Dental anomalies and their therapeutic implications: retrospective assessment of a frequent finding in patients with cleft lip and palate.

BACKGROUND: Orofacial clefts are characterized by a frequent occurrence of dental anomalies. Numerous studies demonstrate the high prevalence of dental aplasia, supernumerary teeth, and hypoplastic teeth in patients with cleft lip with/without cleft palate (CL/P), yet the therapeutic consequences are rarely discussed. This study explores prevalence, localization, and association between primary and secondary dentition in a large European collective and begins to evaluate the significance of dental anomalies in the therapeutic course of patients with CL/P. METHODS: The medical reports of 1070 patients with different entities of CL/P who presented to our clinic within a 15-year investigation period were evaluated retrospectively. Dental anomalies were classified into three different diagnostic groups: dental aplasia, supernumerary teeth and hypoplastic teeth. The statistical analyses included studies of the frequency and localization of dental anomalies in different cleft entities as well as of the association between primary and secondary dentition and the therapeutic consequences. RESULTS: Uni- or bilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) (47.5%) occurred most frequently, followed by cleft palate only (CPO) (32.9%) and cleft lip with or without alveolus (CL ± A) (19.6%). Dental anomalies were found significantly more often on the side of the cleft. Aplastic permanent teeth were mostly found in patients with CLP (54.8%), while supernumerary permanent teeth occurred primarily in patients with CL ± A (21.7%). Patients with CPO presented dental aplasia but no patient with CPO showed supernumerary teeth. The occurrence of dental aplasia in the primary dentition significantly increases the probability of aplastic teeth in the permanent dentition. Dental anomalies, in particular dental aplasia, significantly increase patients' need for subsequent orthodontic therapy and orthognathic surgery. CONCLUSION: Dental aplasia and hypoplasia are common in patients with CL/P not only in the cleft area but in the whole dentition. In the event of dental aplasia in the primary dentition, the frequency of aplastic teeth in the permanent dentition is significantly higher. Additionally, the need for therapeutic interventions, especially concerning orthognathic surgery, seems to be significantly higher in patients with CL/P who are affected by dental anomalies. Clinicians should take this into account when creating long-term treatment plans.

The Cleft-screen-questionnaire (CSQ) - A validated screening instrument for health-related quality of life in cleft patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to develop and validate a specific screening instrument for assessing the quality of life (QoL) of patients with orofacial clefts. The Cleft-Screen-Questionnaire (CSQ) aims at identifying the main problematic areas and is intended for the routine use in everyday clinical practice to constantly evaluate the conditions' and treatments' effects on patients' well-being. METHODS: First, a pool of 58 questions is created by collecting items from validated questionnaires previously used for assessing the QoL in cleft populations. After the removal of duplicate questions, the questionnaires are answered by 152 patients from a tertiary care center. A factor analysis followed by the calculation of Cronbach's alpha as a reliability measurement led to the final CSQ presented here. RESULTS: The applied factor analysis resulted in five factors. Items showing low factor loadings (seen as <0.5) were excluded initially. Accordingly, factor analysis led to a preliminary number of 43 items. A reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha and corrected alpha if item deleted showed an overall moderate to high reliability (seen as: 0.6-0.9). After excluding questions with increasing alphas if item deleted, analyses yielded in a final number of 38 questions. CONCLUSION: The final 38-item CSQ is a reliable instrument for evaluating the health-related QoL of cleft patients.

Virtual reality in preoperative imaging in maxillofacial surgery: implementation of "the next level"?

Not only are current imaging techniques - cone-beam computed tomography (CT), CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - becoming more precise in capturing data, but the illustration and interpretation of the acquired images is no longer limited to conventional display screens or projectors. The so-called "virtual reality" (VR) glasses have the potential to engage the viewer in a 3-dimensional space, and ultimately to enable evaluation of the reconstructed anatomical structures from a new perspective. For the first time in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS), a 3-dimensional imaging dataset (cone-beam CT, CT, and MRI) can be evaluated by using VR glasses. A medical student, an OMFS resident, and an OMFS consultant rated the preoperative usability of VR glasses to improve the operative understanding of three cases: a deeply impacted wisdom tooth, a fracture of the lower jaw, and an oncological resection. VR glasses seem to help to simplify operations and give the surgeon a good preoperative overview of the intraoperative findings, particularly in the evaluation of impacted teeth and hard tissue structures. In addition, VR glasses seem to be a promising innovation to help in the training of surgical residents and to teach students. However, the more experienced the surgeon, the smaller is the additional value of VR glasses. Preoperative examination using VR glasses can aid better understanding and planning of the surgical site in the future, and is an innovative piece of advanced technology for displaying CT, cone-beam CT, and MRI anatomical data.

