Management of Patients With Unexplained Syncope: Derivation and Validation of a Simplified 2-Step Diagnostic Approach.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a structured 2-step approach, based on noninvasive diagnostic criteria, that led to an electrophysiology study in patients with unexplained syncope. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two independent cohorts were used: the derivation cohort with 665 patients based on electronic health record data to develop our 2-step diagnostic approach, and the validation cohort based on 160 prospectively screened patients, presenting with unexplained syncope episodes. Noninvasive electrocardiographic and imaging markers and an electrophysiology study-based invasive assessment were combined. A positive diagnostic approach according to our study's prespecified criteria resulted in a decision to proceed with a permanent pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The primary end point was the time until the event of recurrent syncope (syncope-free survival). Number needed to treat was calculated for patients with a positive diagnostic approach. The number of patients with unexplained syncope and borderline sinus bradycardia needed to treat was 5, and the number of patients with unexplained syncope and bundle branch block needed to treat was 3 over a mean follow-up of ≈4 years. After the structured 2-step approach, the primary outcome occurred in 14 of 82 (17.1%) with a pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and 19 of 57 (33%) with a negative approach, with a mean follow-up of ≈2.5 years (29.29±12.58 months, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The low number needed to treat in the derivation cohort and the low percentage of syncope recurrence in the validation cohort supports the proposed 2-step electrophysiology-inclusive algorithm as a potentially low-cost, 1-day, structured tool for these patients.

Electrocardiographic Characteristics, Identification, and Management of Frequent Premature Ventricular Contractions.

Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. The association of PVCs with adverse cardiovascular outcomes is well established in the context of structural heart disease, yet not so much in the absence of structural heart disease. However, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) seems to contribute prognostically in the latter subgroup. PVC-induced myocardial dysfunction refers to the impairment of ventricular function due to PVCs and is mostly associated with a PVC burden > 10%. Surface 12-lead ECG has long been used to localize the anatomic site of origin and multiple algorithms have been developed to differentiate between right ventricular and left ventricular outflow tract (RVOT and LVOT, respectively) origin. Novel algorithms include alternative ECG lead configurations and, lately, sophisticated artificial intelligence methods have been utilized to determine the origins of outflow tract arrhythmias. The decision to therapeutically address PVCs should be made upon the presence of symptoms or the development of PVC-induced myocardial dysfunction. Therapeutic modalities include pharmacological therapy (I-C antiarrhythmic drugs and beta blockers), as well as catheter ablation, which has demonstrated superior efficacy and safety.