Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transplantation ; 102(8): 1367-1374, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30044364

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The healthcare costs to evaluate, perform surgery, and follow a living kidney donor for the year after donation are poorly described. METHODS: We obtained information on the healthcare costs of 1099 living kidney donors between April 1, 2004, and March 31, 2014, from Ontario, Canada, using comprehensive healthcare administrative databases. We estimated the cost of 3 periods of the living donation process: the predonation evaluation period (start of evaluation until the day before donation), perioperative period (day of donation until 30-days postdonation), and 1 year of follow-up period (after perioperative period until 1 year postdonation). We analyzed data for donors and healthy matched nondonor controls using regression-based methods to estimate the incremental cost of living donation. Costs are presented from the perspective of the Canadian healthcare payer (2017 CAD $). RESULTS: The incremental healthcare costs (compared with controls) for the evaluation, perioperative, and follow-up periods were CAD $3596 (95% confidence interval [CI], CAD $3350-$3842), CAD $11 694 (95% CI, CAD $11 415-CAD $11 973), and $1011 (95% CI, CAD $793-CAD $1230), respectively, totalling CAD $16 290 (95% CI, CAD $15 814-CAD $16 767). The evaluation cost was higher if the intended recipient started dialysis partway through the donor evaluation (CAD $886; 95% CI, CAD $19, CAD $1752). The perioperative cost varied across transplant centers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although substantial costs of living donor care are related to the nephrectomy procedure, comprehensive assessment of costs must also include the evaluation and follow-up periods. These estimates are informative for planning future work to support and expand living donation and transplantation, and directing efforts to improve the cost efficiency of living donor care.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/economia , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Doadores Vivos , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente , Idoso , Canadá , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Seguimentos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrectomia/economia , Ontário , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Período Pós-Operatório , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 11(6): 964-972, 2016 06 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27197905

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of targeted screening for identification of CKD is largely unknown. The See Kidney Disease (SeeKD) targeted screening project aimed to determine the prevalence of unrecognized CKD in Canada. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The SeeKD project was conducted across Canada using a convenience sample approach and events to identify adults with risk factors for CKD (i.e., diabetes, hypertension, vascular disease, family history of kidney problems, etc.). Participants with at least one risk factor received a point-of-care creatinine measurement to identify unrecognized CKD (CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)). Baseline information included clinical characteristics, sociodemographics, and health knowledge. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with each Kidney Foundation of Canada branch (regionalized locations) after the screening events to characterize local screening strategies, which were subsequently categorized as individual-targeted (specifically targeting individuals at risk of CKD) and community-targeted (event in a community location in proximity to a high-risk population). We calculated the prevalence of unrecognized CKD overall, and by screening strategy. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and February 2014, 6329 Canadians participated in SeeKD screening events. Participants were predominantly female (65.3%), middle-aged (mean, 58.5 years), and the majority (88.9%) self-reported at least one risk factor for CKD. Of participants with at least one risk factor, 92.3% (n=5194) were screened, of whom 18.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 17.8 to 19.9) had unrecognized CKD; the majority (13.8%) had stage 3a CKD (eGFR=45-60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)). The prevalence of unrecognized CKD was higher for branches with individual versus community-targeted events (21.9% [95% CI, 20.5 to 23.4] versus 14.7% [95% CI, 13.2 to 16.2]). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted screening identified a high proportion of individuals with risk factors for CKD and a high prevalence of unrecognized CKD. Future research will evaluate the ability of targeted screening to promote self-management behaviors addressing priorities for people with CKD.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Creatinina/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Testes Imediatos , Prevalência , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/genética , Fatores de Risco , Doenças Vasculares/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...