Contemporary Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Emerging Techniques and Trends.

Abdominal wall reconstruction is a common and necessary surgery, two factors that drive innovation. This review article examines recent developments in ventral hernia repair including primary fascial closure, mesh selection between biologic, permanent synthetic, and biosynthetic meshes, component separation, and functional abdominal wall reconstruction from a plastic surgery perspective, exploring the full range of hernia repair's own reconstructive ladder. New materials and techniques are examined to explore the ever-increasing options available to surgeons who work within the sphere of ventral hernia repair and provide updates for evolving trends in the field.

Educational Podcasts in Plastic Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Content, Metrics, and Target Audiences.

BACKGROUND: Podcasts provide an efficient means for asynchronous learning. However, no study to date has thoroughly assessed the landscape of educational podcasts in plastic surgery. Thus, this study aims to evaluate and characterize current educational plastic surgery podcasts to ultimately inform future efforts. METHODS: Three platforms were queried for educational plastic surgery podcasts: Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts. Podcast descriptions and episodes were then independently reviewed to determine primary target audiences, performance metrics, and content categories. RESULTS: There were a total of 163 plastic surgery podcasts. 145 of these 163 podcasts were targeted toward a nonmedical audience. The remaining 18 podcasts met inclusion criteria as educational plastic surgery podcasts. Of all educational podcast episodes, 8.8% targeted a medical student audience, 33.8% targeted trainees (residents/fellows), and 57.4% targeted practicing surgeons or emphasized recent research in the field. Episode content categories included breast (14.2%), cosmetic (11.8%), experimental (0.5%), hand/peripheral nerve (8.6%), pediatric/craniofacial (8.2%), reconstructive (15.6%), practice management (14.8%), residency (6.6%), and others (19.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the large number of plastic surgery podcasts available, few podcasts focus on educating a medical audience. Within this small subset, there is a paucity of content targeted towards medical students interested in plastic surgery. While there is a wide breadth of content available, there is significant room for growth and refinement in the podcast sector for plastic surgery education.

Air or Saline? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis on the Effect of Tissue Expander Fill on Complications in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Tissue expander fill medium and volume have implications for the pressure exerted on mastectomy skin flaps. This study evaluated the influence of initial fill medium (air vs. saline) on complications in immediate breast reconstruction within a propensity score-matched cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing immediate tissue expander-based breast reconstruction with initial intraoperative fill with air were propensity score matched 1:2 to those with saline initial fill based on patient and tissue expander characteristics. Incidence of overall and ischemic complications were compared by fill medium (air vs. saline). RESULTS: A total of 584 patients were included, including 130 (22.2%) with initial fill with air, 377 (64.6%) with initial fill with saline, and 77 (13.2%) with 0 cc of initial fill. After multivariate adjustment, higher intraoperative fill volume was associated with increased risk of mastectomy skin flap necrosis [regression coefficient (RC) 15.7; p = 0.049]. Propensity score matching was then conducted among 360 patients (Air: 120 patients vs. Saline: 240 patients). After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the incidences of mastectomy skin flap necrosis, extrusion, reoperation, or readmission between the air and saline cohorts (all p > 0.05). However, initial fill with air was associated with lower incidence of infection requiring oral antibiotics (p = 0.003), seroma (p = 0.004), and nipple necrosis (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Within a propensity score-matched cohort, initial fill with air was associated with a lower incidence of complications, including ischemic complications after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Initial fill with air and lower fill volumes may be strategies to reducing risk of ischemic complications among high-risk patients.

The 5 D's to Dunk the Dog: A Retrospective Clinical Review to Prevent Dog-Ear Contour Abnormalities in Vertical Breast Reductions and Breast Lifts.

Background: In 2020, reduction mammoplasties and mastopexies comprised 34.2% of all breast surgeries performed by plastic surgeons. Various approaches for the skin incision of these procedures have been described. The vertical pattern has become an increasingly popular option due to its lower scar burden. However, it is prone to dog-ear formation along the caudal aspect of the incision. Herein, we describe 5 technical steps to eliminate the dog-ear in patients undergoing vertical mammoplasties. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent vertical breast reduction and mastopexy between the years 2008 and 2020 performed by the senior author. The 5 steps employed in eliminating the dog-ear are delineated and depicted pictorially. Results: A total of 58 patients and 89 breasts were operated upon. A majority of 66.6% were Caucasian, 33.3% were African American, and 1 patient was of Hispanic descent. The mean age was 53.2 years (19-73 years), and average BMI was 31.5 kg/m2 (21.3-42.7 kg/m2). The average resection weights for reduction and mastopexy patients were 479 grams (100-1500 grams) and 58.1 grams (18-100 grams), respectively. Mean follow-up was 10.5 months (1-35 months). Only one patient developed a dog-ear (1.7%) in bilateral breasts (2.2%); however, the patient did not request a revision. Our revision rate over 13 years remained at 0%. Conclusions: Utilizing these 5 technical steps reduces the risk of dog-ear deformity and thereby diminishes the overall need for revisional surgery in patients undergoing short scar vertical mammoplasties.

