Clinical evaluation, imaging studies, indications for cytologic study and preprocedural requirements for duct brushing studies and pancreatic fine-needle aspiration: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines.

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology has developed a set of guidelines for pancreaticobiliary cytology including indications for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy, techniques for EUS-FNA, terminology and nomenclature to be used for pancreaticobiliary disease, ancillary testing and postbiopsy management. All documents are based on expertise of the authors, literature review, discussions of the draft document at national and international meetings and synthesis of online comments of the draft document. This document selectively presents the results of these discussions. This document summarizes recommendations for the clinical and imaging work-up of pancreatic and biliary tract lesions along with indications for cytologic study of these lesions. Prebrushing and FNA requirements are also discussed.

Clinical evaluation, imaging studies, indications for cytologic study, and preprocedural requirements for duct brushing studies and pancreatic FNA: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology recommendations for pancreatic and biliary cytology.

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology has developed a set of guidelines for pancreaticobiliary cytology including indications for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy, techniques for EUS-FNA, terminology and nomenclature to be used for pancreaticobiliary disease, ancillary testing, and post-biopsy management. All documents are based on expertise of the authors, literature review, discussions of the draft document at national and international meetings, and synthesis of online comments of the draft document. This document selectively presents the results of these discussions. This document summarizes recommendations for the clinical and imaging work-up of pancreatic and biliary tract lesions along with indications for cytologic study of these lesions. Prebrushing and FNA requirements are also discussed.

Stability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fiducial marker placement for esophageal cancer target delineation and image-guided radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Fiducial markers have been integrated into the management of multiple malignancies to guide more precise delivery of radiation therapy (RT). Fiducials placed at the margins of esophageal tumors are potentially useful to facilitate both RT target delineation and image-guided RT (IGRT). In this study, we report on the stability of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fiducial placement for esophageal cancers and utilization for radiation treatment planning and IGRT. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved database was queried for patients treated for esophageal cancer with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients included in the analysis had a diagnosis of esophageal cancer, were referred for treatment with CRT, and had fiducials placed under EUS guidance. Images acquired at time of radiation treatment planning, daily IGRT imaging, post-treatment restaging, and surveillance scans were analyzed to determine the stability of implanted markers. RESULTS: We identified 60 patients who underwent EUS-guided fiducial marker placement near the margins of their esophageal tumors in preparation for RT treatment planning. A total of 105 fiducial markers were placed. At time of CT simulation, 99 markers were visualized. Fifty-seven patients had post-treatment imaging available for review. Of the 100 implanted fiducials in these 57 patients, 94 (94%) were visible at time of RT simulation. Eighty-eight (88%) fiducials were still present post-treatment imaging at a median of 107 days (range, 33-471 days) after implantation. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided fiducial marker placement for esophageal cancer aids in target delineation for radiation planning and daily IGRT. Fiducial stability is reproducible and facilitates conformal treatment with image-guided RT techniques.

Negative predictive value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the negative predictive value of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in patients with lesions suggestive of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review from January 2005 to August 2008 of all patients who underwent a PET/CT to evaluate a lesion suggestive of pancreatic cancer based on prior imaging. One hundred eighty-four patients underwent PET/CT, of which 60 patients had a negative PET scan. Of these 60 patients, 56 patients (30 women, 26 men) had endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration or surgical pathology for clinical correlation. The Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The negative predictive value of PET/CT was 75%. Eighteen patients had a benign lesion, 24 patients had a premalignant lesion, and 14 patients had a malignant lesion. In the cystic group, 72.4% of the PET/CT-negative lesions were premalignant compared with the solid group that was only 5.9%. This was in contrast to the solid group, where 64.7% was malignant versus 6.9% in the cystic group. Two of 14 patients with malignancy had metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: The negative predictive value of PET/CT in pancreatic lesions suggestive of pancreatic cancer was 75%. A negative PET/CT does not exclude pancreatic cancer, and further workup of these PET-negative lesions is warranted.

