Return rate following a live birth obtained with ART: frequency and determinants.

PURPOSE: To understand how often couples return to ART centres for a second child. METHODS: Retrospective monocentric cohort study including women who had a first live birth with IVF. The primary objective was to assess the rate of those returning for a second child within five years of the previous pregnancy. The secondary aim was to disentangle the determinants of this rate. RESULTS: A total of 374 patients were included, of whom 188 returned (50%, 95% CI 45-55%). Among those who did not return (n = 186), four (2%) referred to another ART Center and 24 were unreachable. Of the 158 contacted subjects that did not refer for ART, 53 (34%, 95% CI 27-41%) conceived naturally, 57 (36%, 95% CI 29-44%) abandoned their intent of parenthood, and 48 (30%, 95% CI 24-38%) unsuccessfully attempted natural conception. These 48 women (13%) who expressed interest in a second child but did not undergo ART were compared to those seeking a second pregnancy through ART. Baseline characteristics were similar except for an older age (Median 36, IQR: 34-38 vs 34, IQR: 32-36, p = 0.001). Additionally, in terms of IVF cycle characteristics, women who did not return were more likely to achieve their first pregnancy with a fresh transfer rather than a frozen transfer (75% vs 59%, p = 0.05). They also had a higher number of retrieved oocytes (Median 10, IQR: 7-13 vs 9, IQR: 5-12) and less frequently cryopreserved embryos (27% vs 52%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The proportion of couples who have conceived with ART and who are interested in having a second child is high. Our results underline the importance of paying more attention to the number of intended children, as this information could influence clinical management.

Low ovarian reserve and risk of miscarriage in pregnancies derived from assisted reproductive technology.

STUDY QUESTION: Do low levels of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) or antral follicle count (AFC) properly predict miscarriage in young women conceiving with ART? SUMMARY ANSWER: Low ovarian reserve, as indicated by AMH or AFC, is not associated with miscarriage in young women conceiving with ART. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Presently, the impact of low ovarian reserve on the risk of miscarriage remains controversial. Some studies have reported an association between serum AMH levels and AFC and miscarriage, but others have failed to confirm these findings. The main limitation that undermines the reliability and consistency of the results is the confounding effect of female age. Indeed, after 35 years of age, on the one hand, the risk of miscarriage starts increasing because of impaired oocyte quality while, on the other, the physiological decline in AMH and AFC levels continues, thus hampering the possibility to properly explore the real effects of reduced ovarian reserve. Indeed, the two processes, i.e. the gradual loss of resting primordial follicles and the loss of oocyte quality, progress in parallel. In other words, the older the woman becomes, the higher is the risk of miscarriage, but one cannot distinguish between the effects of biological aging on oocyte quality and those mediated by a lower ovarian reserve. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: The present retrospective monocentric cohort study was carried out at Fondazione IRCSS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan. All women referred to the ART Unit between 2014 and 2021 and who underwent either conventional IVF (c-IVF), ICSI, or IUI were reviewed. Only women younger than 35 were eligible because, up to this age, the risk of miscarriage is steady and not strictly related to age. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Women younger than 35 who achieved a singleton clinical pregnancy with c-IVF, ICSI, or IUI were selected. Women with patent causes of recurrent miscarriage were excluded, as well as those undergoing pregnancy termination for fetal or medical causes. Women who did and did not have a pregnancy loss before 20 weeks' gestation were compared. Detailed information was obtained from charts of the consulting patients. ART procedures were performed according to the standardized policy of our Unit. All women underwent serum AMH measurement and a transvaginal assessment of AFC prior to initiation of treatment. AMH levels were measured by a commercially available ELISA assay. To assess AFC, all identifiable antral follicles 2-10 mm in diameter at ultrasound were recorded. The primary outcome was the risk of miscarriage for women with serum AMH levels below 5 pmol/l. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 538 women were included, of whom 92 (17%) had a miscarriage. The areas under the ROC curves for prediction of miscarriage based on AMH levels and AFC were 0.51 (95% CI: 0.45-0.58) and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.45-0.59), respectively. The odds ratio (OR) of miscarriage for women with serum AMH levels below 5.0 pmol/l was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.51-2.36); the adjusted OR was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.51-2.45). Analyses were repeated considering other thresholds for AMH (2.9, 3.6 and 7.9 pmol/l) and for AFC (thresholds of 7 and 10). No associations emerged. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective design of the study hampered the collection of more precise but potentially relevant clinical information of the couples. We did not exclude women suffering from PCOS, a condition possibly associated with miscarriage. Moreover, the baseline characteristics of women who did and did not have a miscarriage differed in some characteristics. Thus, we adjusted the OR using a multivariate analysis, but we cannot fully exclude residual confounding effects. Finally, our results cannot be inferred to women older than 35. The mechanisms causing premature exhaustion of ovarian reserve may be different in younger and older women and this may lead to a different impact on the risk of miscarriage. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Women embarking on ART with low ovarian reserve should be informed of their likely poor response to ovarian stimulation but can be reassured that, if conception occurs, their risk of miscarriage is not increased. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was partially funded by Italian Ministry of Health-Current research IRCCS. E.S. reports grants from Ferring and honoraria for lectures from Merck-Serono and Gedeon-Richter. All the other authors do not have any competing interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Home fetal heart rate monitoring in anti Ro/SSA positive pregnancies: Literature review and case report.

Anti-Ro/SSA antibodies are associated with a risk of 1-2 % to develop complete atrioventricular block (AVB) in fetuses of positive mothers. Complete AVB is irreversible, but studies suggest that anti-inflammatory treatment during the transition period from a normal fetal heart rate (FHR) to an AVB might stop this progression and restore sinus rhythm. The most efficient method for diagnostic evaluation of this arrhythmia is the pulsed-Doppler fetal echocardiography. However, weekly or bi-weekly recommended fetal echocardiographic surveillance can rarely identify an AVB in time for treatment success, also because the transition from a normal rhythm to a third degree AVB is very fast. Daily FHR monitoring in a medical facility could increase the chances of identifying the AVB onset but is difficult to realize. For this reason, an alternative method of FHR monitoring, performed directly by mothers in their home context, has been recently proposed. We present a case report utilizing this approach and review the current evidence about this condition.