A Pilot Investigation of Nonpharmacological Pain Management Intervention Groups in Methadone Maintenance Treatment.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the feasibility (i.e., single-session attendance) of conducting 3 counselor-delivered nonpharmacological pain management intervention (NPMI) groups in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT): (1) Coping with Pain, an intervention based on cognitive-behavioral therapy, (2) Wii-Covery, an exergame intervention to facilitate exercise, and (3) Juggling Group, an intervention to promote social inclusion and reduce stress. We examined pre-post session changes in pain and mood associated with group attendance. METHODS: Over 1 month at an MMT clinic with 1800 patients, each NPMI group was offered daily Monday-Friday and 1 was offered on Saturdays. A standardized but unvalidated measure was administered before and after sessions to assess acute changes in current pain intensity and mood states. Paired t-tests with Bonferroni corrections were performed for each NPMI group (P < 0.0007 [.05/7]). RESULTS: About 452 patients (67% male, 84% White, mean age, 40) attended at least 1 NPMI group. About 57% reported current chronic pain. Attendance at any NPMI group (for the whole sample and the subset with chronic pain) was significantly associated with acute reductions in current pain intensity, anxiety, depression, and stress, and acute increases in current energy and happiness. Attendance at Coping with Pain and Juggling Group was also associated with acute increases in compassion. CONCLUSIONS: Coping with Pain, Wii-Covery, and Juggling Group are feasible to conduct in MMT, and acute improvements in current pain intensity and specific mood states associated with a single session attendance point to the importance of examining systematically the efficacy of these and other NPMIs in MMT.

Green tea catechins decrease total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Green tea catechins (GTCs) have been studied in randomized control trials for their lipid-lowering effects. Studies, however, have been small and demonstrated conflicting results. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the relationship between GTCs and serum lipid levels, including total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and the Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database was conducted through March 2010. Randomized controlled trials evaluating GTCs vs control in human beings and reporting efficacy data on at least one of the aforementioned serum lipid endpoints were included. Weighted mean differences for changes from baseline (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for lipid endpoints were calculated using random-effects models. Twenty trials (N=1,415) met all inclusion criteria. Upon meta-analysis, GTCs at doses ranging from 145 to 3,000 mg/day taken for 3 to 24 weeks reduced total (-5.46 mg/dL [-0.14 mmol/L]; 95% CI -9.59 to -1.32) and LDL cholesterol (-5.30 mg/dL [-0.14 mmol/L]; 95% CI -9.99 to -0.62) compared to control. GTCs did not significantly alter HDL cholesterol (-0.27 mg/dL [-0.007 mmol/L]; 95% CI -1.62 to 1.09) or triglyceride (3.00 mg/dL [-0.034 mmol/L]; 95% CI -2.73 to 8.73) levels. The consumption of GTCs is associated with a statistically significant reduction in total and LDL cholesterol levels; however, there was no significant effect on HDL cholesterol or triglyceride levels.