Breast Implants Save Lives: Gunshot Wound to a Silicone Gel Implant.

What is the incidence of gunshot injuries involving breast implants?What are the considerations for managing a patient with a gunshot wound to a breast implant?Can a breast implant alter the trajectory of a bullet to the chest?What are the considerations for reconstructing a breast after a gunshot wound?

Wine, Honey, and Boiling Oil: A Modern Understanding of Ancient Wound Care Practices.

The origins of wound care date back to ancient civilizations. From boiling oil to honey to wine, healers and caregivers have adopted a fascinating array of items to cleanse, dress, and bandage wounds over the ages. While wound care practices have developed over time, the physicians and surgeons of ancient times and the Middle Ages helped build the foundation for present-day wound care. A modern scientific understanding of these treatments illustrates why practitioners abandoned some practices while others remain in use today.

Red Breast Syndrome: Complete Resolution Following Replacement of Acellular Dermal Matrices With Acellular Collagen Matrices.

What is red breast syndrome (RBS)?What causes RBS?How often do patients present with RBS?What are effective treatments for RBS?

Prevention of Implant Malposition in Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap Breast Reconstruction Using an Acellular Dermal Matrix With Pectoralis Muscle Following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Clinical Review.

Background: Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (LDM) pedicled flaps are a well-established method for breast reconstruction in women with inadequate soft tissue coverage following mastectomy for breast cancer. The robust nature of the latissimus blood supply can accommodate immediate implant placement to increase breast volume; however, a known risk factor with this technique is implant malposition. By utilizing an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in subpectoral implant-based LDM reconstruction, it is hypothesized that patients will experience a lower incidence of implant malposition. This 13-year retrospective review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of breast reconstruction using this technique. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted to identify all patients who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy with a LDM flap, subpectoral implant, and an ADM from 2007 to 2020 by a single surgeon at a single institution. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 40 patients (LDM flaps, N = 51) were identified. Mean participant age was 50.25 ± 9.67 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.85 ± 6.15 kg/m2. Comorbidities included hypertension (40.0%), diabetes mellitus (17.5%), and current smoking (25.0%). Mean follow-up was 31.52 ± 29.51 months. The most common complication was seroma formation (9.8%). No patients experienced implant malposition or flap necrosis. Conclusions: The use of a LDM flap and an ADM in implant-based breast reconstruction are each well described in the literature. This 13-year series supports the efficacy of these techniques utilized in combination to provide an aesthetic result while mitigating implant malposition during breast reconstruction of oncologic patients.

Why Not? Persuading Clinicians to Reduce Overuse.

OBJECTIVE: To explore how best to deimplement nonrecommended medical services, which can result in excess costs and patient harm. METHODS: We conducted telephone interviews with 15 providers at 3 health systems from June 19 to November 21, 2017. Using the case of nonrecommended imaging in patients with cancer, participants assessed the potential for 7 rationales or "arguments," each characterizing overuse in terms of a single problem type (cost or quality) and affected stakeholder group (clinicians, institutions, society, or patients), to convince colleagues to change their practices. We tested rationales for all problem-stakeholder combinations appearing in prior deimplementation studies. RESULTS: Participants' views varied widely. Relatively few found cost arguments powerful, except for patients' out-of-pocket costs. Participants were divided on institution-quality and clinician-quality rationales. Patient-quality rationales resonated strongly with nearly all participants. However, a "yes, but" phenomenon emerged: after initially expressing strong support for a rationale, participants often undercut it with denials or rationalizations. CONCLUSION: Deimplementation efforts should combine multiple rationales appealing to clinicians' diverse perspectives and priorities. In addition, efforts must consider the complex cognitive dynamics that can undercut data and reasoned argumentation.