Simvastatin dose and acute kidney injury without concurrent serious muscle injury: A nationwide nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Inconsistent findings from four observational studies suggest that the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) may increase with increasing statin dose or potency, but none of the studies took statin-related severe muscle injury, including rhabdomyolysis, into account. We undertook a nationwide nested case-control study in New Zealand to examine the risk of AKI without concurrent serious muscle injury according to simvastatin dose in two cohorts: people without a history of renal disease and people with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 334,710 people aged ≥ 18 years without a history of renal disease (cohort 1) and 5,437 with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (cohort 2) who initiated simvastatin therapy between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2013 were identified using national pharmaceutical dispensing and hospital discharge data. Patients who developed AKI without concurrent serious muscle injury during follow-up (cases) were ascertained using hospital discharge and mortality data (n = 931 from cohort 1, n = 160 from cohort 2). Up to 10 controls per case, matched by date of birth, sex, and cohort entry date were randomly selected from the relevant cohort using risk set sampling. RESULTS: Relative to current use of 20mg simvastatin daily, the adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in cohort 1 for current use of 40mg and 80mg were 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2) and 1.3 (95% CI 0.7-2.3), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for 40mg in cohort 2 was 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.9); the numbers taking 80mg were very small and the confidence interval was correspondingly wide. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that a relationship between statin dose and AKI may not exist independent of serious muscle injury.

Demographic and regional disparities in insulin pump utilization in a setting of universal funding: a New Zealand nationwide study.

AIMS: Insulin pumps have been publically funded in New Zealand since 2012 for patients who meet certain clinical criteria; however, the patterns of utilization have not been described. We undertook a nationwide study to estimate the annual proportions of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who used a pump between 2012 and 2014, overall, and according to sex, age, ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and region. METHODS: We used data from the New Zealand Virtual Diabetes Register and routinely collected national demographic, health, and pharmaceutical dispensing data from the Ministry of Health to identify patients with type 1 diabetes and to calculate the overall, and subgroup, proportions using pumps. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2014, funded pump use among patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 13,727) increased from 1.8 to 9.3 % overall; however, there were differences in uptake according to demographic characteristics and region. In 2014, proportionate pump use was significantly higher in females versus males (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.0 [95 % confidence interval 1.8-2.3]), in those aged <20 years, and in some regions. Maori (indigenous people), Pacific, and Asian patients were significantly less likely to use pumps than New Zealand Europeans (ORs 0.30 [0.23-0.41], 0.26 [0.14-0.46], 0.22 [0.14-0.35], respectively), as were those in the most versus the least deprived socioeconomic decile (OR 0.36 [0.25-0.52]). CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to explore the factors driving differential insulin pump uptake, in both New Zealand and elsewhere, if all patients are to have equal opportunity to benefit from intensive diabetes management.