Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
4.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 29(3): 222-230, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30183657

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Suspicion of an acute allergic reaction is a common reason for attending the emergency department (ED). However, there are few comparisons between the initial diagnosis of suspected allergic reaction made in the ED with the definitive diagnosis made subsequently in the allergy department (AD). Objective: To compare details of the initial diagnosis made in the ED relating to allergy with the final diagnosis made in the AD. METHODS: Patients attending the ED of 2 hospitals with suspected allergic reactions were prospectively enrolled based on key words. A certified allergy specialist reviewed the ED records of these patients and, if these were suggestive of an allergic reaction, the patients were scheduled for further evaluation at the allergy clinic. RESULTS: In total, 2000 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and October 2015. Of these, 1333 passed the initial assessment and underwent further evaluation. Of the 1333 patients, 528 underwent an allergological study, and 206 were confirmed as being allergic. With respect to drug allergy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most common triggers, followed by ß-lactams; in food allergy, plant-based foods were the most common. Only 16.4% of patients confirmed as having anaphylaxis in the AD were initially diagnosed with the condition in the ED. CONCLUSION: Of the 528 patients who finally underwent the full allergological study, fewer than half were confirmed as allergic. Moreover, anaphylaxis appears to be underdiagnosed in the ED. Better communication between the ED and the AD is necessary to improve the diagnosis and management of these patients.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Adulto , Alérgenos/imunologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Testes Cutâneos , Espanha
5.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 29(3): 222-230, 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-184088

RESUMO

Background: Suspicion of an acute allergic reaction is a common reason for attending the emergency department (ED). However, there are few comparisons between the initial diagnosis of suspected allergic reaction made in the ED with the definitive diagnosis made subsequently in the allergy department (AD).Objective: To compare details of the initial diagnosis made in the ED relating to allergy with the final diagnosis made in the AD. Methods: Patients attending the ED of 2 hospitals with suspected allergic reactions were prospectively enrolled based on key words. A certified allergy specialist reviewed the ED records of these patients and, if these were suggestive of an allergic reaction, the patients were scheduled for further evaluation at the allergy clinic. Results: In total, 2000 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and October 2015. Of these, 1333 passed the initial assessment and underwent further evaluation. Of the 1333 patients, 528 underwent an allergological study, and 206 were confirmed as being allergic. With respect to drug allergy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most common triggers, followed by ß-lactams; in food allergy, plant-based foods were the most common. Only 16.4% of patients confirmed as having anaphylaxis in the AD were initially diagnosed with the condition in the ED. Conclusion: Of the 528 patients who finally underwent the full allergological study, fewer than half were confirmed as allergic. Moreover, anaphylaxis appears to be underdiagnosed in the ED. Better communication between the ED and the AD is necessary to improve the diagnosis and management of these patients


Antecedentes: La sospecha de una reacción alérgica aguda es un motivo frecuente de consulta en urgencias. Sin embargo, hay pocos trabajos que comparen el diagnóstico inicial realizado en las unidades de urgencias con el diagnóstico definitivo realizado en las unidades de alergia. Objetivo: Analizar en detalle la sospecha diagnóstica inicial dada en urgencias con el diagnóstico definitivo en las consultas de alergia. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo, que consistió en la selección, en base a palabras claves, de pacientes con sospecha de reacción alérgica. En la fase de screening, se seleccionaron los pacientes en base a las palabras claves, finalmente aquellos pacientes que presentan reacción sugestiva de alergia se seleccionaron para evaluación final. Resultados: Se revisaron 2.000 pacientes entre abril de 2013 y octubre de 2015, de los cuales 1.333 se seleccionaron para la evaluación. Finalmente, 528 se sometieron a un estudio alergológico y 206 se confirmaron como alérgicos. Con respecto a las reacciones por fármacos, los AINE y ß-lactámicos fueron los mayormente implicados; en relación con los alimentos, los de origen vegetal fueron los más frecuentes. Sólo el 16,4% de los pacientes con anafilaxia confirmada tras el estudio de alergia, fueron diagnosticados inicialmente en urgencias. Conclusión: Sólo la mitad de los pacientes que finalizaron en estudio fueron confirmados como alérgicos. Un dato importante es el infradiagnóstico de la anafilaxia en las urgencias. Por ello pensamos que es necesaria una mejor comunicación entre las unidades de urgencias y alergia para mejorar el manejo clínico y terapéutico de estos pacientes


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle
6.
Allergy ; 72(9): 1346-1355, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28226401

