RESUMO
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is considered an emergent field in developing countries. Research on PGx in the Latin American and the Caribbean (LAC) region remains scarce, with limited information in some populations. Thus, extrapolations are complicated, especially in mixed populations. In this paper, we reviewed and analyzed pharmacogenomic knowledge among the LAC scientific and clinical community and examined barriers to clinical application. We performed a search for publications and clinical trials in the field worldwide and evaluated the contribution of LAC. Next, we conducted a regional structured survey that evaluated a list of 14 potential barriers to the clinical implementation of biomarkers based on their importance. In addition, a paired list of 54 genes/drugs was analyzed to determine an association between biomarkers and response to genomic medicine. This survey was compared to a previous survey performed in 2014 to assess progress in the region. The search results indicated that Latin American and Caribbean countries have contributed 3.44% of the total publications and 2.45% of the PGx-related clinical trials worldwide thus far. A total of 106 professionals from 17 countries answered the survey. Six major groups of barriers were identified. Despite the region's continuous efforts in the last decade, the primary barrier to PGx implementation in LAC remains the same, the "need for guidelines, processes, and protocols for the clinical application of pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics". Cost-effectiveness issues are considered critical factors in the region. Items related to the reluctance of clinicians are currently less relevant. Based on the survey results, the highest ranked (96%-99%) gene/drug pairs perceived as important were CYP2D6/tamoxifen, CYP3A5/tacrolimus, CYP2D6/opioids, DPYD/fluoropyrimidines, TMPT/thiopurines, CYP2D6/tricyclic antidepressants, CYP2C19/tricyclic antidepressants, NUDT15/thiopurines, CYP2B6/efavirenz, and CYP2C19/clopidogrel. In conclusion, although the global contribution of LAC countries remains low in the PGx field, a relevant improvement has been observed in the region. The perception of the usefulness of PGx tests in biomedical community has drastically changed, raising awareness among physicians, which suggests a promising future in the clinical applications of PGx in LAC.
RESUMO
The present study aimed to evaluate the impact caused by the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic classification of gliomas in 139 patients studied in Argentina. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were used for histological and immunohistochemical analysis [glial fibrillary acidic protein, KI67, synaptophysin and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1-R132H]. DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues was used for molecular analysis: 1p/19q co-deletion and mutation status of the IDH gene. These experiments were performed by direct Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. According to the new classification, diagnoses included oligodendroglioma IDH-mutant and 1p/19q co-deletion (4.20%), anaplastic oligodendroglioma IDH-mutant and 1p/19q co-deletion (2.52%), diffuse astrocytoma IDH-mutant (6.72%), diffuse astrocytoma IDH-wild type (1.68%), anaplastic astrocytoma IDH-mutant (5.04%), anaplastic astrocytoma IDH-wild type (8.40%), glioblastoma IDH-mutant (5.88%) and glioblastoma IDH-wild type (65.56%). Regarding tumor histology, 60% of oligodendrogliomas, 35% of astrocytoma and 100% of unclassified gliomas were re-classified, while glioblastomas maintained their initial classification. Additionally, the present study evaluated the prognostic value of the histological grade for the 2007 and 2016 WHO classifications of gliomas. The histological subgroup associated with longer overall survival (OS) was grade II glioma (OS-2007WHO, 35.6 months; and OS-2016WHO, 47.7 months). Glioblastoma was the subgroup associated with a poor outcome (OS-2007WHO, 10.4 months; and OS-2016WHO, 11.1 months). The present study evaluated the OS of tumor grade subgroups with respect to their IDH status. For all subgroups, IDH-mutant tumors were associated with an improved prognosis compared with IDH-wild type tumors. The results suggested that the incorporation of molecular biomarkers in the new WHO classification improves tumor characterization and prognostic value of the subgroups.
