The clinical and economic burden after an osteoporosis fracture in France: a nationwide population-based study.

Osteoporosis-related fragility fractures increase the risk of subsequent fractures and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Emphasis should be placed on the prevention of recurrent fractures, which will decrease both the clinical burden on patients and the economic burden on the health system. INTRODUCTION: Fragility fractures are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Quantifying the clinical and economic burden of subsequent fractures following an initial osteoporosis-related fracture is a key to informing public health policies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, using the national French health insurance claims database. Males and females ≥ 50 years, with a hospital discharge diagnosis of osteoporosis with fracture or a relevant fragility fracture (hip, vertebrae, femur, pelvis, wrist/hand, forearm, humerus/clavicle) between 2011 and 2014, were included and followed until death or end of 2016, whichever came first. Index fracture was the first qualifying hospitalization; subsequent fractures were defined as those occurring either at a different site from the index fracture or at the same site ≥ 90 days apart. Costs abstracted included hospitalization, external consultation, outpatient visits, and treatment. RESULTS: A total of 544,426 participants (132,148 [24.3%] males and 412,278 [75.7%] females), of whom 16,110 (12.2%) males and 73,538 (17.8%) females had at least one subsequent fracture during follow-up, were included. Incidence of subsequent fracture was highest in the first year following index fracture. During follow-up, 161,179 patients died; mortality was highest among those with a hip fracture at index (29,971 (51.6%) males and 65,254 (39.6%) females). Total mean costs per patient in the year following index fracture were highest for males and females with a hip fracture (€18,585 and €15,754, respectively). CONCLUSION: Subsequent fractures among osteoporotic participants with an initial fracture result in increased clinical mortality and high healthcare resource use. Emphasis should be placed on the prevention of recurrent fractures.

Income of living kidney donors and the income difference between living kidney donors and their recipients in the United States.

Disincentives for living kidney donation are common but are poorly understood. We studied 54 483 living donor kidney transplants in the United States between 2000 and 2009, limiting to those with valid zip code data to allow determination of median household income by linkage to the 2000 U.S. Census. We then determined the income and income difference of donors and recipients. The median household income in donors and recipients was $46 334 ±$17 350 and $46 439 ±$17 743, respectively. Donation-related expenses consume ≥ 1 month's income in 76% of donors. The mean ± standard deviation income difference between recipients and donors in transplants involving a wealthier recipient was $22 760 ± 14 792 and in 90% of transplants the difference was <$40 000 dollars. The findings suggest that the capacity for donors to absorb the financial consequences of donation, or of recipients to reimburse allowable expenses, is limited. There were few transplants with a large difference in recipient and donor income, suggesting that the scope and value of any payment between donors and recipients is likely to be small. We conclude that most donors and recipients have similar modest incomes, suggesting that the costs of donation are a significant burden in the majority of living donor transplants.

A description of the costs of living and standard criteria deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and survival and is associated with lower health care costs compared with dialysis. We described and compared the costs of living and standard criteria for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Patients included adult recipients of a first kidney-only transplant between April 1, 1998, and March 31, 2006, as well as their donor information. All costs (outpatient care, diagnostic imaging, inpatient care, physician claims, laboratory tests and transplant medications) for 2 years after transplant for recipients and transplant-related costs prior to transplant (donor workup and management) were included. Complete cost information was available for 357 recipients. The mean total 2-year cost of transplantation, including donor costs, for recipients of living and deceased donors was $118 347 (95% confidence interval [CI], 110 395-126 299) and $121 121 (95% CI 114 287-127 956), respectively (p = 0.7). The mean cost for a living donor was $18 129 (95% CI 16 845-19 414) and for a deceased donor was $36 989 (95% CI 34 421-39 558). Living donor kidney transplantation has similar costs at 2 years compared with deceased donor transplantation. These results can be used by health care decision makers to inform strategies to increase donation.