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequent triggers of drug hypersensitivity with NSAIDs-induced urticaria/angioedema (NIUA) the most common phenotype. Loss of hypersensitivity has been reported for IgE-mediated reactions; however, it has not been assessed in nonimmunological reactions such as NIUA. We evaluated NSAID-hypersensitivity over time in NIUA patients. METHODS: Patients confirmed as NIUA by positive drug provocation test (DPT) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) during 2005-2012 (V1) were included (n=38). Subjects were prospectively re-evaluated by DPT with ASA/other NSAIDs at two time points between 2013 and 2015 (V2 and V3). Atopy was assessed by skin prick test (SPT) using inhalant and food allergens. RESULTS: Patients were evaluated at V1 and re-evaluated after 60 months (V2; IR:48-81) and a further 18 months (V3; IR:14-24). At V2, the majority (24; 63.15%) tolerated ASA and other NSAIDs (Group A) while 14 (36.84%) still reacted (Group B). At V3, all Group A patients remained tolerant; all Group B patients remained hypersensitive. The number of previous episodes reported at V1 and the percentage of reactions induced by ASA/ibuprofen were significantly lower in Group A (P=.005 and P=.006, respectively). Group A patients developed tolerance 72 months (IR:45-87) after their last evaluated reaction (V1); this interval was shorter in nonatopics (P=.003), patients who experienced reactions over 1 hour after NSAIDs administration (P=.001), and those who experienced isolated urticaria after NSAID intake (P=.024). CONCLUSIONS: NIUA patients may develop tolerance to NSAIDs over time, a process that seems to be influenced by atopy and type of clinical reaction.


Assuntos
Angioedema/induzido quimicamente , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Urticária/induzido quimicamente , Adulto , Aspirina/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Tolerância Imunológica , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Testes Cutâneos , Fatores de Tempo , Urticária/imunologia
7.
Allergy ; 72(1): 24-34, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27439024

RESUMO

In the past years, several investigators have demonstrated the existence of local nasal responses in some patients with typical allergic rhinitis symptoms but without atopy and have defined a new phenotype called local allergic rhinitis (LAR) or 'entopy'. In a percentage of LAR subjects, the upper airway disease is also associated with lower airway symptoms. After the description of this phenotype, the differential diagnosis between LAR and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) has become a challenge for the clinician. To correctly identify LAR patients is of high importance for treatment and management of these patients, and for an appropriate inclusion of patients in clinical trials and genetics studies. The treatment of LAR patients, in contrast with NAR, is oriented to allergen avoidance and specific treatment. Allergen immunotherapy, the aetiological treatment for allergic respiratory diseases, has demonstrated to be an effective and safe treatment in LAR, increasing immunological tolerance, and reducing the clinical symptoms and the use of medication. In this article, the important and novel aspects of LAR in terms of mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment will be discussed. Also, the involvement of the lower airway and the potential role of IgE in the bronchial disease will be also reviewed.


Assuntos
Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Rinite/etiologia , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/etiologia , Basófilos/imunologia , Basófilos/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Moléculas de Adesão Celular/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Mucosa Nasal/imunologia , Mucosa Nasal/metabolismo , Fenótipo , Doenças Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Doenças Respiratórias/metabolismo , Doenças Respiratórias/terapia , Rinite/diagnóstico , Rinite/metabolismo , Rinite/terapia
8.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 45(11): 1703-12, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26221871

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vivo and in vitro responses to nOle e 1 in allergic rhinitis (AR) and local allergic rhinitis (LAR) patients sensitized to olive tree pollen (OL) confirmed by nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT). METHODS: Twelve subjects with AR, 12 with LAR and 12 subjects as control group (CG) were selected. Skin testing and NAPT with nOle e 1 were performed. Eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) and tryptase were measured in nasal lavages before and after NAPT. Serum IgE to OL allergens was measured by ELISA. Basophil activation tests (BAT) with OL and nOle e 1 and dendritic cell maturation/proliferation studies were carried out. RESULTS: All AR (12/12) and 10/12 (83%) of LAR had a +NAPT to nOle e 1. ECP levels in nasal lavages were significantly increased after NAPT in both AR and LAR compared with CG at 15 min (P < 0.05). Serum IgE was positive only in AR. All AR had +BAT responses to OL and 10/12 to nOle e 1 (83%); 8/12 LAR (66.6%) had a +BAT to OL and 4/12 (33%) to nOle e 1, with only one subject of the CG with a +BAT to both OL and nOle e 1 (8%). Dendritic cell proliferation to nOle e 1 was increased in AR compared to LAR and CG (P = 0.019 and P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both AR and LAR had a similar in vivo response to nOle e 1 with release of inflammatory mediators. Specific basophil activation with OL and nOle e 1 was observed in LAR confirming previous data obtained with dust mites.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Olea/efeitos adversos , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Teste de Degranulação de Basófilos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Células Dendríticas/imunologia , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Proteína Catiônica de Eosinófilo/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Ativação Linfocitária/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes de Provocação Nasal , Pólen/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica/metabolismo , Testes Cutâneos , Triptases/metabolismo , Adulto Jovem
9.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 45(5): 872-881, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25495772

