Clinical usefulness of the Parkinson's disease sleep scale.

OBJECTIVE: To test the usefulness of the Parkinson's disease sleep scale (PDSS) in identifying sleep disorders in the clinical practice setting. METHODS: Sixty-two PD patients were evaluated with the PDSS and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). A cut-off of less than five for each PDSS item as an indicator of substantial sleep disturbance was chosen. If the ESS was equal to or greater than eight, patients were referred to a sleep disorder specialist and possible polysomnography. RESULTS: The mean total PDSS score was 104.7+/-21.5,which correlated with the mean Hoehn and Yahr score (1.9+/-0.9) as well as the mean ESS score (9.7+/-4.7). A significant correlation was also found between the ESS score and several items of the PDSS. CONCLUSIONS: The PDSS was useful in identifying sleep disturbances which were not previously diagnosed, such as sleep maintenance insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness. Problems with the PDSS include ambiguities of some questions, lack of quantification and an inability to identify specific sleep disturbances such as sleep apnea.

Sleep disorders. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, restless legs syndrome, and insomnia in geriatric patients.

Sleep disorders may affect one out of two older Americans and may present as insomnia, excessive daytime sleepiness, or both. Age-related changes seem to cause a decreased need for sleep. The average 70-year-old sleeps only 6 hours a night, but may obtain an additional hour or even 2 during daytime naps. Older adults also experience an increase in the number of sleep disruptions and an increased incidence of chronic diseases, which can contribute to poorer sleep in this group. The two most common geriatric sleep disorders are obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and restless legs syndrome. Detailed diagnostic workup and treatment are usually referred to a center for sleep medicine where polysomnographic studies are performed. Left untreated, sleep disorders may present a serious threat to the patient's health and lead to increased morbidity and mortality.

Therapeutic efficacy of an oral appliance in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a 2-year follow-up.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of an oral appliance, the Karwetzky activator, on respiratory and sleep parameters in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Those selected for this study were 26 patients polysomnographically diagnosed with mild-to-moderate OSA. They were initially treated successfully with this appliance, as documented by a second polysomnographic study after 6 to 12 weeks. Further polysomnographic registrations 6 to 12 months and 18 to 24 months later were performed for each patient wearing the appliance. For 21 patients (81%), therapeutic efficacy was maintained; 5 patients (19%) showed a deterioration in respiratory parameters. We corrected this by adjusting the device in 2 patients. The mean apnea-hypopnea index decreased significantly from 17.8 events per hour at the baseline registration to 4.2 events per hour (P <.001) after 6 to 12 weeks of treatment. After 6 to 12 months, the apnea-hypopnea index was 8.2 events per hour. The index remained at this level 18 to 24 months later, with 8.3 events per hour. Mean oxygen saturation was not improved with the activator, but the number of desaturations had decreased at the 6-to-12 week review. Again, the improvement declined with time, but the number of oxygen desaturations was still significantly decreased at 18 to 24 months (P <.01). Although the respiratory parameters remained statistically improved throughout the study (P <.01), sleep architecture did not change statistically. In most patients, therapeutic efficacy was maintained at the 2-year follow-up, although there was a tendency for effectiveness to fall over time. We concluded that the Karwetzky activator may be an effective treatment alternative for patients with mild-to-moderate OSA, but therapy requires diligent and regular polysomnographic follow-ups. Further long-term studies are needed to assess the continued efficacy of this oral appliance in treating OSA.