Using Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS)-based analysis in the development of regional risk adjustment tools to trend quality in a voluntary trauma system: the experience of the Trauma Foundation of Northeast Ohio.

BACKGROUND: Presently, no trauma system exists in Ohio. Since 1993, all hospitals in Cuyahoga County (CUY), northeast Ohio (n = 22) provide data to a trauma registry. In return, each received hospital-specific data, comparison data by trauma care level and a county-wide aggregate summary. This report describes the results of this approach in our region. METHODS: All cases were entered by paper abstract or electronic download. Interrater reliability audits and z score analysis was performed by using the Major Trauma Outcome Study and the CUY 1994 baseline groups. Risk adjustment of mortality data was performed using statistical modeling and logistic regression (Trauma and Injury Severity Score, Major Trauma Outcome Study, CUY). Trauma severity measures were defined. RESULTS: In 1995, 3,375 patients were entered. Two hundred ninety-one died (8.6%). Severity measures differed by level of trauma care, indicating differences in case mix. Probability of survival was lowest in the Level I centers, highest in the acute care hospitals. Outcomes z scores demonstrated survival differences for all levels. CONCLUSIONS: In a functioning trauma system, the most severely injured patients should be cared for at the trauma centers. A low volume at acute care hospitals is desirable. By using Trauma and Injury Severity Score with community-specific constants, NE Ohio is accomplishing these goals. The Level I performance data are an interesting finding compared with the data from the Level II centers in the region

Optimizing the management of blunt splenic injury in adults and children.

BACKGROUND: The treatment for splenic injury is evolving to an increased use of nonoperative management. We studied patients with blunt injury to the spleen to determine the overall success with splenic salvage and the reason that adults and children have different outcomes. METHODS: Patient records were reviewed retrospectively for information and parameters that may influence outcome. Patients were categorized by age and type of management. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-seven patients (222 adults; 45 children < 16 years old) with blunt splenic trauma were treated over a 7.5-year period. Adults had a significantly higher injury severity score (ISS; 27.2 +/- 0.9 vs 19.9 +/- 2.0; P < .05), splenic injury score (SIS; 2.8 +/- 0.1 vs 2.3 +/- 0.1; P < .01), and mortality rate (11.7% vs 2.2%; P < .05) compared with children. Eighty-six adults and 3 children had emergent operation; 23 patients had splenorrhaphy. Nonoperative management was selected initially in 178 patients; 83% (105 adults and 42 children) were treated successfully. The ISS and SIS of patients in whom nonoperative management failed were different from those patients in whom treatment was successful (ISS, 27.5 +/- 2.1 vs 20.6 +/- 1.0; SIS, 3.6 +/- 0.2 vs 2.1 +/- 0.1; P < .05) but were similar to those patients who needed initial emergent operation. Adults and children who had successful nonoperative management had similar ISSs (21.4 +/- 1.1 vs 18.4 +/- 2.0) and SISs (2.0 +/- 0.1 vs 2.3 +/- 0.1). Overall splenic salvage was achieved in 64% of patients (57% of adults and 96 % of children). Salvage increased from 50% to 85% during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Splenic preservation is possible in most adults and children with blunt injury with the appropriate use of both operative salvage and nonoperative treatment. The higher salvage rate and decreased need for operation in children is due to their lower severity of overall injury and splenic injury. Operative salvage has become less common in adults because more patients are selected for nonoperative management.

Effectiveness of a 2-specialty, 2-tiered triage and trauma team activation protocol.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness, safety, and resource allocation of a 2-specialty, 2-tiered triage and trauma team activation protocol. METHODS: We conducted a 6-month retrospective analysis of a 2-specialty, 2-tiered trauma team activation system at an urban Level I trauma center. Based on prehospital data, patients with a high likelihood of serious injury were assigned to triage category 1 and patients with a low likelihood of serious injury were assigned to category 2. Category 1 patients were immediately evaluated by both emergency medicine and trauma services. Category 2 patients were evaluated initially by emergency medicine staff with a mandatory trauma service consultation. Main outcomes measured included mortality, need for emergency procedures, need for emergency surgery, complications, and discharge disposition. Potential physician-hours saved were calculated for category 2 cases. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-one patients were assigned a triage classification (272 to category 1 and 289 to category 2). Category 1 patients had a higher mortality rate (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference of 15.9%, 11.1% to 20.7%, P < .0001), need for emergency surgery (10.7% versus 1.4%, 95% CI for difference of 9.3%, 5.2% to 13.4%; P < .0001), need for emergency procedures (89% of total procedures, 95% CI 83% to 95%; P < .0001), and discharges to rehabilitation facilities (95% CI for difference of 15.1%, 9.3% to 21.0%; P < .0001). The 2-tiered response system saved an estimated 578 physician-hours of time for the trauma service over the study period. CONCLUSION: This evaluation tool effectively predicts likelihood of serious injury, mortality, need for emergency surgery, and need for rehabilitation. Patients with a low likelihood of serious injury may be initially evaluated by the emergency medicine service effectively and safely, thus allowing more efficient use of surgical personnel.

