RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Electrodiagnostic evaluation provides an important extension to the neurological examination for the evaluation of pediatric neuromuscular disease. Many pediatric neuromuscular diseases are analogous to those seen in the adult. However, the relative frequency of these illnesses varies greatly when different age populations are compared. The purpose of the present study is to provide a retrospective analysis of children referred to our electromyography (EMG) laboratory for electrophysiological examinations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed electrodiagnostic records of patients aged between 0-15 years, from January 2004 to June 2013. Patients were classified as having plexopathy, nerve root lesions, polyneuropathy, myopathy, mononeuropathy, anterior horn cell disease, neuromuscular transmission disorder, facial nerve palsy, and other rare disorders. RESULTS: We reviewed totally 5563 pediatric records, which was on the average 578 studies per year. It was about 14% of the all EMG examinations performed in our laboratory. When we looked at all the procedures, 3271 of the records included needle EMGs, 170 of them were single fiber EMGs, 100 of them were repetitive nerve stimulations, and 52 of them were evoked potentials. The results were normal in 55% of the cases. As a result of electrophysiological examinations, the common diagnoses were: plexopathy (28.6%), polyneuropathy (7.4%), and myopathy (6.6%) in patients aged 0-5 years (41.2% of all records); myopathy (9.4%), PNP (8.5%), mononeuropathy (6.4%), and plexopathy (5.9%) in 6-10 years (28.2% of all records); PNP (11.3%), myopathy (6.6%), and mononeuropathy (5.6%) in 11-15 years (30.6% of all records). CONCLUSION: Infants and toddlers mostly suffered from brachial plexopathy which can be prevented by proper obstetrical management. Nerve conduction studies and EMG yielded diagnostic importance for demyelinating neuropathy and myopathy in patients older than 6 years of age.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Identification of abnormal motor unit potentials (MUP), in particular those caused by myopathic processes, is generally difficult in facial muscles because the MUPs are already low in amplitude and short in duration. Therefore, quantitative measures for the limits of abnormality are needed more frequently for these muscles, especially for the pathological processes predominantly affecting the craniofacial area. In this study, we aimed to determine some quantitative values that may help us to differentiate "myogenic" and "neurogenic" processes in periocular muscles. METHODS: The frontalis muscle was examined unilaterally with multi-MUP and interference pattern analyses in 32 normal subjects, 31 patients with different types of myopathy, and 13 patients with facial palsy. Abnormality limits were calculated by using five previously suggested methods, two of which were based on group means and the other three on determining the outlier values. The sensitivity and specificity of multi-MUP and interference pattern parameters in discriminating abnormal findings by using these different methods were analyzed. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences for all MUP parameters, except for the frequency, was found between the groups (P < 0.001). Motor unit potential duration, size index, and amplitude were the most valuable parameters for distinguishing the individual abnormalities. However, their discriminating power was higher for neuropathies than for myopathies. Interference pattern analysis was found not to have any superior sensitivity to MUP analysis. In this study, the outlier analysis that depends on the 5th to 95th percentile limits of the pooled data provided the best power for the discrimination of both neuropathies and myopathies from normal subjects. CONCLUSION: Multi-MUP analysis seems to be helpful in differentiating the patients with neurogenic and-to a lesser extent-myogenic facial muscle involvement.
