Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 34(6): 557-65, 2016 Feb 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26644527

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There is growing interest to enhance symptom monitoring during routine cancer care using patient-reported outcomes, but evidence of impact on clinical outcomes is limited. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients receiving routine outpatient chemotherapy for advanced solid tumors at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to report 12 common symptoms via tablet computers or to receive usual care consisting of symptom monitoring at the discretion of clinicians. Those with home computers received weekly e-mail prompts to report between visits. Treating physicians received symptom printouts at visits, and nurses received e-mail alerts when participants reported severe or worsening symptoms. The primary outcome was change in health-related quality of life (HRQL) at 6 months compared with baseline, measured by the EuroQol EQ-5D Index. Secondary endpoints included emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations, and survival. RESULTS: Among 766 patients allocated, HRQL improved among more participants in the intervention group than usual care (34% v 18%) and worsened among fewer (38% v 53%; P < .001). Overall, mean HRQL declined by less in the intervention group than usual care (1.4- v 7.1-point drop; P < .001). Patients receiving intervention were less frequently admitted to the ER (34% v 41%; P = .02) or hospitalized (45% v 49%; P = .08) and remained on chemotherapy longer (mean, 8.2 v 6.3 months; P = .002). Although 75% of the intervention group was alive at 1 year, 69% with usual care survived the year (P = .05), with differences also seen in quality-adjusted survival (mean of 8.7 v. 8.0 months; P = .004). Benefits were greater for participants lacking prior computer experience. Most patients receiving intervention (63%) reported severe symptoms during the study. Nurses frequently initiated clinical actions in response to e-mail alerts. CONCLUSION: Clinical benefits were associated with symptom self-reporting during cancer care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Autorrelato , Avaliação de Sintomas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Correio Eletrônico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 106(9)2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25265940

RESUMO

The standard approach for documenting symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer clinical trials involves investigator reporting using the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Because this approach underdetects symptomatic AEs, the NCI issued two contracts to create a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement system as a companion to the CTCAE, called the PRO-CTCAE. This Commentary describes development of the PRO-CTCAE by a group of multidisciplinary investigators and patient representatives and provides an overview of qualitative and quantitative studies of its measurement properties. A systematic evaluation of all 790 AEs listed in the CTCAE identified 78 appropriate for patient self-reporting. For each of these, a PRO-CTCAE plain language term in English and one to three items characterizing the frequency, severity, and/or activity interference of the AE were created, rendering a library of 124 PRO-CTCAE items. These items were refined in a cognitive interviewing study among patients on active cancer treatment with diverse educational, racial, and geographic backgrounds. Favorable measurement properties of the items, including construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, and between-mode equivalence, were determined prospectively in a demographically diverse population of patients receiving treatments for many different tumor types. A software platform was built to administer PRO-CTCAE items to clinical trial participants via the internet or telephone interactive voice response and was refined through usability testing. Work is ongoing to translate the PRO-CTCAE into multiple languages and to determine the optimal approach for integrating the PRO-CTCAE into clinical trial workflow and AE analyses. It is envisioned that the PRO-CTCAE will enhance the precision and patient-centeredness of adverse event reporting in cancer clinical research.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Autorrelato , Terminologia como Assunto , Humanos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
3.
J Clin Oncol ; 31(20): 2580-5, 2013 Jul 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23733753

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used in routine outpatient cancer care to guide clinical decisions and enhance communication. Prior evidence suggests good patient compliance with reporting at scheduled clinic visits, but there is limited evidence about compliance with long-term longitudinal reporting between visits. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving chemotherapy for lung, gynecologic, genitourinary, or breast cancer at a tertiary cancer center, with access to a home computer and prior e-mail experience, were asked to self-report seven symptomatic toxicities via the Web between visits. E-mail reminders were sent to participants weekly; patient-reported high-grade toxicities triggered e-mail alerts to nurses; printed reports were provided to oncologists at visits. A priori threshold criteria were set to determine if this data collection approach merited further development based on monthly (≥ 75% participants reporting at least once per month on average) and weekly compliance rates (60% at least once per week). RESULTS: Between September 2006 and November 2010, 286 patients were enrolled (64% were women; 88% were white; median age, 58 years). Mean follow-up was 34 weeks (range, 2 to 214). On average, monthly compliance was 83%, and weekly compliance was 62%, without attrition until the month before death. Greater compliance was associated with older age and higher education but not with performance status. Compliance was greatest during the initial 12 weeks. Symptomatic illness and technical problems were rarely barriers to compliance. CONCLUSION: Monthly compliance with home Web reporting was high, but weekly compliance was lower, warranting strategies to enhance compliance in routine care settings.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Internet/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Autorrelato , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Institutos de Câncer , Estudos de Coortes , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias/patologia , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
4.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 101(23): 1624-32, 2009 Dec 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19920223