Injured intoxicated drivers: citation, conviction, referral, and recidivism rates.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Several studies have suggested that legally intoxicated drivers who are injured when involved in a motor vehicle crash are unlikely to be cited or prosecuted for driving under the influence (DUI). The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the rates of citation and prosecution of legally intoxicated drivers who are injured in a motor vehicle crash and hospitalized in a Level I trauma center, (2) the rates of previous and subsequent alcohol-related citation in this population, and (3) the rate of referral for treatment of alcohol-related problems made during the hospital stay. METHODS: In a retrospective review of trauma registry and Cleveland Municipal Court records from January 1993 through April 1995, we examined the records of all drivers injured in a motor vehicle crash who were transported to a Level I urban trauma center, admitted to the trauma service, and determined to have a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .10 gm% or higher at the time of admission to the emergency department. RESULTS: Seventy drivers admitted after a motor vehicle crash had a BAC of .10 gm% or higher. This represented 33% of the drivers older than 16 years of age who were admitted to the trauma service. Twenty-three drivers (32.8%) were cited for DUI, and 15 (21%) of the 70 were successfully prosecuted and convicted. Four of 23 cited drivers had previous citations; another 5 incurred subsequent citations during the study period. Eight of the 70 drivers who were admitted with a high BAC were referred for outpatient alcohol counseling after discharge. None were offered counseling as inpatients. CONCLUSION: Citation and prosecution rates of legally intoxicated drivers injured in motor vehicle crashes and hospitalized in our trauma center were low. Recognition of alcoholism and inpatient counseling were rare. Multiple alcohol-related citations were common among drivers cited for DUI.

Benchmarking the quality-monitoring process: a comparison of outcomes analysis by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) methodology with the peer-review process.

BACKGROUND: One measure of optimal function within a trauma center is the ability to critically examine outcomes from the process of care within the institution, yet guidelines for evaluation of the peer-review process are lacking. This study was conducted to determine the correlation between mortality analysis performed by the peer-review process (PR) within a trauma division and outcome analysis as determined by Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) methodology. METHODS: The mortality peer-review data for an entire year at our level I trauma center served as the study population. Information was obtained on probability of survival, and a determination of preventability was made using standard, preexisting criteria. Peer review involves assigning each outcome to a specific category through the process of multidisciplinary assessment. Probability of survival data was not used for this purpose. Kappa analysis was performed to determine the degree of agreement in each category and then tested for significance. RESULTS: One hundred four deaths in 1,868 trauma patients (5.5%) were reviewed at our multidisciplinary conference. Outcomes were judged as preventable, potentially preventable, or nonpreventable. Death directly related to exsanguination was typically categorized as potentially preventable. Kappa analysis demonstrated the greatest agreement between PR and TRISS in the nonpreventable category (kappa = 0.213) and the least agreement in the potentially preventable category (kappa = -0.197). Overall, the kappa Z statistic was nonsignificant (Z = 1.24). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary peer-review outcomes analysis is at least as effective as the computer-generated TRISS probability of survival data for evaluating quality of care in a trauma center and may be more effective for analysis of potentially preventable outcomes.

Closed head injuries in children: is hospital admission always necessary?

The objective of this study was to identify a group of patients with mild closed head injury, lack of other significant trauma, and normal head computerized tomograph (CT), who could be safely observed at home by a reliable caretaker. Data were from a retrospective chart review of pediatric emergency department (PED) and hospital course of an urban university children's hospital. The pediatric trauma registry was used to identify patients one to 17 years old seen in the PED with closed-head injury and normal head CT between June 1991 and August 1992. A total of 746 patients with heads injury were seen in the PED, and 161 patients with closed-head injury were admitted during the study period. Sixty-two patients (mean age = 8.5 +/- 5 years) met inclusion criteria with hospital admission, mild head injury, Glasgow Coma Scale > or = 13, and normal head CT. Of the patients 63% (34) were male and 37% (23) were female, with 74% (46) African-American and 26% (16) Caucasian. The most frequent mechanisms of injury were 27% (17) fall from height (mean height = 6.7 +/- 4.6 feet) and 18% (11) passenger in a motor vehicle accident. Patients had a median Glasgow Coma Scale of 15 (mean 14.8) and median abbreviated injury score of 2 (mean = 1.8). Thirty-seven percent of patients (23) had a history of loss of consciousness (range one to five minutes) and 6% (4) had generalized tonic-clonic seizure after the injury.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)