Cryoablation of persistent Barrett's epithelium after definitive chemoradiation therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Dysplastic Barrett's epithelium (BE) persists after chemoradiation therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) arising in Barrett's esophagus. This phenomenon may present a significant risk for development of metachronous adenocarcinoma. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and efficacy of endoscopic cryoablation therapy for persistent dysplastic BE in patients with complete clinical response after definitive chemoradiation therapy for EAC. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center experience. PATIENTS: Radiation and endoscopic oncology treatment records were reviewed between January 2004 and September 2009. Fourteen patients with EAC who had been treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy followed by cryoablation were identified. INTERVENTION: Cryoablation therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Reduction in Prague Classification and dysplasia status following cryoablation therapy. Complications reported at 24 hour after the procedure telephone survey and at subsequent endoscopy. RESULTS: After complete clinical response of EAC to chemoradiation therapy, the median length of persistent BE was Prague classification C1M4 (C = circumferential extent, M = maximal extent). Cryoablation reduced the median length of persistent BE to Prague classification C0M1 (P = .009 with respect to circumferential extent and P = .004 with respect to maximal extent of BE). All 14 patients had dysplastic BE. Cryoablation resulted in histological downgrading in all 14 patients. Among patients with high-grade dysplasia, 20% (2/10) were reduced to low-grade dysplasia, 60% (6/10) to BE with no dysplasia, and 20% (2/10) to no BE. Among patients with low-grade dysplasia, 75% (3/4) were reduced to BE with no dysplasia, and 25% (1/4) to no BE. The median number of cryoablation treatments administered to the 14 patients evaluated was 1 (mean 1.5, range 1-5). Eighty-six percent (12/14) of patients reported no complaints during the 24 hours after cryoablation. No occurrences of perforation and no esophageal strictures were reported at surveillance endoscopy. LIMITATIONS: Single-center, retrospective design involving a small number of patients. CONCLUSION: Our observations suggest that cryoablation therapy is safe and effective for the treatment of persistent BE after definitive chemoradiation.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic spray cryotherapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ablation to treat Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) is associated with a decreased incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy (CRYO) demonstrates promising preliminary data. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of CRYO in BE with HGD. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nine academic and community centers; treatment period, 2007 to 2009. PATIENTS: Subjects with HGD confirmed by 2 pathologists. Previous EMR was allowed if residual HGD remained. INTERVENTIONS: CRYO with follow-up biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complete eradication of HGD with persistent low-grade dysplasia, complete eradication of all dysplasia with persistent nondysplastic intestinal metaplasia, and complete eradication of all intestinal metaplasia. RESULTS: Ninety-eight subjects (mean age 65.4 years, 83% male) with BE and HGD (mean length 5.3 cm) underwent 333 treatments (mean 3.4 treatments per subject). There were no esophageal perforations. Strictures developed in 3 subjects. Two subjects reported severe chest pain managed with oral narcotics. One subject was hospitalized for bright red blood per rectum. Sixty subjects had completed all planned CRYO treatments and were included in the efficacy analysis. Fifty-eight subjects (97%) had complete eradication of HGD, 52 (87%) had complete eradication of all dysplasia with persistent nondysplastic intestinal metaplasia, and 34 (57%) had complete eradication of all intestinal metaplasia. Subsquamous BE was found in 2 subjects (3%). LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized, retrospective study with no control group, short follow-up (10.5 months), lack of centralized pathology, and use of surrogate outcome for decreased cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: CRYO is a safe and well-tolerated therapy for BE and HGD. Short-term results suggest that CRYO is highly effective in eradicating HGD.

Does Barrett's esophagus respond to chemoradiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus?

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is frequently associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE). The response of esophageal adenocarcinoma to chemoradiation therapy is well described; however, the effect of chemoradiation on tumor-associated BE has not been specifically reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine the response of tumor-associated BE to chemoradiation therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Care Center experience. PATIENTS: The study cohort consisted of 43 patients with stage I to IVA esophageal adenocarcinoma associated with BE who received either neoadjuvant or definitive chemoradiation therapy and underwent either esophagectomy or surveillance at our institution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The presence and extent of BE after chemoradiation therapy of esophageal adenocarcinoma associated with endoscopically documented pretreatment BE. RESULTS: BE persisted after chemoradiation therapy in 93% (40/43) of cases (95% CI, 83%-99%). Twenty-seven patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy before esophagectomy. Persistent BE was detected in all 27 surgical specimens (100%). In 59% (16/27) of the cases, there was complete pathologic tumor response. Sixteen patients received definitive chemoradiation therapy. Persistent pretreatment BE was identified in 88% (14/16) by surveillance endoscopy (95% CI, 60%-98%). The mean length of BE before and after chemoradiation was 6.6 cm and 5.8 cm, respectively (P = .38). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, small sample size, and single-site data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoradiation therapy of esophageal adenocarcinoma does not eliminate tumor-associated BE, nor does it affect the length of the BE segment.

