Monitoring of prenatal patients using a combined antibody titre for Rh and non-Rh antibodies.

OBJECTIVES: This was a laboratory exercise designed to determine whether combined antibody titrations in the presence of multiple antibodies achieve a critical level earlier or at the same time as antibodies having individual antibody titrations. BACKGROUND: Management of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn involves monitoring maternal antibody concentration by antibody titration. Separate titrations are generally performed for each antibody. METHOD: Thirty-one samples containing combinations of two different Rh and/or non-Rh antibodies were examined with separate titres for each antibody and one single combined titration. RESULTS: Of 31 samples, 19 (61.3%) showed an increased combined titre. Of 12 samples that showed no increase, 10 contained a separate titre of <1 for either one or both antibodies. Where both antibodies had a separate titre of ≥1, 15 of 17 (88.2%) showed an increased combined titre. In contrast to the separate titration method, no decrease in titre level was observed using the combined method. CONCLUSION: Where two antibodies are present, titrations performed by a combined method will produce titre levels equal to or higher than antibodies titred individually. Therefore, a combined titration can be expected to reach a critical titre level as early as, or earlier in gestation than, antibodies monitored by a single titration method. Further studies relating fetal outcomes to titration methodology would be valuable in determining the validity of this approach for prenatal management. Cost-effectiveness of this approach to prenatal screening should also be assessed.

Resolving variable maternal D typing using serology and genotyping in selected prenatal patients.

BACKGROUND: RhIG prophylaxis for D- pregnant women prevents hemolytic disease of the newborn and typically depends on results of serologic D typing. Interpretation and follow-up of weak D serology is variable. Recent recommendations promote genotyping for RHD status determination in those with weak D serology. Canadian Blood Services performs comprehensive serologic prenatal testing in four provinces. Genotyping is used to determine D typing in patients with weak D. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A serologic algorithm identified which patients require genotyping for RHD determination. Genotyping was performed on one of two commercially available platforms. RESULTS: Only 0.4% of D- patients met criteria for genotyping. Sixty-one percent were weak D Type 1, 2, or 3. Thirty percent had a partial or weak D other than Type 1, 2, or 3. Eleven had variants which remained unresolved. Seventeen were D+ and four were D-. CONCLUSIONS: Genotyping of patients with weak D serology led to an identified genotype in most patients. RhIG administration was avoided in 66% who were weak D Type 1, 2, or 3 or were D+. The use of a serologic algorithm to select patients for RHD genotyping identifies a majority of patients with weak D types not at risk for alloimmunization. This approach limits the number of genotyping investigations and the cost of providing classification for weak D types.