Increasing contribution of integrated forms to total HIV DNA in blood during HIV disease progression from primary infection.

BACKGROUND: In the current context of research on HIV reservoirs, offering new insights into the persistence of HIV DNA in infected cells, which prevents viral eradication, may aid in identifying cure strategies. This study aimed to describe the establishment of stable integrated forms among total HIV DNA during primary infection (PHI) and their dynamics during the natural history of infection. METHODS: Total and integrated HIV DNA were quantified in blood from 74 PHI patients and 97 recent seroconverters (<12 months following infection, "progression cohort"). The evolution of both markers over six years was modelled (mixed-effect linear models). Their predictive values for disease progression were studied (Cox models). FINDINGS: For most patients during PHI, stable integrated forms were a minority among total HIV DNA (median: 12%) and became predominant thereafter (median at AIDS stage: 100%). Both total and integrated HIV DNA increased over a six-year period. Patients from the progression cohort who reached clinical AIDS during follow-up (n = 34) exhibited higher total and integrated HIV DNA levels at seroconversion and a higher percentage of integrated forms than did slower progressors (n = 63) (median: 100% vs 44%). The integrated HIV DNA load was strongly associated with the risk of developing AIDS (aRR = 2.63, p = 0.002). INTERPRETATION: The profile of "rapid" or "slower" progression in the natural history of HIV infection appears to be determined early in the course of HIV infection. The strong predominance of unstable unintegrated forms in PHI may explain the great benefit of this early treatment, which induces a sharp decrease in total HIV DNA. FUND: French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis.

Current state of and needs for hepatitis B screening: results of a large screening study in a low-prevalent, metropolitan region.

BACKGROUND: In low hepatitis B virus (HBV)-prevalent countries, most HBV-infected persons are unaware of their status. We aimed to evaluate whether (i) previous HBV-testing, (ii) physicians decision to screen, and (iii) CDC's recommendations identified infected individuals and which risk-factor groups needing testing. METHODS: During a mass, multi-center HBV-screening study from September 2010-August 2011, 3929 participants were screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HBs and anti-Hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBcAb). Questions on HBV risk-factors and testing practices were asked to participants, while participants' eligibility for HBV-testing was asked to study medical professionals. RESULTS: 85 (2.2%) participants were HBsAg-positive, while 659 (16.8%) had either resolved HBV infection or isolated anti-HBcAb. When comparing practices, HBV-testing was more likely to occur in HBV-infected participants if Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations were used (Sensitivity = 100%, 95%CI: 95.8-100) than physicians' discretion (Sensitivity = 87.1%, 95%CI: 78.0-93.4) or previous HBV-test (Sensitivity = 36.5%, 95%CI: 26.3-47.6) (p<0.0001). Nevertheless, many non-infected individuals would still have been screened using CDC-recommendations (Specificity = 31.1%, 95%CI: 29.6-32.6). Using multivariable logistic regression, HBsAg-positive status was significantly associated with the following: males, originating from high HBV-endemic region, contact with HBV-infected individual, without national healthcare, and intravenous-drug user (IDU). Of these risk-factors, physician's discretion for testing HBV was not significantly associated with participants' geographical origin or IDU. CONCLUSIONS: Missed opportunities of HBV-screening are largely due to underestimating country of origin as a risk-factor. Applying CDC-recommendations could improve HBV-screening, but with the disadvantage of many tests. Further development of HBV-testing strategies is necessary, especially before severe disease occurs.

Performance of rapid tests for detection of HBsAg and anti-HBsAb in a large cohort, France.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The systematic use of rapid tests performed at points-of-care may facilitate hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening and substantially increase HBV infection awareness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of such tests for HBsAg and anti-HBsAb detection among individuals visiting a variety of healthcare centers located in a low HBV-prevalent area. METHODS: Three rapid tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) detection (VIKIA, Determine and Quick Profile) and one test for anti-hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBsAb) detection (Quick Profile) were evaluated in comparison to ELISA serology. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) and area under the ROC curve were used to estimate test performance. Non-inferiority criteria of the joint Se, Sp were set at 0.80, 0.95. RESULTS: Among the 3956 subjects screened, 85 (2.1%) were HBsAg-positive and 2225 (56.5%) had a protective anti-HBsAb titer. Test Se and Sp (lower bound of 97.5% CI) were as follows: 96.5% (89.0%), 99.9% (99.8%) for Vikia; 93.6% (80.7%), 100.0% (99.8%) for Determine; and 90.5% (80.8%), 99.7% (99.5%) for Quick Profile; with all three tests achieving minimal non-inferiority criteria. False negatives were typically observed in inactive HBsAg carriers. The anti-HBsAb Quick Profile test had excellent specificity (97.8%) and PPV (97.8%) albeit low sensitivity (58.3%), thus failing to establish non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: All three HBsAg rapid tests could be considered ideal for HBV screening in low HBV-prevalent countries, given the ease of use, rapidity, and high classification probabilities. The anti-HBsAb Quick Profile could be considered reliable only for positive tests.

Early levels of HIV-1 DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells are predictive of disease progression independently of HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ T cell counts.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this work was to assess the role of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reservoirs in the risk of disease progression, by studying the relationship between HIV DNA level in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and progression toward acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). METHODS: HIV-1 DNA levels in PBMCs were determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction for 383 patients enrolled in the SEROCO Cohort Study who had experienced seroconversion and had been followed up for >8 years. We compared the predictive values of HIV DNA level, HIV RNA level, and CD4+ cell count. RESULTS: Between 6 and 24 months after seroconversion, HIV DNA level was a major predictor of progression to AIDS independently of HIV RNA level and CD4+ T cell count (adjusted relative risk [RR] for a 1-log(10) increase, 3.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.70-6.00]). HIV DNA level was also a major predictor of disease progression during the first 6 months after seroconversion (adjusted RR, 4.16 [95% CI, 1.70-10.21]), when HIV RNA level and CD4+ T cell count were less predictive. Thus, a combination of these 3 markers provides the best estimate of the risk of disease progression for each patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that HIV DNA level could be a useful additional marker in clinical practice and could aid in helping to define the best time to initiate treatment for each patient.