RESUMO

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is characterized by the presence of a nasal Th2 inflammatory response with local production of specific IgE antibodies and a positive response to a nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) without evidence of systemic atopy. The prevalence has been shown to be up to 25% in subjects affected with rhinitis with persistence, comorbidity and evolution similar to allergic rhinitis. LAR is a consistent entity that does not evolve to allergic rhinitis with systemic atopy over time although patients have significant impairment in quality of life and increase in the severity of nasal symptoms over time. Lower airways can be also involved. The diagnosis of LAR is based mostly on demonstration of positive response to NAPT and/or local synthesis of specific IgE. Allergens involved include seasonal or perennial such as house dusts mites, pollens, animal epithelia, moulds (alternaria) and others. Basophils from peripheral blood may be activated by the involved allergens suggesting the spill over of locally synthesized specific IgE to the circulation. LAR patients will benefit from the same treatment as allergic patients using antihistamines, inhaled corticosteroids and IgE antagonists. Studies on immunotherapy are ongoing and will determine its efficacy in LAR in terms of symptoms improvement and evolution of the natural course of the disease.


Assuntos
Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Rinite/imunologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Testes de Provocação Nasal , Fenótipo , Prevalência , Rinite/diagnóstico , Rinite/epidemiologia , Rinite/terapia , Rinite Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Células Th2/imunologia , Células Th2/metabolismo
10.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 44(12): 1461-72, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25040150

RESUMO

Hypersensitivity drug reactions (HDRs) encompass a wide spectrum of unpredictable clinical entities. They represent an important health problem, affecting people of all ages, and lead to a large strain on the public health system. Here, we summarize experiments that use high-throughput genomics technologies to investigate HDRs. We also introduce the field of systems biology as a relatively recent discipline concerned with the integration and analysis of high-throughput data sets such as DNA microarrays and next-generation sequencing data. We describe previous studies that have applied systems biology techniques to related fields such as allergy and asthma. Finally, we present a number of potential applications of systems biology to the study of HDRs, in order to make the reader aware of the types of analyses that can be performed and the insights that can be gained through their application.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Biologia de Sistemas , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/metabolismo , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala , Humanos , Biologia de Sistemas/métodos
11.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 24(3): 143-53; quiz 1 p following 153, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25011351

RESUMO

Hypersensitivity drug reactions (HDRs) vary over time in frequency, drugs involved, and clinical entities. Specific reactions are mediated by IgE, other antibody isotypes (IgG or IgM), and T cells. Nonspecific HDRs include those caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). beta-Lactams--the most important of which are amoxicillin and clavulanic acid--are involved in specific immunological mechanisms. Fluoroquinolones (mainly moxifloxacin, followed by ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) can also induce HDRs mediated by IgE and T cells. In the case of radio contrast media, immediate reactions have decreased, while nonimmediate reactions, mediated by T cells, have increased. There has been a substantial rise in hypersensitivity reactions to antibiotics and latex in perioperative allergic reactions to anesthetics. NSAIDs are the most frequent drugs involved in HDRs. Five well-defined clinical entities, the most common of which is NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema, have been proposed in a new consensus classification. Biological agents are proteins including antibodies that have been humanized in order to avoid adverse reactions. Reactions can be mediated by IgE or T cells or they may be due to an immunological imbalance. Chimeric antibodies are still in use and may have epitopes that are recognized by the immune system, resulting in allergic reactions.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Bloqueadores Neuromusculares/efeitos adversos , Linfócitos T/imunologia
12.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 24(3): 143-153, mayo.-jun. 2014. tab, ilus
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-127227

RESUMO

Hypersensitivity drug reactions (HDRs) vary over time in frequency, drugs involved, and clinical entities. Specific reactions are mediated by IgE, other antibody isotypes (IgG or IgM), and T cells. Nonspecific HDRs include those caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). β-Lactams-the most important of which are amoxicillin and clavulanic acid-are involved in specific immunological mechanisms. Fluoroquinolones (mainly moxifloxacin, followed by ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) can also induce HDRs mediated by IgE and T cells. In the case of radio contrast media, immediate reactions have decreased, while nonimmediate reactions, mediated by T cells, have increased. There has been a substantial rise in hypersensitivity reactions to antibiotics and latex in perioperative allergic reactions to anesthetics. NSAIDs are the most frequent drugs involved in HDRs. Five well-defined clinical entities, the most common of which is NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema, have been proposed in a new consensus classification. Biological agents are proteins including antibodies that have been humanized in order to avoid adverse reactions. Reactions can be mediated by IgE or T cells or they may be due to an immunological imbalance. Chimeric antibodies are still in use and may have epitopes that are recognized by the immune system, resulting in allergic reactions (AU)


