Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Zootaxa ; 4894(4): zootaxa.4894.4.1, 2020 Dec 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33311060

RESUMO

Mealybugs (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Pseudococcidae) are important pests in fruit production in Uruguay; however, very little is known about the species involved. A survey of mealybugs associated especially with fruit crops (apple, citrus, figs, grapes, pears, quince and strawberry), and other crops like vegetables and sugar cane, ornamentals and weeds was performed between 2017 and 2019 in Uruguay, using integrated taxonomy (morphology and DNA analyses) for their identification. A total of 19 mealybug species were identified. The most common species were Planococcus ficus (Signoret), Pseudococcus scatoterrae Granara de Willink and Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret) on fruits, and Phenacoccus madeirensis Green, Phenacoccus peruvianus Granara de Willink and Planococcus citri (Risso) on ornamental plants, all of them causing damage to their hosts. This study presents nine new species records for Uruguay, besides the description of two new species. An identification key to the mealybugs in Uruguay is provided.


Assuntos
Hemípteros , Malus , Vitis , Animais , Frutas , Uruguai
2.
Pathog Glob Health ; 111(6): 306-316, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28829235

RESUMO

Prior to the current public health emergency following the emergence of chikungunya and Zika Virus Disease in the Americas during 2014 and 2015, multi-country research investigated between 2011 and 2013 the efficacy of novel Aedes aegypti intervention packages through cluster randomised controlled trials in four Latin-American cities: Fortaleza (Brazil); Girardot (Colombia), Acapulco (Mexico) and Salto (Uruguay). Results from the trials led to a scaling up effort of the interventions at city levels. Scaling up refers to deliberate efforts to increase the impact of successfully tested health interventions to benefit more people and foster policy and program development in a sustainable way. The different scenarios represent examples for  a 'vertical approach' and a 'horizontal approach'. This paper presents the analysis of a preliminary process evaluation of the scaling up efforts in the mentioned cites, with a focus on challenges and enabling factors encountered by the research teams, analysing the main social, political, administrative, financial and acceptance factors.


Assuntos
Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Controle de Mosquitos/métodos , Controle de Mosquitos/organização & administração , População Urbana , Aedes/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Animais , Febre de Chikungunya/epidemiologia , Febre de Chikungunya/prevenção & controle , Cidades/epidemiologia , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiologia , Infecção por Zika virus/epidemiologia , Infecção por Zika virus/prevenção & controle
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 97(5): 1428-1436, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28820690

RESUMO

To contribute to the prevention of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika, a process of scaling up an innovative intervention to reduce Aedes aegypti habitats, was carried out in the city of Salto (Uruguay) based on a transdisciplinary analysis of the eco-bio-social determinants. The intervention in one-third of the city included the distributions of plastic bags for all households to collect all discarded water containers that were recollected by the Ministry of Health and the Municipality vector control services. The results were evaluated in 20 randomly assigned clusters of 100 households each, in the intervention and control arm. The intervention resulted in a significantly larger decrease in the number of pupae per person index (as a proxy for adult vector abundance) than the corresponding decrease in the control areas (both areas decreased by winter effects). The reduction of intervention costs ("incremental costs") in relation to routine vector control activities was 46%. Community participation increased the collaboration with the intervention program considerably (from 48% of bags handed back out of the total of bags delivered to 59% of bags handed back). Although the costs increased by 26% compared with intervention without community participation, the acceptability of actions by residents increased from 66% to 78%.


Assuntos
Febre de Chikungunya/prevenção & controle , Participação da Comunidade , Dengue/prevenção & controle , Controle de Mosquitos , Microbiologia da Água , Infecção por Zika virus/prevenção & controle , Aedes/virologia , Animais , Febre de Chikungunya/transmissão , Participação da Comunidade/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Dengue/transmissão , Seguimentos , Insetos Vetores/virologia , Controle de Mosquitos/economia , Pupa/virologia , Fatores de Risco , Saúde da População Urbana , Uruguai/epidemiologia , Abastecimento de Água , Infecção por Zika virus/transmissão
4.
Pathog Glob Health ; 110(1): 14-24, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26924235

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Five studies were conducted in Fortaleza (Brazil), Girardot (Colombia), Machala (Ecuador), Acapulco (Mexico), and Salto (Uruguay) to assess dengue vector control interventions tailored to the context. The studies involved the community explicitly in the implementation, and focused on the most productive breeding places for Aedes aegypti. This article reports the cost analysis of these interventions. METHODS: We conducted the costing from the perspective of the vector control program. We collected data on quantities and unit costs of the resources used to deliver the interventions. Comparable information was requested for the routine activities. Cost items were classified, analyzed descriptively, and aggregated to calculate total costs, costs per house reached, and incremental costs. RESULTS: Cost per house of the interventions were $18.89 (Fortaleza), $21.86 (Girardot), $30.61 (Machala), $39.47 (Acapulco), and $6.98 (Salto). Intervention components that focused mainly on changes to the established vector control programs seem affordable; cost savings were identified in Salto (-21%) and the clean patio component in Machala (-12%). An incremental cost of 10% was estimated in Fortaleza. On the other hand, there were also completely new components that would require sizeable financial efforts (installing insecticide-treated nets in Girardot and Acapulco costs $16.97 and $24.96 per house, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The interventions are promising, seem affordable and may improve the cost profile of the established vector control programs. The costs of the new components could be considerable, and should be assessed in relation to the benefits in reduced dengue burden.


