Postoperative evaluation of tibial footprint and tunnels characteristics after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomic aimers.

Following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts, 38 consecutive patients were evaluated with high-speed three-dimensional computed tomography. Scans were performed within 3 days following surgery. The length and width of the reconstructed ACL footprint were measured on axial images. Then, 3D images were converted into 2D with radiologic density for measurement purposes. Tunnel orientation was measured on AP and lateral views. In the sagittal plane, the center of the anteromedial (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) tibial attachment positions was calculated as the ratio between the geometric insertion sites with respect to the sagittal diameter of the tibia. In addition, the length from the anterior tibial plateau to the retro-eminence ridge was measured; the relationship of this line with the centers of the AM and PL tunnels was then measured. The AP length of the reconstructed footprint was 17.1 mm ± 1.9 mm and the width 7.3 mm ± 1.2 m. The distance from retro-eminence ridge to center of AM tunnel was 18.8 mm ± 2.8 mm, and the distance from RER to center of PL tunnel was 8.7 mm ± 2.6 mm. The distance between tunnels center was 10.1 mm ± 1.7 mm. There were no significant differences between the intra- and inter-observer measurements. The bone bridge thickness was 2.1 mm ± 0.8 mm. In the sagittal plane, the centers of the tunnel apertures were located at 35.7% ± 6.7% and 53.7% ± 6.8% of the tibia diameter for the AMB and PLB, respectively. The surface areas of the tunnel apertures were 46.3 mm(2) ± 4.4 mm(2) and 36.3 mm(2) ± 4.0 mm(2) for the AM and PL tunnels, respectively. The total surface area occupied by both tunnels was 82.6 mm(2) ± 7.0 mm(2). In the coronal plane, tunnel orientation showed the AM tunnel was more vertical than the PL tunnel with a 10° divergence (14.8° vs. 24.1°). In the sagittal plane, both tunnels were almost parallel (29.9° and 25.4° for the AM and PL tunnels, respectively). When using anatomic aimers, the morphometric parameters of the reconstructed tibial footprint in terms of length and distances to the surrounding bony landmarks were similar to the native ACL tibial footprint. However, the native footprint width was not restored, and the surface area of the two tunnel apertures was in the lower range of the published values for the native footprint area.

Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomic aimers.

Graft positioning is a key issue in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and even more sensitive in double-bundle reconstruction, where 2 tunnels have to be drilled within the ACL footprints at both the femoral and tibial insertion sites. Specific ancillary instruments have been developed to facilitate the positioning of the 4 sockets necessary when performing anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. This technical note describes the rationale and the step-by-step method of using the specific aimers developed for this purpose. However, a prerequisite for successful double-bundle ACL reconstruction is a good knowledge of ACL footprint anatomy.

Influence of knee flexion angle on femoral tunnel characteristics when drilled through the anteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of knee flexion angle for drilling the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via the anteromedial (AM) portal on resulting tunnel orientation and length. METHODS: In 8 fresh cadaveric knees, the ACL was excised and 2.4-mm guidewires were drilled through the AM bundle footprint using a 5-mm endofemoral aimer via the AM portal. We compared knee flexion angles of 90 degrees , 110 degrees , 130 degrees , and maximum flexion. Anteroposterior-, lateral-, and tunnel-view radiographs were measured to determine tunnel orientation, o'clock position, and direct measurement to determine intra-osseous tunnel length. RESULTS: With regard to tunnel orientation, each increase in knee flexion angle resulted in significantly more horizontal tunnel both on the anteroposterior view and on the lateral view. While on the tunnel view, the pin became more vertical with knee flexion. At 90 degrees , tunnel length was significantly less (27 +/- 9 mm) than at greater angles, and the guidewires were either resting against the posterior cortex or breaching it. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show the knee flexion angle influences the position of the femoral drilling. It appears in the current study that 110 degrees is optimum, while the 90 degrees pin leads to short tunnel and is so close to the posterior wall there are high risks of posterior wall blow out when drilling the tunnel at its final diameter. Also, 130 degrees of knee flexion is responsible for high tunnel acuity and, finally, maximum flexion being quite variable from one specimen to another cannot be recommended. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tunnels drilled through the AM portal at 90 degrees are at risk of back wall blow out.