Las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a fármacos (RHF) varían en el tiempo en frecuencia, fármacos implicados y entidades clínicas. Las reacciones específicas están mediadas por anticuerpos IgE o de otro isotipo (IgG o IgM) y por células T. En las no específicas se incluyen las producidas por AINES. Los betalactámicos están implicados en los mecanismos inmunológicos específicos. La amoxicilina y el ácido clavulánico son los más frecuentemente implicados. Las FQ pueden inducir reacciones mediadas por anticuerpos IgE o linfocitos T. El primero es el moxifloxacino seguido por ciprofloxacino y moxifloxacino. Las reacciones inmediatas a medios de contraste radiológicos han descendido con un incremento de las reacciones no inmediatas, mediadas por linfocitos T. En lo que concierne a las reacciones en el periodo perianestésico, un incremento importante se ha producido en la hipersensibilidad a antibióticos y látex. Los AINES son los fármacos más frecuentemente implicados en reacciones de hipersensibilidad. Se han propuesto cinco entidades bien diferenciadas siendo la urticaria/angioedema inducida por AINES en ausencia de urticaria crónica espontánea la más frecuente. Los fármacos biológicos son proteínas incluidas anticuerpos que han sido humanizadas a fin de evitar efectos adversos. Las reacciones pueden estar mediadas por IgE o linfocitos T. Pueden aparecer reacciones debidas a un imbalance inmunológico. Debido a que anticuerpos quiméricos todavía están en uso, estos pueden tener epítopes que sean reconocidos por el sistema inmune e inducir las reacciones alérgicas que se describen (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , beta-Lactamas/efeitos adversos , beta-Lactamas/imunologia , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/classificação
13.
J Immunol Methods ; 406: 43-50, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24631718

RESUMO

Quantitation of specific IgE by immunoassay is a recommended in vitro test for the diagnosis of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to betalactams (BLs), particularly when skin test results are negative. IgE antibodies that recognize the common nuclear structure of all BLs or the specific side chain structure can be mainly distinguished by immunoassays. The aim of this study was to develop an immunoassay system to detect IgE antibodies with different specificities. Cellulose discs conjugated with benzylpenicillin (BP), amoxicillin (AX) or both drugs, with poly-l-lysine (PLL) as carrier molecule, were used as solid phases in the radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Direct and inhibition radioimmunoassay studies were made to verify the structures recognized by serum IgE antibodies from penicillin-allergic patients. Our results indicated that the addition of both haptens did not decrease the capacity to capture IgE when serum specific to either BP or AX was used, at least in terms of sensitivity. In addition, the inclusion of two haptens improved significantly the levels of IgE detection in patients who recognized both BP and AX. Therefore, the use of a solid phase with a carrier molecule conjugated with two determinants (AX and BP) is helpful to recognize IgE antibodies against either of these determinants and is useful for screening sera with different specificities.


Assuntos
Amoxicilina/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/diagnóstico , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Penicilina G/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Amoxicilina/efeitos adversos , Afinidade de Anticorpos/imunologia , Especificidade de Anticorpos/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/imunologia , Epitopos/imunologia , Feminino , Haptenos/imunologia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/imunologia , Imunoensaio/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penicilina G/efeitos adversos , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Penicilinas/imunologia , Teste de Radioalergoadsorção/métodos , Testes Cutâneos , Adulto Jovem , beta-Lactamas/efeitos adversos , beta-Lactamas/imunologia
14.
Ingeniería (B. Aires) ; (1085): 16-18, 2003. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | BINACIS | ID: biblio-1163345

RESUMO

El autor presenta las obras de saneamiento publico iniciadas en 1869, poniendo de relevancia la incipiente ingenieria sanitaria del pais


Assuntos
História , Saneamento
15.
La Ingeniería ; (1085): 16-18, 2003. Ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | BINACIS | ID: bin-140727

RESUMO

El autor presenta las obras de saneamiento publico iniciadas en 1869, poniendo de relevancia la incipiente ingenieria sanitaria del pais


Assuntos
Saneamento , História
16.
An Esp Pediatr ; 10(5): 427-32, 1977 May.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-332024

RESUMO

Vaginal schwabs of 142 pregnant women in different stages of pregnancy have been studied. 45 women who weren't pregnant and had no signs of vaginal infections, were the control group of the study. A higher incidence of "Streptococcus agalactiae" in vaginal schwabs of women who weren't pregnant (15.5%), as compared to the pregnant women (7.1%) was observed. A lower incidence of "Streptococcus agalactiae" was found in the last three months of pregnancy (1.8%) which is in direct relation to the low number of neonatal sepsis caused by "Steptococcus agalactiae" found in our country.


Assuntos
Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/epidemiologia , Doenças Vaginais/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/microbiologia , Espanha , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolamento & purificação , Doenças Vaginais/microbiologia , Esfregaço Vaginal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...