hepatotoxicity and liver failure worldwide. In 2017, we continued to learn about predicting, diagnosing, and prognosticating drug hepatotoxicity. Areas covered: In this review, we selected from over 1200 articles from 2017 to synopsize updates in DILI. There were new HLA haplotypes associated with medications including HLA-C0401 and HLA-B*14. There has been continued work with quantitative systems pharmacology, particularly with the DILIsym® initiative, which employs mathematical representations of DILI mechanisms to predict hepatotoxicity in simulated populations. Additionally, knowledge regarding microRNAs (miRNAs) continues to expand. Some new miRNAs this past year include miRNA-223 and miRNA-605. Aside from miRNAs, other biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and even prediction of DILI were explored. Studies on K18, OPN, and MCSFR have correlated DILI and liver-associated death within 6 months. Conversely, a new prognostic panel using apolipoportein-A1 and haptoglobin has been proposed to predict recovery. Further study of CDH5 has also provided researchers a possible new biomarker for prediction and susceptibility to DILI. Expert commentary: Although research on DILI remains quite promising, there is yet to be a reliable, simple method to predict, diagnose, and risk assess this form of hepatotoxicity.


Assuntos
Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/diagnóstico , Antígenos HLA , MicroRNAs/sangue , Algoritmos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biomarcadores/urina , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/genética , Simulação por Computador , Humanos , Imagem Óptica , Ácido Peroxinitroso/metabolismo , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...