Late-term fetuses with reduced umbilical vein blood flow volume: An under-recognized population at increased risk of growth restriction.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the umbilical vein and uterine arteries blood flow volume (UV-Q, UtA-Q) in late-term pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational cohort study of singleton pregnancies ≥40 + 0 weeks in which UV-Q and UtA-Q, both absolute and normalized for estimated fetal weight (EFW) values, were evaluated in relation to AC drop of ≥20 percentiles from 20 weeks to term, Doppler signs of fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution and composite adverse perinatal outcome. The presence of neonatal hypoglycaemia and the need of formula milk supplementation were also examined. RESULTS: The study population comprised 200 women. Fetuses with AC drop (n = 34) had a significantly lower UV-Q and UV-Q/EFW than fetuses without AC drop (n = 166): median UV-Q 184 ml/min (IQR 143-225) vs 233 ml/min (IQR 181-277), p = 0.0006; median UV-Q/EFW 55 ml/min/kg (IQR 42-66) vs 63 ml/min/kg (IQR 48-74), p = 0.03. Fetuses with cerebral blood flow redistribution (n = 48) had a significantly lower UV-Q and UV-Q/EFW than those without (n = 134): median UV-Q 210 ml/min (IQR 155-263) vs 236 ml/min (IQR 184-278), p = 0.04; median UV-Q/EFV 58 ml/min/kg (IQR 45-70) vs 65 ml/min/kg (IQR 50-76), p = 0.04. There was a significant moderate correlation between middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI) and UV-Q and UV-Q/EFW (Spearman Rho -0.20 and -0.20; p = 0.008 and p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The umbilical vein blood flow volume might have a potential role to identify fetuses with stunted growth in late-term pregnancies.

First-trimester absent nasal bone: is it a predictive factor for pathogenic CNVs in the low-risk population?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of first-trimester absent nasal bone (NB) and genetic abnormalities at G-banding karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) according to the nuchal translucency (NT) thickness. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of fetuses that underwent the first-trimester scan for the combined test at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks' gestation. Invasive test with G-banding karyotype and/or CMA was performed based on the result of the combined test or if fetal defects were detected or for patient's choice, after genetic counseling. All cases with absent NB in the first and second trimester underwent a detailed anomaly scan with echocardiography in the second trimester, had a longitudinal ultrasound, and postnatal follow-up up to at least 1 year. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2018, 7228 women underwent the first-trimester scan at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks. Overall prevalence of absent NB was 1.3% (96/7228). Of those, in 86 pregnancies (1.2%), the absence of NB was confirmed also in the second trimester: 0.58% (40/6909) in the group with NT <95th centile; 6%(14/233) in the group with NT between 95 and 99th centile; and 37.2% (32/86) in the group with NT >99th centile, respectively. CMA pathogenic variants were found only in the group with NT >99th centile with a diagnostic yield of 9.4%. Fetuses with absent NB and NT between 95 and 99th centile had in 57% (8/14) a major chromosomal anomaly, while in the NT <95 centile group, there were 5% (2/40) of chromosomal abnormalities (one inherited from the father). CONCLUSION: In the first trimester, the risk for genetic syndromes detectable by CMA is related mainly to the NT thickness rather than to the absence of NB per se. In fetuses with absent NB and NT >99th centile, CMA should be performed after karyotype analysis, while for NT between 95 and 99th centile, a karyotype should be proposed as first-line procedure. Data provided by our study may be helpful in counseling women/couples when an absent NB is identified in the first trimester.

The role of gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on the risk of newborn macrosomia: results from a prospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: It is crucial to identify in large population samples the most important determinants of excessive fetal growth. The aim of the study was to evaluate the independent role of pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain and gestational diabetes on the risk of macrosomia. METHODS: A prospective study collected data on mode of delivery and maternal/neonatal outcomes in eleven Hospitals in Italy. Multiple pregnancies and preterm deliveries were excluded. The sample included 14109 women with complete records. Associations between exposure variables and newborn macrosomia were analyzed using Pearson's chi squared test. Multiple logistic regression models were built to assess the independent association between potential predictors and macrosomia. RESULTS: Maternal obesity (adjusted OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.2), excessive gestational weight gain (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.2) and diabetes (adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-3.0 for gestational; adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.6 for pre-gestational) resulted to be independent predictors of macrosomia, when adjusted for other recognized risk factors. Since no significant interaction was found between pre-gestational BMI and gestational weight gain, excessive weight gain should be considered an independent risk factor for macrosomia. In the sub-group of women affected by gestational or pre-gestational diabetes, pre-gestational BMI was not significantly associated to macrosomia, while excessive pregnancy weight gain, maternal height and gestational age at delivery were significantly associated. In this sub-population, pregnancy weight gain less than recommended was not significantly associated to a reduction in macrosomia. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that maternal obesity, gestational weight gain excess and diabetes should be considered as independent risk factors for newborn macrosomia. To adequately evaluate the clinical evolution of pregnancy all three variables need to be carefully assessed and monitored.