The future application of nanomedicine and biomimicry in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Plastic surgery encompasses a broad spectrum of reconstructive challenges and prides itself upon developing and adopting new innovations. Practice has transitioned from microsurgery to supermicrosurgery with a possible future role in even smaller surgical frontiers. Exploiting materials on a nanoscale has enabled better visualization and enhancement of biological processes toward better wound healing, tumor identification and viability of tissues, all cornerstones of plastic surgery practice. Recent advances in nanomedicine and biomimicry herald further reconstructive progress facilitating soft and hard tissue, nerve and vascular engineering. These lay the foundation for improved biocompatibility and tissue integration by the optimization of engineered implants or tissues. This review will broadly examine each of these technologies, highlighting areas of progress that reconstructive surgeons may not be familiar with, which could see adoption into our armamentarium in the not-so-distant future.

Novel Proteomic Assay of Breast Implants Reveals Proteins With Significant Binding Differences: Implications for Surface Coating and Biocompatibility.

BACKGROUND: Silicone elastomer, a ubiquitous biomaterial and main constituent of breast implants, has been used for breast augmentation and reconstruction for over 50 years. Breast implants have direct local and purported systemic effects on normal tissue homeostasis dictated by the chemical and physical presence of the implant. OBJECTIVES: Protein adsorption has been demonstrated to be a key driver of local reactions to silicone. We sought to develop an assay and identify the proteins that coat implants during breast implantation. METHODS: Wound fluid was salvaged from women who had undergone breast reduction and incubated in contact with the surface of 13 commercially available implant surfaces. An in situ digestion technique was optimized to elute bound proteins. Samples were analyzed on an Orbitrap elite analyser, proteins identified in Mascot Demon and analyzed in Progenesis. RESULTS: A total of 822 proteins were identified, bound to the surfaces of the implants. Extracellular proteins were the most abundant ontology, followed by intracellular proteins. Fibrinogen, a proinflammatory protein and Albumin, an anti-inflammatory protein had significant (P < 0.0001) binding differences between the surfaces studied. Complement C3, C5, and factor H were also shown to have significantly different binding affinities for the implants included in the study (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a novel assay of breast implant protein binding and demonstrated significant binding affinities for relevant proteins derived from breast tissue wound fluid.

Pre-operative Axillary Ultrasound-Guided Needle Sampling in Breast Cancer: Comparing the Sensitivity of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative ultrasound-guided needle sampling (UNS) of abnormal axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer can identify patients with axillary metastases and therefore rationalize patient care and inform decision-making. To obtain tissue diagnosis, UNS can be performed by either fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB). However, few studies have compared the sensitivity of these techniques and the majority show no difference. METHODS: All node-positive patients (those with micro- and macrometastases but not isolated tumor cells) treated at a tertiary referral center between January 2012 and December 2015 were retrospectively identified from pathology records. The result of the first axillary UNS performed on each patient was compared with postoperative histopathology results. The UNS method used was according to individual radiologist preference. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients underwent FNA (1 patient had bilateral breast cancer and underwent bilateral FNA), and 92 underwent CNB. Sensitivity of CNB was significantly higher than FNA (83.7 vs. 69.0%, P = 0.008). The false-negative rate in the FNA group was therefore higher than in the CNB group by a factor of 2.5. There was no difference in inadequacy rate between the two techniques. There were no complications in the FNA group, and only one hematoma (which did not require operative intervention) in the CNB group. CONCLUSIONS: CNB is safe and should be the preferred technique for UNS to improve sensitivity.

Breast implant surface development: perspectives on development and manufacture.

Capsular contracture poses a significant clinical and scientific research challenge for breast surgeons. Some researchers have pointed to the surface features of implant devices as being responsible for the potential tightening and hardening of the surrounding capsule. In this article, the authors review the history and development of breast implant design, specifically the data supporting improvements that have potential to mitigate the incidence of capsular contracture. The literature suggests that development of new implant surfaces designed to reduce a patient's foreign body response will improve the safety profile of implant devices and increase patient satisfaction in the long-term.

The long-term outcome of laparoscopic colposuspension: a 10-year cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to provide long-term outcome data, at least 10 years, following laparoscopic colposuspension. METHODS: The study includes a control group who underwent open colposuspension. A consecutive series of 139 women who had undergone laparoscopic colposuspension were reviewed and compared to 52 women who had an open colposuspension in the same unit. Subjects were contacted by telephone, at least 10 years post-operatively, at which time a structured interview was performed which included the short-form Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom questionnaire. RESULTS: There was deterioration in subjective cure rates from 71% and 67% at 6 months to 52% and 36% at 10 years for the laparoscopic and open procedures, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that laparoscopic colposuspension is probably as durable as open colposuspension. However, cure rates for both procedures appear to deteriorate over time, emphasising the importance of long-term follow-up.