Strict compliance to a thoracic enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is associated with improved outcomes compared with partial compliance: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Benefits of thoracic enhanced recovery after surgery programs have been described. However, there is ongoing discussion on the importance of full protocol compliance. The objective of this study was to determine whether strict adherence to an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol leads to further improvement in outcomes compared with less strict compliance. METHODS: This was a multihospital prospective cohort study of all consecutive anatomic lung resection patients on the thoracic enhanced recovery after surgery pathway from May 2021 to March 2023, with comparison with a historical control from January 2019 to April 2021. Compliance to 5 key protocol elements was tracked. Patients were grouped into high- and low-compliance cohorts, defined as adherence to 4-5/5 or 0-3/5 elements, respectively. The primary outcome was overall morbidity; secondary outcomes included cardiac, respiratory, and infectious morbidity and length of stay. RESULTS: Of the 960 patients, 429 (44.7%) were enhanced recovery after surgery patients and 531 (55.3%) were in the historical control group. Across all patients, 250 (26.0%) were considered high compliance and 710 (74.0%) were considered low compliance. After adjustment for enhanced recovery after surgery status and confounders, the association between high compliance and improved outcomes persisted for all but infectious morbidity. Compared with low compliance, high compliance was associated with decreased odds of any morbidity (0.41 [95% CI, 0.22-0.77]), cardiac morbidity (0.31 [0.11-0.91]), respiratory morbidity (0.46 [0.23-0.90]) and decreased length of stay (0.38 [0.18-0.87]). CONCLUSION: Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols improve outcomes after anatomic lung resection. Increasing compliance to individual elements (>80%) further improves patient outcomes. Continued efforts should be directed at increasing compliance to individual protocol elements.

Anatomic Lung Resection Outcomes After Implementation of a Universal Thoracic ERAS Protocol Across a Diverse Health Care System.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate how implementing a thoracic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol impacted surgical outcomes after elective anatomic lung resection. BACKGROUND: The effect of implementing the ERAS Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgery thoracic ERAS protocol on postoperative outcomes throughout an entire health care system has not yet been reported. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study within one health care system (January 2019-March, 2023). A thoracic ERAS protocol was implemented on May 1, 2021 for elective anatomic lung resections, and postoperative outcomes were tracked using the electronic health record and Vizient data. The primary outcome was overall morbidity; secondary outcomes included individual complications, length of stay, opioid use, chest tube duration, and total cost. Patients were grouped into pre-ERAS and post-ERAS cohorts. Bivariable comparisons were performed using independent t -test, χ 2 , or Fisher exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for confounders. RESULTS: There were 1007 patients in the cohort; 450 (44.7%) were in the post-ERAS group. Mean age was 66.2 years; most patients were female (65.1%), white (83.8%), had a body mass index between 18.5 and 29.9 (69.7%), and were ASA class 3 (80.6%). Patients in the postimplementation group had lower risk-adjusted rates of any morbidity, respiratory complication, pneumonia, surgical site infection, arrhythmias, infections, opioid usage, ICU use, and shorter postoperative length of stay (all P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative outcomes were improved after the implementation of an evidence-based thoracic ERAS protocol throughout the health care system. This study validates the ERAS Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgery guidelines and demonstrates that simultaneous multihospital implementation can be feasible and effective.

Novel Electronic Health Records-Based Consultation Workflow Improves Time to Operating Room for Vascular Surgery Patients in an Acute Setting.

BACKGROUND: Inefficient clinical workflows can have downstream effects of increased costs, poor resource utilization, and worse patient outcomes. The surgical consultation process can be complex with unclear communication, potentially delaying care for patients requiring time-sensitive intervention in an acute setting. A novel electronic health records (EHR)-based workflow was implemented to improve the consultation process. After implementation, we assessed the impact of this initiative in patients requiring vascular surgery consultation. METHODS: An EHR-driven consultation workflow was implemented at a single institution, standardizing the process across all consulting services. This order-initiated workflow automated notification to clinicians of consult requests, communication of patient data, patient addition to consultants' lists, and tracking consult completion. Preimplementation (1/1/2020-1/31/2022) and postimplementation (2/1/2022-12/4/2022) vascular surgery consultation cohorts were compared to evaluate the impact of this initiative on timeliness of care. RESULTS: There were 554 inpatient vascular surgery consultations (255 preimplementation and 299 postimplementation); 45 and 76 consults required surgery before and after implementation, respectively. The novel workflow resulted in placement of a consult note 32 min faster than preimplementation (preimplementation: 462 min, postimplementation: 430 min, P = 0.001) for all vascular surgery consults. Furthermore, vascular surgery patients with ASA class III or IV status requiring an urgent or emergent operation were transported to the operating room 63.3% faster after implementation of the workflow (preimplementation: 284 min, postimplementation: 180 min, P = 0.02). There were no differences in procedure duration, postoperative disposition, or intraoperative complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: We implemented a novel workflow utilizing the EHR to standardize and automate the consultation process in the acute inpatient setting. This institutional initiative significantly improved timeliness of care for vascular surgery patients, including decreased time to operation. Innovations such as this can be further disseminated across shared EHR platforms across institutions, representing a powerful tool to increase the value of care in vascular surgery and healthcare overall.