Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg ; 21(3): 865-869, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36274881

RESUMO

Background: Locoregional recurrence of oral cancer causes significant morbidity. This study aims at assessing the functional outcomes of patients undergoing treatment for recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: This study was done in a tertiary care center in North India and includes prospective cohort of 179 recurrent oral carcinoma patients, from September 2017 to September 2018. Patients undergoing treatment of recurrent oral carcinoma were assessed for quality-of-life score at baseline before starting treatment and two months after the completion of the treatment. For the assessment, EORTC QLQH&N35 questionnaire was used. Results: Of 179 patients included, 71 (39.66%) patients underwent salvage surgery and 104 patients (58.10%) received palliative chemotherapy. One hundred and thirty patients could complete the "EORTC-QOL-H&N-35" questionnaire on required two occasions. Forty-nine patients died before completing second questionnaire. More than half (55.6%) of patients who underwent salvage surgery had improved quality of life after the procedures. They have little or no pain in oral cavity, improved swallowing, less odynophagia, improvement in neck and shoulder pain, less problems with the external appearance and socialization, and enjoyed better sexual life. In patients receiving palliative chemotherapy, the quality of life declined in majority (88.1%) of the patients. Conclusions: Although salvage surgery is the best modality of treatment for recurrent oral carcinoma, only about one-third of patients qualify for surgery and enjoy improved quality of life following surgery. On the other hand, in majority of the patients receiving palliative chemotherapy, the quality of life worsened with time and treatment.

2.
J Clin Transl Hepatol ; 10(1): 120-127, 2022 Feb 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35233380

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver enzyme abnormalities in coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) are being addressed in the literature. The predictive risk of elevated liver enzymes has not been established for COVID-19 mortality. In this study, we hypothesized that elevated liver enzymes at admission can predict the outcome of COVID-19 disease with other known indicators, such as comorbidities. METHODS: This retrospective study included all the consecutive hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 disease from March 4th to May 31st, 2020. The study was conducted in Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. We assessed demography, clinical variables, COVID-19 severity, laboratory parameters, and outcome. RESULTS: We included 1,512 patients, and median age was 47 years (interquartile range: 34-60) with 36.9% being female. Liver enzyme level (aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase) was elevated in 450/1,512 (29.76%) patients. Comorbidity was present in 713/1,512 (47.16%) patients. Patients with liver enzymes' elevation and presence of comorbidity were older, more frequently hospitalized in ICU and had more severe symptoms of COVID-19 at the time of admission. Presence of liver enzymes' elevation with comorbidity was a high risk factor for death (OR: 5.314, 95% CI: 2.278-12.393), as compared to patients with presence of comorbidity (OR: 4.096, 95% CI: 1.833-9.157). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity combined with liver enzymes' elevation at presentation independently increased the risk of death in COVID-19 by at least 5-fold.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...