Successful completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection for esophageal cancer after perforation: a case for endoscopic stenting.

Iatrogenic esophageal perforation during endoscopy in the setting of malignancy is an uncommon but often devastating complication and presents a formidable challenge to the surgeon. We sought to determine the efficacy of a self-expanding plastic stent for esophageal perforation before neoadjuvant chemoradiation in a single patient. A 74-year-old woman with a T4N0 adenocarcinoma at the gastroesophageal junction was perforated during upper endoscopy. We elected to manage the perforation with a silicone-covered, self-expanding Polyflex stent. Subsequent studies revealed good positioning of the stent with exclusion of the perforation from the esophageal lumen. The patient subsequently underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with cisplatin, 5-flourouracil, and external beam radiation (2640 Gy) followed by minimally invasive, hand-assisted transhiatal esophagogastrectomy. We describe the first case of endoscopic stenting for locally advanced, perforated esophageal cancer for the purposes of administering neoadjuvant chemoradiation as a bridge to definitive surgery. This patient was able to resume oral nutrition after stenting and during neoadjuvant therapy, experiencing no major complications from chemoradiation. Chemoradiation does not necessarily preclude the use of endoscopically placed covered plastic esophageal stents as a bridge to resection, even in the face of iatrogenic perforation.

Interdisciplinary management of an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is less common than classic invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas but is being diagnosed with greater frequency since its clinicopathologic features are now clearly defined. Often multifocal in its existence along the pancreatic duct, IPMN is associated with a significant risk for recurrence and warrants vigilant surveillance, even after a margin-negative resection. METHODS: The authors present a case highlighting important features in the diagnosis, workup, and management of IPMN. They also review existing literature highlighting epidemiology, findings of molecular studies, and current treatment recommendations. RESULTS: Physicians and patients must carefully weigh the risks and benefits associated with treatment options. Limited resection in a patient with a high likelihood of multifocal disease preserves pancreatic parenchyma and reduces the risk of developing pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency. Though the risk of developing invasive cancer in the remnant is small, the prognosis is worse if it does develop. Conversely, total pancreatectomy eliminates the risk of future malignancy but involves life-long insulin and exogenous pancreatic enzyme dependence and significant associated morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Decision making for effective treatment of IPMN is complex and requires attention to detail by an interdisciplinary team with experience in the diagnosis and management of these tumors. Treatment must be individualized based on patient life expectancy in terms of remaining years and overall quality. Molecular profiling of these lesions may allow for more precise tailoring of treatment in the future.

Management of persistent gastroesophageal anastomotic strictures with removable self-expandable polyester silicon-covered (Polyflex) stents: an alternative to serial dilation.

BACKGROUND: A benign gastroesophageal anastomotic stricture occurs in up to 42% of patients after transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Management of anastomotic strictures may require extended periods of serial endoscopic dilation, with significant risk, cost, and inconvenience for the patient. OBJECTIVE: To determine if placement of removable self-expandable polyester silicon-covered (Polyflex) stents (SEPSs) prolonged the interval between endoscopic interventions in the management of persistent anastomotic stricture. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National Cancer Institute designated comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS: Eight patients after a transhiatal esophagectomy referred for management of benign persistent anastomotic strictures. INTERVENTIONS: Serial balloon and bougie dilations and SEPS placement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The interval between endoscopic interventions and the number of endoscopic interventions before and after SEPS placement. RESULTS: Over a 365-day period, 13 SEPS were placed in 8 patients with benign persistent anastomotic strictures after a transhiatal esophagectomy. A SEPS placement delayed the interval between endoscopic interventions from a mean of 7 days before stent insertion to 62 days after insertion (P < .008). The median number of preinsertion interventions was 4 and was reduced to 1 after insertion (P < .005). LIMITATION: The small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: A SEPS placement did not result in stricture resolution or stabilization after SEPS removal. The SEPS migration rate was much higher in our patients with postesophagectomy anastomotic strictures than previously reported for other types of strictures. However, a SEPS placement did significantly delay the interval between endoscopic interventions in patients with persistent gastroesophageal anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy. SEPS placement should be considered as an alternative to continued serial dilation in patients with persistent anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy.