Surgical treatment of ipsilateral bifocal tibial fractures: a challenge for the surgeon. / Tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas bifocales ipsilaterales de tibia: un reto para el cirujano.

INTRODUCTION: The association of ipsilateral tibia fractures has a low incidence, being up to 3.2% of total tibia fractures. Currently there is no gold standard regarding the ideal surgical treatment. The objective of this study is to analyze the surgical treatment and the radiographic and functional results, as well as the associated complication rate of ipsilateral bifocal tibia fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in our hospital from 2010 to 2022 of 24 patients who underwent bifocal fracture of the ipsilateral tibia. Demographic and surgical data and complications during follow-up were included. RESULTS: The 24 patients were classified into group 1 when they presented a fracture of the plateau and distal tibia (25%), group 2 with a fracture of the plateau and diaphysis (33%) and group 3 with a fracture of the diaphysis and distal tibia (42%). 3 patients underwent surgery with 1 implant and 21 patients with 2 implants. The average follow-up time in outpatient clinics was 2 and a half years. At one year, 22 patients (92%) had full weight bearing and 2 patients had partial weight bearing (8%) due to the sequelae of the fractures. The average time for consolidation of the diaphysis was 7.75±2 months, with no significant differences observed between group 2 and group 3 (p=0.06). The average time for consolidation of the metaphysis was 3.50±1.5 months, with no significant differences observed between group 1 and group 2 (p=0.065). 7 patients (30%) had complications during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Bifocal tibia fractures can be treated using a combination of intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis with good long-term results, obtaining an optimal union rate and low complications. In addition, it facilitates the reduction of the fracture, thus facilitating the patient's recovery and obtaining good long-term functional results.

Treating multifocal humerus fractures: A comparison between the mipo technique and intramedullary nailing.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Proximal humerus fractures with metaphysodiaphyseal extension represent a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon due to their reduced incidence and the difficulty in the treatment decision. These can be treated with an intramedullary nail or using the MIPO technique, associating different advantages and complications depending on the procedure. The objective of this study was to compare metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with antegrade intramedullary nailing and those operated using the MIPO technique to see if there were significant differences in terms of functional, clinical, and radiological results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: retrospective, analytical and unicentric review of 29 patients with proximal fracture with metaphyseal-diaphyseal extension treated by MIPO technique and 33 patients surgically treated by antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) in our hospital from 2014 to 2020. Demographic, functional, radiographic and clinical data were obtained.. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between both groups in terms of fracture mechanism (p=0.34), fracture type (p=0.13) or Maresca classification (p=0.32). Surgical time was significantly shorter in the IMN group compared to the MIPO technique (p=0.014). No significant difference was observed regarding the need for blood transfusion (p=0.32). The mean consolidation in the MIPO group was 21 weeks compared to 21 weeks in the IMN, with no significant differences between both groups (p= 0.88). No significant differences were observed between CONSTANT test at one year in the MIPO group versus the IMN group (p=0.79), nor in radial nerve palsies (p=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Proximal fractures with metaphyseal-diaphyseal extension are a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon due to the infrequency, the complexity of these fractures and the fact that there is no established consensus on the ideal treatment for this type of injury. Both the MIPO technique with the Philos plate and the intramedullary nail are valid options for the treatment of these fractures, with no differences observed in terms of fracture consolidation time or in terms of functional results.

The impact of hip fracture on health-related quality of life and activities of daily living: the SPARE-HIP prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The medical morbidity and mortality associated with neck of femur fractures is well-documented, whereas there is limited data for patient-reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to characterize the impact of neck of femur fractures on activities of daily living and patient-reported health-related quality of life. METHODS: Design and participants: Multicentric prospective cohort study. Consecutive sample patients with fragility hip fracture over 50 years old admitted in 48 hospitals in Spain. OUTCOMES: daily living activity function (Barthel Index) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) pre-fracture, admission to hospital and at 1- and 4-month follow-up post-fracture. STATISTICS: Barthel and EQ-5D over time are described as mean (SD) and median (interquartile range). RESULTS: A total of 997 patients were recruited at baseline with 4-month outcomes available for, and 856 patients (89.5%). Barthel Index fell from 78.77 (23.75) at baseline to 43.62 (19.86) on admission to hospital with the fracture. Scores partially recovered to 54.89 (25.40) and 64.09 (21.35) at 1- and 4-month post-fracture, respectively. EQ-5D fell from a median of 0.75 (0.47-0.91) to - 0.01 (- 0.03 to 0.51) on admission. Partial recovery was observed again to (0.51 (- 0.06 to 0.67)) and (0.60 (0.10 to 0.80)) at 1- and 4-month post-fracture, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture results in a large decline in the ability to perform activities of daily living and patient-reported health-related quality of life with only partial recovery amongst survivors 4-month post-fracture.

Un nuevo método de evaluación diagnóstica y terapéuticade las patologías del pie basado en las plantillas instrumentadasBiofoot/IBV / A new diagnostic and therapeutic diagnostic method of the foot disease based on Biofoot/IBV instrumented insoles

Introducción: En este trabajo se realiza la puesta a punto y validación de un nuevo protocolo clínico de valoración diagnóstica de cuadros sindrómicos álgicos en el pie y de evaluación del tratamiento ortésico prescrito, basado en el uso de un sistema de registro de presiones plantares desarrollado a tal efecto Biofoot/IBV. Material y métodos: Se ha realizado un estudio prospectivo de pacientes adultos en tres etapas: una inicial en la que se estableció un protocolo clínico que fue evaluado durante la segunda etapa (piloto) y utilizado en la última fase (práctica clínica). El protocolo clínico utilizado incluye la escala de valoración funcional de Kitaoka et al1, y el sistema de medida de plantillas instrumentadas Biofoot/IBV para el diagnóstico clínico, prescripción y validación terapéutica, cuando ésta ha sido ortésica. Resultados y discusión: El 75 por ciento de los cuadros sindrómicos álgicos del pie correspondió a metatarsalgias. Se han identificado patrones de presiones tanto en la región metatarsiana como en el talón que, aunque no resultan efectivos en la detección de la presencia/ausencia de dolor (88 por ciento/ 47 por ciento), han contribuido a explicar las variaciones introducidas por el tratamiento ortésico aplicado. Los pacientes a quienes se les adjuntó a la prescripción a entregar a la ortopedia copia impresa del registro de presiones máximas presentaron evolución favorable en el 90 por ciento de los casos, frente al 50 por ciento de resultados favorables del grupo que no dispuso del registro. Conclusiones: La utilización del sistema de plantillas instrumentadas Biofoot/IBV asociado al protocolo de valoración clínica descrito es un método diagnóstico válido de cuadros sindrómicos álgicos en el pie y efectivo en la evaluación de tratamientos ortésicos (AU)