Assuntos
Aedes/fisiologia , Dengue/economia , Controle de Mosquitos/economia , Animais , Dengue/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Insetos Vetores/fisiologia , América Latina , Controle de Mosquitos/métodos
5.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 109(2): 134-42, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25604764

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Uruguay is located at the southern border of Aedes aegypti distribution on the South American sub-continent. The reported dengue cases in the country are all imported from surrounding countries. One of the cities at higher risk of local dengue transmission is Salto, a border city with heavy traffic from dengue endemic areas. METHODS: We completed an intervention study using a cluster randomized trial design in 20 randomly selected 'clusters' in Salto. The clusters were located in neighborhoods of differing geography and economic, cultural and social aspects. RESULTS: Entomological surveys were carried out to measure the impact of the intervention on vector densities. Through participatory processes of all stakeholders, an appropriate ecosystem management intervention was defined. Residents collected the abundant small water holding containers and the Ministry of Public Health and the Municipality of Salto were responsible for collecting and eliminating them. Additional vector breeding places were large water tanks; they were either altered so that they could not hold water any more or covered so that oviposition by mosquitoes could not take place. CONCLUSIONS: The response from the community and national programme managers was encouraging. The intervention evidenced opportunities for cost savings and reducing dengue vector densities (although not to statistically significant levels). The observed low vector density limits the potential reduction due to the intervention. A larger sample size is needed to obtain a statistically significant difference.


Assuntos
Aedes/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , Dengue/prevenção & controle , Reservatórios de Doenças/parasitologia , Controle de Mosquitos/organização & administração , Animais , Análise por Conglomerados , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dengue/transmissão , Ecossistema , Entomologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Inovação Organizacional , Pupa/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Saúde da População Urbana , Uruguai/epidemiologia , Gerenciamento de Resíduos/métodos , Abastecimento de Água
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 14: 38, 2014 Jan 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24447796

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dengue is an increasingly important public health problem in most Latin American countries and more cost-effective ways of reducing dengue vector densities to prevent transmission are in demand by vector control programs. This multi-centre study attempted to identify key factors associated with vector breeding and development as a basis for improving targeted intervention strategies. METHODS: In each of 5 participant cities in Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Uruguay, 20 clusters were randomly selected by grid sampling to incorporate 100 contiguous households, non-residential private buildings (businesses) and public spaces. Standardized household surveys, cluster background surveys and entomological surveys specifically targeted to obtain pupal indices for Aedes aegypti, were conducted in the dry and wet seasons. RESULTS: The study clusters included mainly urban low-middle class populations with satisfactory infrastructure and -except for Uruguay- favourable climatic conditions for dengue vector development. Household knowledge about dengue and "dengue mosquitoes" was widespread, mainly through mass media, but there was less awareness around interventions to reduce vector densities. Vector production (measured through pupal indices) was favoured when water containers were outdoor, uncovered, unused (even in Colombia and Ecuador where the large tanks used for household water storage and washing were predominantly productive) and -particularly during the dry season- rainwater filled. Larval infestation did not reflect productive container types. All productive container types, including those important in the dry season, were identified by pupal surveys executed during the rainy season. CONCLUSIONS: A number of findings are relevant for improving vector control: 1) there is a need for complementing larval surveys with occasional pupal surveys (to be conducted during the wet season) for identifying and subsequently targeting productive container types; 2) the need to raise public awareness about useful and effective interventions in productive container types specific to their area; and 3) the motivation for control services that-according to this and similar studies in Asia- dedicated, targeted vector management can make a difference in terms of reducing vector abundance.


Assuntos
Aedes/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Cidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Dengue/transmissão , Insetos Vetores/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Controle de Mosquitos , Adulto , Animais , Cruzamento , Meio Ambiente , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Habitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Larva , América Latina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Controle de Mosquitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pupa , Chuva , Saneamento , Estações do Ano , Saúde da População Urbana , Uruguai , Abastecimento de Água
7.
J Insect Sci ; 13: 106, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24738954

RESUMO

Biological control using Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), an egg parasitoid wasp, was tested in Uruguay to reduce populations of lepidopteran pests on soybeans. It was observed that the commercial parasitoid dispensers, which were made of cardboard, were vulnerable to small predators that succeeded in entering and emptying the containers of all the eggs parasitized by T. pretiosum. Observations in a soybean crop showed that the only small, common predators present were two ant species. The species responsible for the above mentioned predation was determined from the results of a laboratory experiment in which the behavior of the two common ants was tested. A modification of the dispensers to prevent introduction of this ant has been proposed and successfully tested in the laboratory and in the field.


Assuntos
Formigas/fisiologia , Controle Biológico de Vetores/métodos , Comportamento Predatório , Vespas/fisiologia , Animais , Cadeia Alimentar , Mariposas/parasitologia , Óvulo/fisiologia , Glycine max/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Especificidade da Espécie , Uruguai
8.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 87(6): 1083-8, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23128295

RESUMO

A study was conducted in the city of Salto, Uruguay, to identify mosquito-producing containers, the spatial distribution of mosquitoes and the relationship between the different population indices of Aedes aegypti. On each of 312 premises visited, water-filled containers and immature Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were identified. The containers were counted and classified into six categories. Pupae per person and Stegomyia indices were calculated. Pupae per person were represented spatially. The number of each type of container and number of mosquitoes in each were analyzed and compared, and their spatial distribution was analyzed. No significant differences in the number of the different types of containers with mosquitoes or in the number of mosquitoes in each were found. The distribution of the containers with mosquito was random and the distribution of mosquitoes by type of container was aggregated or highly aggregated.


Assuntos
Aedes/fisiologia , Demografia , Utensílios Domésticos , Animais , Cidades , Dengue/prevenção & controle , Habitação , Humanos , Insetos Vetores , Uruguai , Água
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...