Prevalence of dyslipidemia in statin-treated patients in Canada: results of the DYSlipidemia International Study (DYSIS).

BACKGROUND: Despite clear guideline recommendations, there is a growing body of evidence that there is suboptimal use of lipid-lowering treatment in Canadians. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and types of persistent lipid abnormalities in Canadian patients receiving statin therapy. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study recruited 2436 outpatients 45 years of age or older who were treated with statins by 232 physicians from 10 provinces; all underwent clinical examination and had their latest fasting lipid values while on statin therapy recorded. RESULTS: The median patient age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58 to 74 years), 60% were men and 80% were in the high 10-year risk category. The median low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 2.0 mmol/L (IQR 1.6 mmol/L to 2.5 mmol/L) and the median total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio was 3.4 mmol/L (IQR 2.8 mmol/L to 4.1 mmol/L). However, based on the 2006 Canadian Cardiovascular Society recommendations, 37% of all patients did not have a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level at goal or intervention target level, including 45% of high-risk category patients. The majority of patients received atorvastatin (50%) or rosuvastatin (37%) but primarily at low-to-medium doses, and a minority (14%) received additional lipid-modifying therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The present observational study highlights the need for more intensive treatment of lipid abnormalities, particularly among high-risk patients. Recognizing several important limitations related to the observational nature of the study, the findings suggest the possibility that, in addition to optimizing adherence, there remains an important need to titrate current statin therapy to higher doses and potentially use a combination of lipid-modifying treatments (once the statin dose has been truly maximized) to further bridge the gap between evidence-based medicine and current Canadian practice.

Effectiveness of dorzolamide­timolol (COSOPT) in patients who were treatment naive for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the COSOPT first-line study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of dorzolamide-timolol (DT) in the management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension. METHODS: An open-label, 12-week, multicenter, Canadian study was conducted. Patients with untreated OAG or ocular hypertension received DT for 12 weeks to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP). If target IOP was not reached after the first 6-week treatment period, a prostaglandin (PG) (latanoprost) was added for the remaining 6 weeks. Primary outcome measures were changes in IOP from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks of treatment, and secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients achieving target IOP and the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic response defined as a reduction of 5.0 mmHg or 20% in IOP from baseline. IOP values were the mean of 2 measures taken before and at least 2 h after patients administered the study medication. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were enrolled. Mean [standard deviation (SD)] population age was 63.0 (12.3) years and 53.0% of the patients were men. At week 6, the mean (SD) absolute and percent change in IOP for the total population was (-11.1) (4.9) and (-36.4)% (13.9%), respectively, and 92.1% of the patients achieved a reduction in IOP of at least 5 mmHg. Therapeutic target was achieved by 136 (82.9%) patients (DT subgroup) at 6 weeks, whereas 28 (17.1%) patients were changed to a combination therapy of DT and latanoprost [DT plus PG (DT & PG) subgroup]. Between weeks 6 and 12, DT was effective in sustaining the IOP within therapeutic target, whereas addition of latanoprost reduced the IOP of the DT & PG subgroup by an additional 6.3 mmHg or 22.1% (20.1%). At week 12, patients in the DT subgroup experienced a clinically and statistically significant mean (SD) decrease in IOP from a baseline of 12.2 mmHg or 40.4% (11.9%) (P < 0.001), whereas these values corresponded to 13.4 mmHg and 39.7% (15.7%) (P < 0.001), respectively, in the DT & PG subgroup. The proportion of patients who achieved therapeutic response during the entire 12-week study period was over 82%. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 19 (14.0%) patients in the DT subgroup and by 6 (21.4%) patients in the combination subgroup. Eye disorders and nervous system disorders were among the most common treatment-related AEs in both subgroups. No serious AEs were reported during the study period. CONCLUSION: DT alone and DT in combination with a PG are effective in significantly reducing IOP in patients with untreated OAG or ocular hypertension. The treatment was safe and well tolerated with a low incidence of AEs.

Effectiveness and safety of dorzolamide-timolol alone or combined with latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of glaucoma is aimed at reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) to prevent further damage to the optic nerve. For patients who do not respond to monotherapy, combination treatment may be effective in achieving therapeutic reduction or target IOP. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dorzolamide 2% with timolol 0.5% alone or combined with latanoprost in reducing IOP in a real-world setting. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized interventional study was designed. Three hundred fifty patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and uncontrolled IOP after latanoprost monotherapy for 4 or more weeks were treated with combination dorzolamide-timolol twice daily added to their existing latanoprost therapy (D/T-Add-On; n = 280) or dorzolamide-timolol twice daily monotherapy (D/T-Switch; n = 70). The primary effectiveness outcome measure was the change in IOP after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Of the total population, 313 patients completed this trial (248 D/T-Add-On; 65 D/T-Switch). After 12 weeks, the mean +/- SD IOP decrease was -6.3 +/- 3.6 mm Hg (-28.1%) and -5.8 +/- 4.9 mm Hg (-23.5%) in the D/T-Add-On and D/T-Switch groups, respectively (both p < 0.001). Therapeutic response rates (defined as IOP reduction >20%) after 12 weeks of treatment for the D/T-Add-On and the D/T-Switch groups were 66.4% (186/280) and 52.9% (37/70), respectively. There were 116 predominantly mild, nonserious adverse events attributed to the study drugs, reported by 86 (24.6%) patients. The most frequent adverse events were eye irritation (n = 42; 12.0%) and taste perversion (n = 15; 4.3%). No serious adverse events related to the study medications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and elevated IOP while on monotherapy with latanoprost, switching to dorzolamide-timolol or combining dorzolamide-timolol with latanoprost are effective and safe treatment options for reducing IOP and achieving therapeutic response.