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In cancer treatment trials, the standard source of adverse symptom data is clinician reporting by use of items from the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Patient self-reporting has been proposed as an additional data source, but the implications of such a shift are not understood. METHODS: Patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy and their clinicians independently reported six CTCAE symptoms and Karnofsky Performance Status longitudinally at sequential office visits. To compare how patient's vs clinician's reports relate to sentinel clinical events, a time-dependent Cox regression model was used to measure associations between reaching particular CTCAE grade severity thresholds with the risk of death and emergency room visits. To measure concordance of CTCAE reports with indices of daily health status, Kendall tau rank correlation coefficients were calculated for each symptom with EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire and global question scores. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were enrolled for an average of 12 months (range = 1-28 months), with a mean of 11 visits and 67 (41%) deaths. CTCAE reports were submitted by clinicians at 95% of visits and by patients at 80% of visits. Patients generally reported symptoms earlier and more frequently than clinicians. Statistically significant associations with death and emergency room admissions were seen for clinician reports of fatigue (P < .001), nausea (P = .01), constipation (P = .038), and Karnofsky Performance Status (P < .001) but not for patient reports of these items. Higher concordance with EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire and global question scores was observed for patient-reported symptoms than for clinician-reported symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinally collected clinician CTCAE assessments better predict unfavorable clinical events, whereas patient reports better reflect daily health status. These perspectives are complementary, each providing clinically meaningful information. Inclusion of both types of data in treatment trial results and drug labels appears to be warranted.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Constipação Intestinal/induzido quimicamente , Constipação Intestinal/diagnóstico , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Morte , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Náusea/diagnóstico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Clin Oncol ; 25(34): 5374-80, 2007 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18048818

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In cancer treatment trials, clinicians traditionally report patient toxicity symptoms. Alternatively, patients could provide this information directly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is the mandated instrument for tracking patient toxicity symptoms in National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored cancer treatment trials. We adapted CTCAE symptom items into patient language and uploaded these to an online platform. Lung cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy were invited to self-report selected symptoms at visits via waiting area computers or optional home access. Symptom reports were printed for nurses at visits, but no instructions were given with regard to use of this information. RESULTS: From June 2005 through March 2006, 125 patients were invited to participate, and 107 chose to enroll. Mean length of participation was 42 weeks (range, 1 to 71 weeks), by which time 35% died. The average number of clinic visits was 12 (range, 1 to 40 visits). At each consecutive visit, most patients (mean, 78%) logged in without significant attrition. Reasons for failure to log in included having no reminder and having inadequate time. Although 76% of enrollees had home computers, only 15% self-reported from home. Satisfaction with the system was high (90%), but only 51% felt communication was improved. All participating nurses understood the reports and felt this information was useful for clinical decisions, documentation, and discussions. However, only one of seven nurses discussed reports with patients frequently, with insufficient time being the most common barrier to discussions. CONCLUSION: Online patient self-reporting is a feasible long-term strategy for toxicity symptom monitoring during chemotherapy, even among patients with advanced cancer and high symptom burdens. However, without explicit reminders and clinician feedback, patients demonstrated limited voluntary interest in self-reporting between visits.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Sistemas On-Line , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 14(3): 264-8, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17329732

RESUMO

The current mechanism for monitoring toxicity symptoms in cancer trials depends on a complex paper-based process. Electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may be more efficient and accurate. An online PRO platform was created including a simple data entry interface, real-time report generation, and an alert system to e-mail clinicians when patients self-report serious toxicities. Feasibility assessment involving 180 chemotherapy patients demonstrated high levels of use at up to 40 follow-up clinic visits per patient over 16 months (85% of patients at any given visit), with high levels of patient and clinician acceptance and satisfaction (>95%). Alerts were used as the basis for delayed chemotherapy treatments, dose modifications, and scheduling changes. These results demonstrate that online patient-reporting is a feasible strategy for chemotherapy toxicity symptom monitoring, and may improve safety and satisfaction with care. Ongoing multi-center research will evaluate the impact of this approach on clinical and administrative outcomes.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Sistemas On-Line , Autocuidado , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Correio Eletrônico , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Internet , Satisfação do Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Interface Usuário-Computador
7.
Lancet Oncol ; 7(11): 903-9, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17081915

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) are used as standard practice in trials of cancer treatments by clinicians to elicit and report toxic effects. Alternatively, patients could report this information directly as patient-reported outcomes, but the accuracy of these reports compared with clinician reports remains unclear. We aimed to compare the reporting of symptom severity reported by patients and clinicians. METHODS: Between March and May, 2005, a questionnaire with 11 common CTCAE symptoms was given to consecutive outpatients and their clinicians (physicians and nurses) in lung and genitourinary cancer clinics in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Patients completed a version that used language adapted from the CTCAE for patient self-reporting. The results from the questionnaire were compared with clinician reporting of the same symptoms. FINDINGS: Of 435 patients and their clinicians asked to take part in the study, 400 paired surveys were completed. For most symptoms, agreement between patient and clinician was high, and most discrepancies were within a grade difference of one point. Agreement was higher for symptoms that could be observable directly, such as vomiting and diarrhoea, than for more subjective symptoms, such as fatigue and dyspnoea. Differences in symptom reporting rarely would have changed treatment decisions or dosing, and patients assigned greater severity to symptoms more than did clinicians. No significant differences were recorded between the results when the questionnaire was completed by the patient before or after the clinician. INTERPRETATION: Patient reporting of symptoms could add to the current approach to symptom monitoring in cancer treatment trials. Future research should assess the effect of self reporting on clinical outcomes and efficiency, and the use of real-time collection of patient-reported outcomes for early detection of potentially serious adverse events.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Pacientes , Médicos , Neoplasias Urogenitais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Projetos de Pesquisa , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...