Preoperative assessment of the risk of postoperative death in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: a consideration beyond age, sex, and stage of cancer.

Despite improvements in the management of patients in critical care, about 3% patients who have an operation with curative intent for oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) do not survive their stay in hospital. Our aim was to assess the risk factors for postoperative death that were independent of the stage of the cancer, or the age and sex of the patients. We screened 4760 consecutive inpatients at a maxillofacial tertiary care centre from 2011 to 2016, and 34 of them had died within the first three months after operation. We matched them with a further 34 patients with the same TNM stage, age, and sex. General personal and clinical data and preoperative laboratory values were screened, and we applied a Charlson Comorbidity Score (for anaesthetic risk) for each group. Patients' mean (SD) age was 66 (12) years old. There was no significant difference in sex (p=1), age (p=0.718), or TNM classification. Those who died after operation had significantly more renal (p=0.027) and gastrointestinal (p=0.006) diseases, but cardiac diseases (p=0.468) and diabetes mellitus (p=1) were not significant risk factors in themselves. Patients who died postoperatively had significantly worse risk scores (p=0.001) overall. The most common causes of death were septic shock (n=10) and acute cardiac (n=9) or respiratory failure (n=7). Our findings suggested that general diseases were not intrinsically a contraindication for operation with curative intent. The Charlson Comorbidity Score helped to detect potentially fatal courses and could be useful in the preoperative assessment of patients whose general health is not good.

The safety of paediatric dentistry procedures under general anaesthesia. A five-year experience of a tertiary care center.

AIM: Frequently general anaesthesia (GA) is used to treat noncompliant children. Especially in children with morbid diseases general anaesthesia can be a challenging procedure for anaesthetists. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the risks and adverse reactions with a special focus on the impact of existing medication conditions and syndromes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: and methods Records of children up to 10 years of age, who were admitted for paediatric dentistry procedures under GA from January 2011 to December 2016 at the University Hospital of the University of Aachen (Germany), were reviewed. A special attention was paid to the intra- and perioperative critical adverse reactions and concomitant systemic conditions and their impact on treatment outcome. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty patients were admitted for dental restorations. Critical adverse reactions occurred in 4% of the treated patients and they were statistically significantly (p=0.004) related to the ASA classification above II. The use of a laryngeal mask airway was significantly associated (p<0.001) with a shorter duration of surgery. Most common concomitant medical conditions were congenital heart disease, mental retardation and inherited syndromes. CONCLUSION: Although the administration of general anaesthesia in infants and children can be regarded as a safe procedure, clinically significant adverse reactions can occur, especially in patients with an existing medical condition.

Reconstruction of facial soft tissue: comparison between conventional procedures and the facelift technique.

We compared the result of replacement using a modified facelift technique with those of other commonly used surgical techniques for the treatment of defects of the soft tissue of the infraorbital and cheek region. We made a retrospective observational study of 86 patients who had defects of the facial soft tissue after excision of malignant tumours. Procedures used for reconstructions included non-vascularised skin grafts, local flaps, facelift technique, and microvascular free flaps, and we evaluated morbidity; duration of hospital stay; the need for, and duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU); and functional and aesthetic outcomes. We studied 46 men and 40 women (mean (range) age 71 (8-99) years). We found no significant difference between the methods apart from shorter duration of hospital stay and lower incidence of ectropion in the facelift group. The facelift technique also gave the best aesthetic outcome. However, in defects larger than 60cm2, microvascular free tissue transfer was the only choice. The facelift technique is reliable and safe, and gives excellent aesthetic and functional outcomes, but its use is limited to defects smaller than 60cm2.